본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Clinical Application of the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score at Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Bacteremia: A Single-Center Experience of Korea

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (based on the 2016 definition of sepsis) at intensive care unit admission in Korean patients with bacteremia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 236 patients between March 2011 and February 2016. In addition to the qSOFA, the Modified Early Warning score (MEWS) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were calculated. Results: The patients’ median age was 69 years, and 61.0% were male. Of the patients, 127 (53.8%) had a qSOFA score ≥2 points. They had significantly higher rates of septic shock, thrombocytopenia, and hyperlactatemia, and increased requirements for ventilator care, neuromuscular blocking agents, vasopressors, and hemodialysis within 72 hours after intensive care unit admission. They also had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate. When analyzed using common thresholds (MEWS ≥5 and ≥2 SIRS criteria), patients with a MEWS ≥5 had the same results as those with a qSOFA score ≥2 (P < 0.05). However, patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Our results show that a qSOFA score ≥2 at admission is a useful screening tool for predicting disease severity and medical resource usage within 72 hours after admission, and for predicting 28-day mortality rates in patients with bacteremia. In addition, qSOFA scores may be more useful than SIRS criteria in terms of prognostic utility.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (based on the 2016 definition of sepsis) at intensive care unit admission in Korean patients with bacteremia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 236 patients between March 2011 and February 2016. In addition to the qSOFA, the Modified Early Warning score (MEWS) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were calculated. Results: The patients’ median age was 69 years, and 61.0% were male. Of the patients, 127 (53.8%) had a qSOFA score ≥2 points. They had significantly higher rates of septic shock, thrombocytopenia, and hyperlactatemia, and increased requirements for ventilator care, neuromuscular blocking agents, vasopressors, and hemodialysis within 72 hours after intensive care unit admission. They also had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate. When analyzed using common thresholds (MEWS ≥5 and ≥2 SIRS criteria), patients with a MEWS ≥5 had the same results as those with a qSOFA score ≥2 (P < 0.05). However, patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Our results show that a qSOFA score ≥2 at admission is a useful screening tool for predicting disease severity and medical resource usage within 72 hours after admission, and for predicting 28-day mortality rates in patients with bacteremia. In addition, qSOFA scores may be more useful than SIRS criteria in terms of prognostic utility.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Fleischmann C, "Assessment of global incidence and mortality of hospital-treated sepsis: current estimates and limitations", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 193, pp.259~272 (2016)
  2. Singer M, "The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.801~810 (2016)
  3. Bone RC, "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis: the ACCP", SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians, Chest, pp.1992, 101[DOI]
  4. Levy MM, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign:association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study", Crit Care Med, 43, pp.3~12 (2015)
  5. Rhodes A, "The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study)", Intensive Care Med, 41, pp.1620~1628 (2015)
  6. Herrán-Monge R, "Cítores-González R, Fernández-Ratero JA, et al. Mortality reduction and long-term compliance with surviving sepsis campaign: a nationwide multicenter study", Shock, 45, pp.598~606 (2016)
  7. Damiani E, "Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0125827~ (2015)
  8. Phua J, "Management of severe sepsis in patients admitted to Asian intensive care units: prospective cohort study", BMJ, 342, pp.d3245~ (2011)
  9. Kim JH, "Influence of full-time intensivist and the nurse-to-patient ratio on the implementation of severe sepsis bundles in Korean intensive care units", J Crit Care, 27, pp.414.e11~414.e121 (2012)
  10. 곽상현, "Current Status of Intensive Care Units Registered as Critical Care Subspecialty Training Hospitals in Korea", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 29(3), pp.431~437 (2014), 대한의학회
  11. Subbe CP, "Validation of a modified Early Warning Score in medical admissions", QJM, 94, pp.521~526 (2001)
  12. Levy MM, "2001 SCCM", ESICM, ATS, pp.SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference, Crit Care Med[DOI]
  13. Dellinger RP, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign:international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012", Intensive Care Med, 39, pp.165~228 (2013)
  14. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, "Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome", N Engl J Med, 342, pp.1301~1308 (2000)
  15. Knaus WA, "APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system", Crit Care Med, 13, pp.818~829 (1985)
  16. Vincent JL, "The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction", failure: on behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, 1996, pp.22, 707~710
  17. Churpek MM, "Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for detecting clinical deterioration in infected patients outside the intensive care unit", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 195, pp.906~911 (2017)
  18. Williams JM, "Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction: insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection", Chest, 151, pp.586~596 (2017)
  19. Freund Y, "Prognostic accuracy of sepsis-3 criteria for in-hospital mortality among patients with suspected infection presenting to the emergency department", JAMA, 317, pp.301~308 (2017)
  20. Raith EP, "Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit", JAMA, 317, pp.290~300 (2017)
  21. Seymour CW, "Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.762~774 (2016)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)