본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?

노창균|이우용|강찬|황득수|Long Zheng
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2016.06|Hip and Pelvis|제28권 제2호|pp. 90-97|DOI 10.5371/hp.2016.28.2.90

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

ArthroplastyHipClinical outcomePeriprosthetic fractures

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative clinical outcomes before occurrence of periprosthetic femoral fracture (status before trauma) with postoperative clinical outcomes (status after operation) in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty treated surgically at our institution from January 2010 to January 2014. Among 29 patients who underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty, 3 patients excluded because of non-union of the fracture site. The clinical outcomes were determined by using visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS), and ambulatory ability using Koval classification. VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability was assessed for all the included patients at the last follow-up of status before trauma and after operation. Results: The mean VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability at the last follow-up of status before trauma was 2.2 (range, 0-4), 78.9 (range, 48-92) and 1.9 (range, 1-5), respectively. The mean VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability at the last follow-up of status after operation was 3.1 (range, 1-5), 68.4 (range, 46-81) and 2.9 (range, 2-6), respectively. The clinical outcome of VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability were significantly worsened after surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fracture (P=0.010, P=0.001, and P=0.002, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty could not return to their status before trauma, although patients underwent appropriate surgical treatment and the fracture union achieved.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative clinical outcomes before occurrence of periprosthetic femoral fracture (status before trauma) with postoperative clinical outcomes (status after operation) in patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review was performed of all periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty treated surgically at our institution from January 2010 to January 2014. Among 29 patients who underwent surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty, 3 patients excluded because of non-union of the fracture site. The clinical outcomes were determined by using visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), Harris hip score (HHS), and ambulatory ability using Koval classification. VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability was assessed for all the included patients at the last follow-up of status before trauma and after operation. Results: The mean VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability at the last follow-up of status before trauma was 2.2 (range, 0-4), 78.9 (range, 48-92) and 1.9 (range, 1-5), respectively. The mean VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability at the last follow-up of status after operation was 3.1 (range, 1-5), 68.4 (range, 46-81) and 2.9 (range, 2-6), respectively. The clinical outcome of VAS, HHS and ambulatory ability were significantly worsened after surgical treatment for periprosthetic femoral fracture (P=0.010, P=0.001, and P=0.002, respectively). Conclusion: Patients with periprosthetic femoral fracture after hip arthroplasty could not return to their status before trauma, although patients underwent appropriate surgical treatment and the fracture union achieved.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Horwitz IB, "Artificial hip prosthesis in acute and nonunion fractures of the femoral neck : follow-up study of seventy cases", J Am Med Assoc, 155, pp.564~567 (1954)
  2. Berry DJ, "Epidemiology : hip and knee", Orthop Clin North Am, 30, pp.183~190 (1999)
  3. Papadimitropoulos EA, "Current and projected rates of hip fracture in Canada", CMAJ, 157, pp.1357~1363 (1997)
  4. Lindahl H, "Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty", Injury, 38, pp.651~654 (2007)
  5. Springer BD, "Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A, pp.2156~2162 (2003)
  6. Meek RM, "The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93, pp.96~101 (2011)
  7. Lindahl H, "The excess mortality due to periprosthetic femur fracture. A study from the Swedish national hip arthroplasty register", Bone, 40, pp.1294~1298 (2007)
  8. Klein GR, "Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.1777~1781 (2005)
  9. Masri BA, "Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 420, pp.80~95 (2004)
  10. Duncan CP, "Fractures of the femur after hip replacement", Instr Course Lect, 44, pp.293~304 (1995)
  11. Rayan F, "European validation of the Vancouver classification of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 90, pp.1576~1579 (2008)
  12. Brady OH, "The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.59~62 (2000)
  13. Park MS, "Management of periprosthetic femur fractures treated with distal fixation using a modular femoral stem using an anterolateral approach", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.1270~1276 (2009)
  14. Koval KJ, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 310, pp.150~159 (1995)
  15. Chang RW, "A cost-effectiveness analysis of total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip", JAMA, 275, pp.858~865 (1996)
  16. Phillips JR, "Periprosthetic fractures around hip hemiarthroplasty performed for hip fracture", Injury, 44, pp.757~762 (2013)
  17. Cram P, "Long-term trends in hip arthroplasty use and volume", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.278~285 (2012)
  18. Beals RK, "Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 327, pp.238~246 (1996)
  19. Sung Ki Park, "Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Hip Arthroplasty", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 3(2), pp.101~106 (2011), 대한정형외과학회
  20. Takahiro Niikura, "Treatment Results of a Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Case Series: Treatment Method for Vancouver Type B2 Fractures Can Be Customized", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 6(2), pp.138~145 (2014), 대한정형외과학회
  21. Moreta J, "Functional and radiological outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip arthroplasty", Injury, 46, pp.292~298 (2015)
  22. Moore RE, "A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.872~876 (2014)
  23. García-Rey E, "Increase of cortical bone after a cementless long stem in periprosthetic fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 471, pp.3912~3921 (2013)
  24. Scholz R, "Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty", Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 141, pp.296~302 (2003)
  25. Young SW, "Periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty", ANZ J Surg, 77, pp.424~428 (2007)
  26. Visnjevac O, "The effect of adding functional classification to ASA status for predicting 30-day mortality", Anesth Analg, 121, pp.110~116 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty김민욱, 박지훈, 이정호, 정영율대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2015 · 제27권 제3호Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Following Hip Arthroplasty김태섭, 김태호, 이중명대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2018 · 제30권 제2호Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using a Cable-plate강준순, 박주현, Bong Sung Ko, Kyoung Ho Moon, Tae Hoon Roh, Yeop Na, Yung-Hun Youn대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2019 · 제31권 제3호Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Vancouver B1 and B2 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures: A Proportional Meta-Analysis노영학, Byung-Ho Yoon, Seong Gyun Park대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2023 · 제35권 제4호인공고관절 전치환술 후에 발생한 삽입물 주위 골절의 치료이상홍, 이준영, 최승민대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2004 · 제16권 제4호Periprosthetic Fracture around a Cemented Stem in Total Hip ArthroplastyJun-Young Heu, Ju-Yeong Kim, Se-Won Lee대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2022 · 제34권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Implant Design in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty김정택, 유정준pp. 65-75Results of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using 36 mm Femoral Heads on 1st Generation Highly Cross Linked Polyethylene in Patients 50 Years and Less with Minimum Five Year Follow-up조명래, 최원기, 남준호, 채승범, 김희수pp. 76-81The Short-term Clinical Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Short Metaphyseal Loading Femoral Stem최유왕, 김성국pp. 82-89Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Tantalum Augment in Patients with Paprosky III or IV Acetabular Bone Defects: A Minimum 2-year Follow Up Study문영완, 정민, 김형주, 박윤수, 임승재pp. 98-103Risk Factors Associated with Dislocation after Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture황규태, 김이석, 김준국, 주일한, 김영호pp. 104-111
원문 보기