Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Using a Cable-plate
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To analyze prognostic factors for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) using the cable-plate construct. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 41 PFFs treated by osteosynthesis using the cable-plate system. The mean age of patients was 67.3±12.1 years (range, 42-86 years) and the mean follow-up period was 31.5±11.6 months (range, 12-58 months). Fresh frozen cortical strut allografts were leveraged in three cases for additional stability. Prognostic factors that may potentially affect clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: At the time of final follow-up, fracture union was obtained in 29 hips (70.7%; Group I) after an average of 13.5 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). Healing failure after surgical treatment was observed in 12 cases (29.3%; Group II), including delayed union (n=10) cases and nonunion (n=2). Factors significantly associated with fracture union included fracture pattern (P=0.040), plate overlap percentage to stem length (P<0.001) and Tscore at the preoperative bone mineral density (P=0.011). Transverse-type fractures around or just distal to a well-fixed femoral stem were observed in six cases (50.0%) of Group II. Conclusion: The cable-plate osteosynthesis of PFFs should be performed with caution in transverse-type fractures or in cases with severe osteoporosis. Fixation with sufficient plate overlap to stem length may be critical to prevent healing failure.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze prognostic factors for the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) using the cable-plate construct. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of a consecutive series of 41 PFFs treated by osteosynthesis using the cable-plate system. The mean age of patients was 67.3±12.1 years (range, 42-86 years) and the mean follow-up period was 31.5±11.6 months (range, 12-58 months). Fresh frozen cortical strut allografts were leveraged in three cases for additional stability. Prognostic factors that may potentially affect clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: At the time of final follow-up, fracture union was obtained in 29 hips (70.7%; Group I) after an average of 13.5 weeks (range, 12-24 weeks). Healing failure after surgical treatment was observed in 12 cases (29.3%; Group II), including delayed union (n=10) cases and nonunion (n=2). Factors significantly associated with fracture union included fracture pattern (P=0.040), plate overlap percentage to stem length (P<0.001) and Tscore at the preoperative bone mineral density (P=0.011). Transverse-type fractures around or just distal to a well-fixed femoral stem were observed in six cases (50.0%) of Group II. Conclusion: The cable-plate osteosynthesis of PFFs should be performed with caution in transverse-type fractures or in cases with severe osteoporosis. Fixation with sufficient plate overlap to stem length may be critical to prevent healing failure.
참고문헌 (29)
- Brand S, "Concepts and potential future developments for treatment of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures", Open Orthop J, 9, pp.405~411 (2015)
- Campbell P, "Periprosthetic femoral fractures", Curr Orthop, 16, pp.126~132 (2002)
- 김민욱, "Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty", Hip and Pelvis, 27(3), pp.146~151 (2015), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
- Long Zheng, "Could Patient Undergwent Surgical Treatment for Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture after Hip Arthroplasty Return to Their Status before Trauma?", Hip and Pelvis, 28(2), pp.90~97 (2016), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
- Lindahl H, "Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.857~865 (2005)
- Lindahl H, "Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty", Injury, 38, pp.651~654 (2007)
- Lindahl H, "Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, pp.1215~1222 (2006)
- Brady OH, "The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.59~62 (2000)
- Xue H, "Locking compression plate and cerclage band for type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures preliminary results at average 30-month followup", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.467~471 (2011)[DOI]
- Tadross TS, "Dall-Miles plating for periprosthetic B1 fractures of the femur", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.47~51 (2000)
- Sung Ki Park, "Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Hip Arthroplasty", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 3(2), pp.101~106 (2011), 대한정형외과학회
- 전영수, "Periprosthetic Insufficiency Fracture around Radiographically Loose Cemented Stem: A Report of Two Cases", Hip and Pelvis, 27(3), pp.183~186 (2015), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
- Ricci WM, "Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant. Surgical technique", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88(Suppl 1 Pt 2), pp.275~282 (2006)
- Lewis GS, "Tangential bicortical locked fixation improves stability in Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures: a biomechanical study", J Orthop Trauma, 29, pp.e364~e370 (2015)
- Kelley SS, "Periprosthetic femoral fractures", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2, pp.164~172 (1994)
- Serocki JH, "Treatment of fractures about hip prostheses with compression plating", J Arthroplasty, 7, pp.129~135 (1992)
- Lever JP, "The biomechanical analysis of three plating fixation systems for periprosthetic femoral fracture near the tip of a total hip arthroplasty", J Orthop Surg Res, 5, pp.45~ (2010)
- Wilson D, "A biomechanical study comparing cortical onlay allograft struts and plates in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures", Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 20, pp.70~76 (2005)
- Dennis MG, "Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures : a biomechanical comparison of two techniques", J Orthop Trauma, 15, pp.177~180 (2001)
- Dennis MG, "Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem : a biomechanical study of 5 techniques", J Arthroplasty, 15, pp.523~528 (2000)
- Learmonth ID, "The management of periprosthetic fractures around the femoral stem", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, pp.13~19 (2004)
- Ehlinger M, "Type C periprosthetic fractures treated with locking plate fixation with a mean follow up of 2.5 years", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 96, pp.44~48 (2010)
- Schütz M, "Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases", Injury, 32(Suppl 3), pp.SC48~SC54 (2001)
- Kolb W, "Fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with the less invasive stabilization system (LISS): a new minimally invasive treatment with locked fixed-angle screws", Zentralbl Chir, 128, pp.53~59 (2003)
- Min BW, "Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with locking compression plate in patients with Vancouver type B1periprosthetic femoral fractures", Injury, 49, pp.1336~1340 (2018)
- Corten K, "An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 91, pp.1424~1430 (2009)
- Howell JR, "Cable plates and onlay allografts in periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip replacement : laboratory and clinical observations", Instr Course Lect, 53, pp.99~110 (2004)
- Kim YH, "Use of locking plate and strut onlay allografts for periprosthetic fracture around well-fixed femoral components", J Arthroplasty, 32, pp.166~170 (2017)
- Moore RE, "A systematic review of open reduction and internal fixation of periprosthetic femur fractures with or without allograft strut, cerclage, and locked plates", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.872~876 (2014)