본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중환자 중증도 평가도구의 타당도 평가 - APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II -

Comparing the Performance of Three Severity Scoring Systems for ICU Patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II

황정해|권영대|김은경
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society For Preventive Medicine)|2005.08|예방의학회지 (Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health)|제38권 제3호|pp. 276-282

2

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류예방의학/직업환경의학

초록

Abstract

Objectives : To evaluate the predictive validity of three scoring systems; the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation(APACHE) III, simplified acute physiology score(SAPS) II, and mortality probability model(MPM) II systems in critically ill patients. Methods : A concurrent and retrospective study conducted by collecting data on consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU) including surgical, medical and coronary care unit between January 1, 2004, and March 31, 2004. Data were collected on 348 patients consecutively admitted to the ICU(aged 16 years or older, no transfer, ICU stay at least 8 hours). Three models were analyzed using logistic regression. Discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity, and correct classification rate. Calibration was assessed using the Lemeshow- Hosmer goodness of fit H-statistic. Results : For the APACHE III, SAPS II and MPM II systems, the area under the receiver operating characterist ic(ROC) curves were 0.981, 0.978, and 0.941 respectively. With a predicted risk of 0.5, the sensitivities for the APACHE III, SAPS II, and MPM II systems were 81.1, 79.2 and 71.7%, the specificities 98.3, 98.6, and 98.3%, and the correct classification rates 95.7, 95.7, and 94.3%, respectively. The SAPS II and APACHE III systems showed good calibrations(chi-squared H=2.5838 p=0.9577 for SAPS II, and chi-squared H=4.3761 p=0.8217 for APACHE III). Conclusions : The APACHE III and SAPS II systems have excellent powers of mortality prediction, and calibration, and can be useful tools for the quality assessment of intensive care units(ICUs).

참고문헌 (36)

  1. "Clinical survey of patients of theIntensive care unit in Wonju Christian Hospital", pp.84~89
  2. "Survival ofpatients ventilated in an intensive therapy unit", 285, pp.1525~ (1979)
  3. , 1991, ~, pp.Seoul National University
  4. "A severity of diseaseclassification system", pp.818~829
  5. "Risk prediction of hospitalmortality for critically ill hospitalized adult", pp.1619~1636
  6. "APACHE-acute physiology and chronic healthevaluation:A physiologically based classification system", 9, pp.591~597 (1981)
  7. "The performance of intensive care units:doesgood management make a difference", 32, pp.508~525 (1994)
  8. "Predicting outcome incritically ill patients", 22, pp.1345~1348 (1994)
  9. "Refining intensive care outcome prediction byusing changing probabilities of mortality", 16, pp.470~477 (1988)
  10. "A simplified acute physiology scorefor ICU patients", 12, pp.975~977 (1984)
  11. "Evaluationof predictive ability of APACHE II system andhospital outcome in Canadian intensive careunit patients", 23, pp.1177~1183 (1995)
  12. "The APACHE III studydesign:Analytic plan for evaluation of severityand outcome", 17, pp.~221 (1989)
  13. "Scoring systems in cancerpatients admitted for an acute complication in amedical intensive care unit", 28, pp.2786~2792
  14. "Interhospitalcomparison of outcome from intensive careunit with APACHE III scoring system", pp.437~445
  15. "Patient severity classification in amedical ICU using APACHE III and patientseverity classification tool", 30(5), pp.1243~1253
  16. "Predicting patientoutcome from intensive care", pp.33~52
  17. "Ratingthe quality of intensive care units Is it afunction of the intensive care unit scoringsystem", 30(9), pp.1976~1982 (1976)
  18. "Validationof the mortality prediction model for ICUpatients", 15, pp.208~212 (1987)
  19. "A newsimplified acute physiology score(SAPS II)based on a European", North Americalmulticenter study, 1993, pp.270, 2957~2963
  20. "Mortalityprobability models(MPM II)based on aninternational cohort of intensive care unitpatients", 270, pp.2957~2963 (1993)
  21. "Customization ofSAPS II for the assessment of severity inItalian ICU patients", 66, pp.139~145 (2000)
  22. "Performance ofthe mortality probability models(MPM II)inassessing severity of illness during the firstweek in the intensive care unit", 28, pp.2819~2824
  23. "Prediction ofoutcome from intensive care:A prospectivecohort study comparing APACHE II and IIIprognostic systems in a United Kingdomintensive care unit", 25, pp.9~15 (1997)
  24. "Acomparison of severity of illness scoringsystems for intensive care unit patients", 23(8), pp.1327~1335, resultsof multicenter
  25. "A comparison of severity of illnessscoring systems for intensive care unit patientsof multicenter", 23(8), pp.1327~1335
  26. "Application of mortalityprediction systems to individual intensive careunits", 25, pp.977~982 (1999)
  27. , 2002, ~, pp.Chung-ang University
  28. "Outcome prediction inintensive care:Its of a prospective,multicenter,Portuguese study", 23, pp.177~186 (1997)
  29. "Mortality discrimination in acute myocardial infarction:comparisonbetween APACHE III & SAPS II prognosissystem", 23, pp.326~330 (1997)
  30. "Mortality analysis ofintensive care units patients using mortalityprobability models(MPM II).", 14(2), pp.101~107
  31. "Severity illness scoresfor neutropenic patients in an intensive careunit", 26, pp.488~493
  32. "Comparison of threeseverity score for critically ill cancer patients", 30(3), pp.430~436 (2004)
  33. "The risk adjustment", 278(19), pp.1600~1607 (1997)
  34. , 1998, ~, pp.KoreaUniversity
  35. "Predicting mortality inpatients suffering from prolonged criticalillness:an assessment of four severity-of-illnessmeasures", 120, pp.928~933 (2001)
  36. "Multicenter outcome study of cancerpatients admitted to the intensive care unit:aprobability mortality model", 16, pp.761~770

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)

역학과 사회역학송윤미pp. 237-240노동과 건강 불평등, 그 근원은 어디인가?손미아pp. 241-251보건정책과 사회역학신영전pp. 252-258한국적 특수성을 고려한 지역특성과 개인의 건강정성원, 조영태pp. 259-266사회경제적 건강 불평등에 대한 생애적 접근법강영호pp. 267-275
원문 보기