Unilateral cleft lip: evaluation and comparison of treatment outcome with two surgical techniques based on qualitative (subject/guardian and professional) assessment
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. Results: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. Conclusion: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall’s techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively.
Abstract
Objectives: The outcomes of the treatment of unilateral cleft lip can vary considerably due to variations in repair techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare treatment outcomes of surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip using either the Tennison–Randall or Millard technique based on (qualitative) parent/subject and professional assessments. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital between January 2013 and July 2014. A total of 56 subjects with unilateral cleft lip presenting for primary surgery who satisfied the inclusion criteria were recruited for the study. Subjects were randomly allocated to surgical groups A or B through balloting. Group A underwent cleft repair with the Tennison–Randall technique, while group B underwent cleft repair with the Millard rotation advancement technique. Surgical outcome was assessed using qualitative evaluation by the guardian/subject and independent assessors based on a modified form of the criteria described by Christofides and colleagues. Results: Of the 56 subjects enrolled in this study, 32 were male, with a male to female ratio of 1.3:1. Fifteen of the guardians/subjects in the Tennison–Randall group were most bothered about the lower part of the residual lip scar, while 12 guardians/subjects in the in the Millard group were most bothered about the upper part of the scar. More noses were judged to be flattened in the Millard group than in the Tennison–Randall group. Assessors observed a striking disparity in scar transgression of the philtral ridges between the two groups. Conclusion: Essentially, there were no major difference in the overall results between Millard rotation-advancement and Tennison–Randall repairs. Both Millard and Tennison–Randall’s techniques require significant improvements to improve the appearance of the scar on the upper part and lower part of the lip, respectively.
참고문헌 (42)
- Arosarena OA, "Cleft lip and palate", Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 40, pp.27~60 (2007)
- Koppel D., "Bailey & Love's short practice of surgery", pp.645~663 (2004), Arnold
- Demke JC, "Analysis and evolution of rotation principles in unilateral cleft lip repair", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 64, pp.313~318 (2011)
- Nwoku AL, "Experiences on the surgical repair of unoperated adult cleft patients in Nigeria", Niger Med J, 4, pp.417~421 (1976)
- Tan O, "Triangular with Ala nasi(TAN)repair of unilateral cleft lips : a personal technique and early outcomes", J Craniofac Surg, 18, pp.186~197 (2007)
- van de Ven B, "Cleft lip surgery : a practical guide", pp.1~27 (2008), Drukarnia WIST
- Christofides E, "A long term subjective and objective assessment of the scar in unilateral cleft lip repairs using the Millard technique without revisional surgery", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 59, pp.380~386 (2006)
- Nollet PJ, "Nasolabial appearance in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate : a comparison with Eurocleft", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 35, pp.278~286 (2007)
- Asher-McDade C, "Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, pp.385~390 (1991)
- Roberts CT, "Strategies for the advancement of surgical methods in cleft lip and palate", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, pp.141~149 (1991)
- Rullo R, "Delaire's cheilorhinoplasty : unilateral cleft aesthetic outcome scored according to the EUROCLEFT guidelines", Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 70, pp.463~468 (2006)
- Farkas LG, "Anthropometric and anthroposcopic findings of the nasal and facial region in cleft patients before and after primary lip and palate repair", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 30, pp.1~12 (1993)
- Johnson N, "An aesthetic index for evaluation of cleft repair", Eur J Orthod, 25, pp.243~249 (2003)
- Kernahan DA, "A new classification for cleft lip and cleft palate", Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull, 22, pp.435~441 (1958)
- Kernahan DA, "The striped Y--a symbolic classification for cleft lip and palate", Plast Reconstr Surg, 47, pp.469~470 (1971)
- Randall P, "A triangular flap operation for the primary repair of unilateral clefts of the lip", Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull, 23, pp.331~347 (1959)
- Millard DR, "Transactions of the International Society of Plastic Surgeons", pp.160~166 (1957), Williams & Wilkins
- Evans CA, "Index may show outcome differences in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at 5-years of age", Evid Based Dent, 1, pp.7~ (1999)
- Gundlach KK, "Late results following different methods of cleft lip repair", Cleft Palate J, 19, pp.167~171 (1982)
- de Silva Amaratunga NA, "Combining Millard's and Cronin's methods of unilateral cleft lip repair-a comparative study", Asian J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 16, pp.5~9 (2004)
- Dyalram-Silverberg D, "Poster 23: comparison of the rotational advancement flap and an anatomical subunit approximation technique for closure of unilateral cleft lip", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67(Suppl), pp.80~81 (2009)
- Bilwatsch S, "Nasolabial symmetry following Tennison-Randall lip repair : a three-dimensional approach in 10-year-old patients with unilateral clefts of lip, alveolus and palate", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 34, pp.253~262 (2006)
- Sameh E, "Evaluation of primary unilateral cleft lip repair : a proposed scoring system", Egypt J Surg, 28, pp.4~7 (2009)
- Meyer E, "Cleft lip repair : technical refinements for the wide cleft", Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 3, pp.81~86 (2010)
- Reddy SG, "Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip", Plast Reconstr Surg, 125, pp.1208~1216 (2010)
- Zaleckas L, "The comparison of different surgical techniques used for repair of complete unilateral cleft lip", Medicina(Kaunas), 47, pp.85~90 (2011)
- Holtmann B, "A randomized comparison of triangular and rotation-advancement unilateral cleft lip repairs", Plast Reconstr Surg, 71, pp.172~179 (1983)
- Chowdri NA, "A comparative study of surgical results with rotation-advancement and triangular flap techniques in unilateral cleft lip", Br J Plast Surg, 43, pp.551~556 (1990)
- Tobiasen JM, "Development of scales of severity of facial cleft impairment", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 28, pp.419~424 (1991)
- Tobiasen JM, "Facial impairment scales for clefts", Plast Reconstr Surg, 93, pp.31~41 (1994)
- Al-Omari I, "Methods of assessment of cleft-related facial deformity : a review", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 42, pp.145~156 (2005)
- Abdurrazaq TO, "Surgical outcome and complications following cleft lip and palate repair in a teaching hospital in Nigeria", Afr J Paediatr Surg, 10, pp.345~357 (2013)
- Thomas PT, "Satisfaction with facial appearance among subjects affected by a cleft", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 34, pp.226~231 (1997)
- Chait L, "The ultimate straight line repair for unilateral cleft lips", J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 62, pp.50~55 (2009)
- Fudalej P, "Nasolabial esthetics in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate after 1-versus 3-stage treatment protocols", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 67, pp.1661~1666 (2009)
- Millard DR, "Extensions of the rotation-advancement principle for wide unilateral cleft lips", Plast Reconstr Surg, 42, pp.535~544 (1968)
- Mulliken JB, "The principle of rotation advancement for repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity : technical variations and analysis of results", Plast Reconstr Surg, 104, pp.1247~1260 (1999)
- Horswell BB, "The doublereversing Z-plasty in primary palatoplasty : operative experience and early results", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 51, pp.145~149 (1993)
- Cheema SA, "Comparison of outcomes between linear versus triangular flap repair techniques at vermilion in unilateral cleft lip repair", J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 24, pp.75~77 (2012)
- Adenwalla HS, "Primary unilateral cleft lip repair", Indian J Plast Surg, 42(Suppl), pp.S62~S70 (2009)
- Kumar V, "Robbins and Cotran pathologic basis of disease", pp.113~117 (2005), Elsevier Saunders
- Edward E., "Contemporary oral and maxillofacial surgery", pp.633~ (2003), Mobsy