본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인공고관절 전치환술에서 CAOS (Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery)가 필요한가? - 부정적인 관점에서 -

Do You Need CAOS (Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery) in THA? - From a Negative Perspective -

송주현|김철진|이주엽
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2011.06|Hip and Pelvis|제23권 제2호|pp. 103-107

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Total hip replacement arthroplasty인공 고관절 치환술CAOS

초록

인공 고관절의 또 다른 개발 분야로서, 기구 삽입의 정확도를 높이기 위한, 소위‘CAOS (Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery)’가 도입 되고 있다. CAOS를 옹호하는 학자들은 이를 이용하여 인공 고관절 치환술을 시행하면 기구 삽입의 정확도와 일관성을 향상시켜, 부정확한기구 삽입으로 인한 탈구의 위험, 조기 관절면의 마모 그리고 충돌 등을 줄일 수 있고, 다리 길이와 오프셋의 조절이 용이 하다고 주장 한다. 그러나 CAOS의 장점뿐만이 아니라 단점과 한계를알아보고 개선 방향을 연구하여, 인공고관절의 치료 성적을 극대화시키는 것이 필요하기에 부정적인 관점에서 항법장치 혹은 로봇 수술로 대변되는 CAOS를 검토해보고자 한다.

Abstract

CAOS (Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery) has been introduced into the field of artificial joint replacement to increase the accuracy of implant placement. The advocates of CAOS insist that total hip replacement arthroplasty using CAOS will decrease dislocation, the wear rate, impingement and limb length discrepancy by increasing the accuracy and consistency of implant placement. However, we have to maximize the good results of total hip replacement arthroplasty by developing CAOS with understanding its disadvantages and limits, so we have reviewed CAOS using a critical eye for its negative aspects.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Wixson RL, "Computer-assisted total hip navigation", Instr Course Lect, 57, pp.707~720 (2008)
  2. Confalonieri N, "Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand", Orthopedics, 31, pp.35~39 (2008)
  3. Dorr LD, "Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.119~127 (2009)
  4. Fukunishi S, "Assessment of accuracy of acetabular cup orientation in CT-free navigated total hip arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 31, pp.987~ (2008)
  5. Ganapathi M, "Femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing with and without navigation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.1341~1347 (2009)
  6. Haaker RG, "Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion", J Arthroplasty, 22, pp.151~159 (2007)
  7. Judet H, "Five years of experience in hip navigation using a mini-invasive anterior approach", Orthopedics, 30, pp.141~143 (2007)
  8. Kelley TC, "Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.153~158 (2009)
  9. Pitto RP, "Accuracy of a computerassisted navigation system in resurfacing hip arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 33, pp.391~395 (2009)
  10. Renkawitz T, "Accuracy of imageless stem navigation during simulated total hip arthroplasty", Acta Orthop, 79, pp.785~788 (2008)
  11. Romanowski JR, "Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp.65~70 (2008)
  12. Honl M, "Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.1401~1405 (2006)
  13. Nogler M, "Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation", Acta Orthop, 79, pp.789~793 (2008)
  14. Ohashi H, "Status of navigated total hip arthroplasty in dysplastic osteoarthritis", Orthopedics, 30, pp.117~120 (2007)
  15. Chawda M, "Comparison of cemented vs uncemented acetabular component positioning using an imageless navigation system", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.1170~1173 (2009)
  16. Kalteis TA, "In vitro investigation of the influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular cup alignment", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.152~157 (2009)
  17. 임도형, "Validation of a computer navigation system and a CT method for determination of the orientation of implanted acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty: A cadaver study", CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 23(8), pp.1004~1011, ELSEVIER SCI LTD
  18. Noble PC, "Computer simulation: how can it help the surgeon optimize implant position", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 417, pp.242~252 (2003)
  19. Nogler M, "Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 426, pp.159~163 (2004)
  20. Wixson RL, "Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.51~56 (2005)
  21. Kalteis T, "Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.163~167 (2006)
  22. Najarian BC, "Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.15~21 (2009)
  23. Rubash HE, "Navigation in total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.17~ (2009)
  24. Sugano N, "Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.455~460 (2007)
  25. Beringer DC, "An overview of economic issues in computer-assisted total joint arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 463, pp.26~30 (2007)
  26. Langlotz F, "Potential pitfalls of computer aided orthopedic surgery", Injury, 35, pp.17~23 (2004)
  27. Parratte S, "The 2008 Frank Stinchfield award: variation in postoperative pelvic tilt may confound the accuracy of hip navigation systems", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.43~49 (2009)
  28. Ybinger T, "Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation", Int Orthop, 31, pp.35~38 (2007)
  29. Heck DA, "Six sigma analysis of minimally invasive acetabular arthroplasty: a preliminary investigation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.2025~2031 (2009)
  30. Pitto RP, "Accuracy of computerassisted navigation for femoral head resurfacing decreases in hips with abnormal anatomy", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.2310~2317 (2009)
  31. Spencer JM, "Computer navigation of the acetabular component: a cadaver reliability study", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.972~975 (2006)
  32. Beckmann J, "Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. A systematic evaluation of the literature", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 129, pp.863~872 (2009)
  33. Lee YS, "Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues", J Arthroplasty, 23, pp.699~706 (2008)
  34. Wan Z, "Imaging and navigation measurement of acetabular component position in THA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.32~42 (2009)
  35. Ohashi H, "Intraand intersurgeon variability in image-free navigation system for THA", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.2305~2309 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

컴퓨터 시스템을 이용한 고관절 치환술김강일, 유기형, 조계열, 허대석대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2011 · 제23권 제4호The Evolution of Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Relevant Applications김인성, 장준동, Atul M. Bhardwaj, Ramachandra N. Badami대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2017 · 제29권 제1호컴퓨터 응용 인공고관절 모사 시술 방법 연구김상후, 한승무대한의용생체공학회 · 의공학회지2004 · 제25권 제6호인공 고관절 전치환술의 최소 침습 수술법문재영, 박경순, 윤택림대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2011 · 제23권 제3호고관절 전치환술을 위한 수술 전 측정의 정확도: 고식적 가늠술(Acetate Templating)과 디지털 가늠술(Digital Templating)의 비교강동현, 이창호, 조태연, 황성관대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2010 · 제22권 제1호The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip ArthroplastyAhmed Magan, Andreas Fontalis, Fabio Mancino, Fares S. Haddad, Ricci Plastow대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

인공 고관절 전치환술 후 탈구김준식pp. 89-94전방 도달법을 이용한 고관절 수술차승환, 김태영, Otgonbayar Maidar, 이상수pp. 95-102골다공증의 진단문영완, 김재균pp. 108-115세라믹-세라믹형 인공 고관절 전치환술 - 최소 10년 이상 추시 보고 -최장석, 김동환, 김광희, 문도현pp. 116-123대퇴골 전자부 골절에서 감마정과 활강 압박 고나사의 치료 결과 비교권석현pp. 124-130
원문 보기