본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Evolution of Computer-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Relevant Applications

김인성|장준동|Atul M. Bhardwaj|Ramachandra N. Badami
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2017.03|Hip and Pelvis|제29권 제1호|pp. 1-14|DOI 10.5371/hp.2017.29.1.1

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

RobotArthroplastyNavigationHipComputer-assisted orthopaedic surgery

초록

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the accurate positioning of implants is the key to achieve a good clinical outcome. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) has been developed for more accurate positioning of implants during the THA. There are passive, semi-active, and active systems in CAOS for THA. Navigation is a passive system that only provides information and guidance to the surgeon. There are 3 types of navigation: imageless navigation, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, and fluoroscopy-based navigation. In imageless navigation system, a new method of registration without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane was introduced. CT-based navigation can be efficiently used for pelvic plane reference, the functional pelvic plane in supine which adjusts anterior pelvic plane sagittal tilt for targeting the cup orientation. Robot-assisted system can be either active or semi-active. The active robotic system performs the preparation for implant positioning as programmed preoperatively. It has been used for only femoral implant cavity preparation. Recently, program for cup positioning was additionally developed. Alternatively, for ease of surgeon acceptance, semi-active robot systems are developed. It was initially applied only for cup positioning. However, with the development of enhanced femoral workflows, this system can now be used to position both cup and stem. Though there have been substantial advancements in computer-assisted THA, its use can still be controversial at present due to the steep learning curve, intraoperative technical issues, high cost and etc. However, in the future, CAOS will certainly enable the surgeon to operate more accurately and lead to improved outcomes in THA as the technology continues to evolve rapidly.

Abstract

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the accurate positioning of implants is the key to achieve a good clinical outcome. Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) has been developed for more accurate positioning of implants during the THA. There are passive, semi-active, and active systems in CAOS for THA. Navigation is a passive system that only provides information and guidance to the surgeon. There are 3 types of navigation: imageless navigation, computed tomography (CT)-based navigation, and fluoroscopy-based navigation. In imageless navigation system, a new method of registration without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane was introduced. CT-based navigation can be efficiently used for pelvic plane reference, the functional pelvic plane in supine which adjusts anterior pelvic plane sagittal tilt for targeting the cup orientation. Robot-assisted system can be either active or semi-active. The active robotic system performs the preparation for implant positioning as programmed preoperatively. It has been used for only femoral implant cavity preparation. Recently, program for cup positioning was additionally developed. Alternatively, for ease of surgeon acceptance, semi-active robot systems are developed. It was initially applied only for cup positioning. However, with the development of enhanced femoral workflows, this system can now be used to position both cup and stem. Though there have been substantial advancements in computer-assisted THA, its use can still be controversial at present due to the steep learning curve, intraoperative technical issues, high cost and etc. However, in the future, CAOS will certainly enable the surgeon to operate more accurately and lead to improved outcomes in THA as the technology continues to evolve rapidly.

참고문헌 (68)

  1. Chang JD, "Foreword", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.2235~ (2014)
  2. DiGioia AM, "The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (355), pp.8~22 (1998)
  3. Callanan MC, "The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.319~329 (2011)
  4. Eilander W, "Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement", Bone Joint J, 95-B, pp.1326~1331 (2013)
  5. DiGioia AM, "Functional pelvic orientation measured from lateral standing and sitting radiographs", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453, pp.272~276 (2006)
  6. Lembeck B, "Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate", Acta Orthop, 76, pp.517~523 (2005)
  7. Babisch JW, "The rationale for tiltadjusted acetabular cup navigation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp.357~365 (2008)
  8. Nobuhiko Sugano, "Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery and Robotic Surgery in Total Hip Arthroplasty", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 5(1), pp.1~9 (2013), 대한정형외과학회
  9. Nishihara S, "Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using threedimensional computed tomography", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (411), pp.140~151 (2003)
  10. Ranawat CS, "Effect of spinal deformity on pelvic orientation from standing to sitting position", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.1222~1227 (2016)
  11. Suzuki H, "Postural and chronological change in pelvic tilt five years after total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: A three-dimensional analysis", J Arthroplasty, 31, pp.317~322 (2016)
  12. Tamura S, "Spinal factors influencing change in pelvic sagittal inclination from supine position to standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 29, pp.2294~2297 (2014)
  13. Esposito CI, "Does degenerative lumbar spine disease influence femoroacetabular flexion in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 474, pp.1788~1797 (2016)
  14. Taki N, "Change in pelvic tilt angle 2 to 4 years after total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.940~944 (2012)
  15. Barsoum WK, "A computer model of the position of the combined component in the prevention of impingement in total hip replacement", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, pp.839~845 (2007)
  16. Komeno M, "Computed tomographic evaluation of component position on dislocation after total hip arthroplasty", Orthopedics, 29, pp.1104~1108 (2006)
  17. Dorr LD, "Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, pp.119~127 (2009)
  18. Ranawat CS, "Modern techniques of cemented total hip arthroplasty", Techniques Orthoped, 6, pp.17~25 (1991)
  19. Widmer KH, "Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion", J Orthop Res, 22, pp.815~821 (2004)
  20. Sendtner E, "Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion", Z Orthop Unfall, 148, pp.185~190 (2010)
  21. Barrack RL, "Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 11, pp.89~99 (2003)
  22. Stefl M, "Spinopelvic mobility and acetabular component position for total hip arthroplasty", Bone Joint J, 99-B(1 Supple A), pp.37~45 (2017)
  23. Nogler M, "Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (426), pp.159~163 (2004)
  24. Dorr LD, "Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 465, pp.92~99 (2007)
  25. Kalteis T, "Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CTbased navigation?", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.163~167 (2006)
  26. Najarian BC, "Evaluation of component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty using an imageless navigation device compared with traditional methods", J Arthroplasty, 24, pp.15~21 (2009)
  27. Wixson RL, "Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computerassisted hip navigation", J Arthroplasty, 20(7 Suppl 3), pp.51~56 (2005)
  28. 윤호현, "Navigated Acetabular Cup Fixation for Acetabular Deformity or Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty", Hip and Pelvis, 26(3), pp.150~156 (2014), 대한고관절학회[DOI]
  29. Jun-Dong Chang, "Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Imageless Navigation With the Concept of Combined Anteversion", The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32(5), pp.1576~1580 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  30. Parratte S, "Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, pp.494~499 (2007)
  31. Spencer JM, "Computer navigation of the acetabular component: a cadaver reliability study", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, pp.972~975 (2006)
  32. Kiefer H, "Ultrasound vs pointer palpation based method in THA navigation: a comparative study", Orthopedics, 30(10 Suppl), pp.S153~S156 (2007)
  33. Hasart O, "Ultrasound-based navigation and 3D CT compared in acetabular cup position", Orthopedics, 32(10 Suppl), pp.6~10 (2009)
  34. Davis ET, "A new method of registration in navigated hip arthroplasty without the need to register the anterior pelvic plane", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.55~60 (2015)
  35. 이주엽, "인공고관절 전치환술에서 CAOS (Computer Assisted Orthopedic Surgery)가 필요한가? - 부정적인 관점에서 -", Hip and Pelvis, 23(2), pp.103~107 (2011), 대한고관절학회
  36. Jaramaz B, "Computer assisted measurement of cup placement in total hip replacement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (354), pp.70~81 (1998)
  37. Jolles BM, "Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (426), pp.174~179 (2004)
  38. Sugano N, "Does CTbased navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramicon-ceramic THA?", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.3054~3059 (2012)
  39. Haaker R, "Computer-assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips", Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 141, pp.105~111 (2003)
  40. Tannast M, "Accuracy and potential pitfalls of fluoroscopyguided acetabular cup placement", Comput Aided Surg, 10, pp.329~336 (2005)
  41. Gandhi R, "Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a metaanalysis", Int Orthop, 33, pp.593~597 (2009)
  42. Moskal JT, "Acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty: an evidence-based analysis", J Arthroplasty, 26, pp.1432~1437 (2011)
  43. Xu K, "Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty : a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials", Int J Surg, 12, pp.528~533 (2014)
  44. Liu Z, "Imageless navigation versus traditional method in total hip arthroplasty: A metaanalysis", Int J Surg, 21, pp.122~127 (2015)
  45. Bargar WL, "Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (354), pp.82~91 (1998)
  46. Taylor RH, "Computerintegrated revision total hip replacement surgery: concept and preliminary results", Med Image Anal, 3, pp.301~319 (1999)
  47. Honl M, "Comparison of roboticassisted and manual implantation of a primary total hip replacement. A prospective study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85-A, pp.1470~1478 (2003)
  48. Hananouchi T, "Effect of robotic milling on periprosthetic bone remodeling", J Orthop Res, 25, pp.1062~1069 (2007)
  49. Hagio K, "Effectiveness of the ROBODOC system in preventing intraoperative pulmonary embolism", Acta Orthop Scand, 74, pp.264~269 (2003)
  50. Nakamura N, "A comparison between robotic-assisted and manual implantation of cementless total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.1072~1081 (2010)
  51. Lim SJ, "Robotassisted primary cementless total hip arthroplasty with a short femoral stem: a prospective randomized short-term outcome study", Comput Aided Surg, 20, pp.41~46 (2015)
  52. Nogler M, "Excessive heat generation during cutting of cement in the Robodoc hip-revision procedure", Acta Orthop Scand, 72, pp.595~599 (2001)
  53. Nishihara S, "Comparison between hand rasping and robotic milling for stem implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 21, pp.957~966 (2006)
  54. Barrett AR, "Computer-assisted hip resurfacing surgery using the acrobot navigation system", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 221, pp.773~785 (2007)
  55. Dorr LD, "Robotic guidance in total hip arthroplasty:the shape of things to come", Orthopedics, 34, pp.e652~e655 (2011)
  56. Nawabi DH, "Haptically guided robotic technology in total hip arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation", Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 227, pp.302~309 (2013)
  57. Domb BG, "Comparison of robotic-assisted and conventional acetabular cup placement in THA: a matched-pair controlled study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.329~336 (2014)
  58. Redmond JM, "The learning curve associated with robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.50~54 (2015)
  59. Radermacher K, "Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (354), pp.28~38 (1998)
  60. Hananouchi T, "Tailor-made surgical guide based on rapid prototyping technique for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty", Int J Med Robot, 5, pp.164~169 (2009)
  61. Hananouchi T, "Tailor-made Surgical Guide Reduces Incidence of Outliers of Cup Placement", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, pp.1088~1095 (2010)
  62. Zhang YZ, "Preliminary application of computer-assisted patient-specific acetabular navigational template for total hip arthroplasty in adult single development dysplasia of the hip", Int J Med Robot, 7, pp.469~474 (2011)
  63. Kunz M, "Computerassisted hip resurfacing using individualized drill templates", J Arthroplasty, 25, pp.600~606 (2010)
  64. Audenaert E, "A custom-made guide for femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty: development and validation study", Comput Aided Surg, 16, pp.304~309 (2011)
  65. Steppacher SD, "Improving cup positioning using a mechanical navigation instrument", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, pp.423~428 (2011)
  66. Egawa H, "Total hip arthroplasty in osteopetrosis using computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation", J Arthroplasty, 20, pp.1074~1077 (2005)
  67. Gupta A, "Does robotic-assisted computer navigation affect acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty in the obese patient? A comparison study", J Arthroplasty, 30, pp.2204~2207 (2015)
  68. Miki H, "Anatomical hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthroplasty with a large change in pelvic inclination", J Arthroplasty, 27, pp.1641~1650.e1 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

The Value of Computed Tomography Scan in Three-dimensional Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Primary Total Hip ArthroplastyAhmed Magan, Andreas Fontalis, Fabio Mancino, Fares S. Haddad, Ricci Plastow대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제1호Robotic-assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty and Spinopelvic Parameters: A ReviewAnthony D’Abarno, Hue H. Luu, Steven J. Rice대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제2호Surgeon’s Experience and Accuracy of Preoperative Digital Templating in Primary Total Hip ArthroplastyAgustí Bartra-Ylla, Francesc Angles-Crespo, Jorge H. Nuñez, Maria Surroca, Silvia Miguela대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제2호컴퓨터 시스템을 이용한 고관절 치환술김강일, 유기형, 조계열, 허대석대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2011 · 제23권 제4호Navigated Acetabular Cup Fixation for Acetabular Deformity or Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty서효성, 유중진, 윤정로, 윤호현대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2014 · 제26권 제3호Accuracy and Reliability of Preoperative On-screen Templating Using Digital Radiographs for Total Hip Arthroplasty김태우, 서근택, 손승민, 신원철, 신종기, 이정섭대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2016 · 제28권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)

Comprehensive Review of Advancements in Hip Arthroscopy노창균, 황득수pp. 15-23Comparative Study of Peripheral Rim Fixation Using Jumbo Cup in Revisional Hip Arthroplasty김용식, 임진형, 권순용, 임영욱, 김승찬, 조우람pp. 24-29Lower Urinary Tract Infection and Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Elective Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty구경회, 박찬호, 이영균pp. 30-34Acute Delayed or Late Infection of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Treated with Debridement/Antibiotic-loaded Cement Beads and Retention of the Prosthesis유제현, 이상수, 장준동, 김인성pp. 35-43Wiring Techniques for the Fixation of Trochanteric Fragments during Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Clinical Study and Technical Note이중명, 김준현, 김동원, 조용석pp. 44-53
원문 보기