본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 화자의 중국어 억양 발화 연구와 방법론적 고찰: 의문 억양을 중심으로

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

This study examines the pitch patterns of questions in Mandarin that are produced by Korean speakers, in an effort to understand prosodic aspects of interlanguage phenomena. The F0 analysis of question intonation patterns of Korean speakers and those of native speakers of Mandarin shows that the global pitch range and top line manipulation, both of which are associated with pragmatic meanings and syntactic structures of questions, are conducted to a smaller degree in Korean speakers’ utterances. This results in perceptual confusion between statements and questions. However a direct negative transfer from H%, which marks yes-no questions in Korean, is seldom found in Korean speakers’ questions in Mandarin. Furthermore, Korean speakers appear to produce question intonation patterns in interaction with contextual meanings and information structures of questions. This suggests that the intonation patterns of Korean speakers need to be understood not as idiosyncratic and random errors but as part of the interlangauge system they develop in the process of second language acquisition.

Abstract

This study examines the pitch patterns of questions in Mandarin that are produced by Korean speakers, in an effort to understand prosodic aspects of interlanguage phenomena. The F0 analysis of question intonation patterns of Korean speakers and those of native speakers of Mandarin shows that the global pitch range and top line manipulation, both of which are associated with pragmatic meanings and syntactic structures of questions, are conducted to a smaller degree in Korean speakers’ utterances. This results in perceptual confusion between statements and questions. However a direct negative transfer from H%, which marks yes-no questions in Korean, is seldom found in Korean speakers’ questions in Mandarin. Furthermore, Korean speakers appear to produce question intonation patterns in interaction with contextual meanings and information structures of questions. This suggests that the intonation patterns of Korean speakers need to be understood not as idiosyncratic and random errors but as part of the interlangauge system they develop in the process of second language acquisition.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 고미숙, "명령문과 서술문 대비를 통해 본 중국어 명령문 억양의 특징", 중국어문학지, 16, pp.429~455 (2004)
  2. 김길용, "한국인의 중국어 억양에 관한 실험음성학적 연구", 석사, pp.2001
  3. 김성아, "한국어 화자의 영어 억양에 미치는 L1억양구조의 영향과 억양교육", 영어교과교육, 23(2), pp.65~79 (2003)
  4. 배재석, "한국인 화자의 중국어 의문문 억양 분석 연구", 중국언어연구, 16, pp.445~476 (2003)
  5. 손남호, "한국인의 중국어 경계억약 오류 분석", 2008년 한국중국언어학회 춘계학술대회 (2008)
  6. 송지현, "한국인의 중국어 발음상의 문제점 - 언어간섭의 복잡성을 중심으로 억양과 음절길이 분석", 중국어문학논집, (17), pp.153~178 (2001)
  7. 송지현, "중국어 학습에 나타나는 한국어의 간섭 - 어휘와 문법구조로부터 나타나는 간섭", 중국어문학지, 22, pp.345~368 (2006)
  8. 송현선, "生????的??偏?分析", 중국학보, 39, pp.169~178 (1999)
  9. 송현선, "????偏?和????", 중국연구, 27, pp.39~47 (2001)
  10. 유진형, "중간언어 가설", 영어교육, (24), pp.1~19 (1982)
  11. Ok Joo Lee, "Understanding Intonational Phonology of Mandarin Chinese: Issues and Implications", 중국어문학지, 20(20), pp.163~198 (2006), 중국어문학회
  12. 이옥주, "한국인 중국어 학습자의 음향적 초점 발화에 관한 소고", 중국언어연구, 24, pp.219~234 (2007)
  13. 조길, "중개어이론을 통한 작문에서의 ‘就’ 사용의 오류 분석", 중국어문학논집, (28), pp.203~217 (2005)
  14. 정명숙, "일본인과 중국인의 한국어 억양.한국어 교육 14권:233-247", 14, pp.233~247 (2003)
  15. 최전순, "한국인과 중국인의 억양표현 차이에 관한 실험음성학적 연구 - 문장 내 초점의 위치와 관련하여 -", 석사, pp.2006
  16. 황현숙, "중국인 학습자의 한국어 억양 실태 연구 - 두 가지 의문문을 중심으로 -", 인문학연구, 31, pp.161~182 (2004)
  17. 황현숙, "중국인의 문미 억양 실현 분석과 교육 방안 - 반복의문문을 중심으로 -", 새국어 교육, 73, pp.285~317 (2006)
  18. 허용, "한국어 화자의 영어 발음에 나타나는 간섭현상에 대한 중간언어 음운론적 고찰", 이중언어학, (28), pp.415~437 (2005)
  19. Beckman,Mary, "The Parsing of Prosody", Language and Cognitive Process, 11(1), pp.17~67 (1996)
  20. Beckman, Mary, "Tone Inventories and Tune-Text Alignments", ~ (2006)
  21. Brown, H. Douglas, "Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy" (2007), Pearson education Inc
  22. Chao, Yuen Ren, "A Grammar of Spoken Chinese" (1968), University of California Press
  23. Gass, Suan M, "Second Language Acquisition:An Introductory Course.London:Lawrence Erlbaum" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum
  24. Goldsmith,John, "Autosegmental Phonology", 박사, pp.1976
  25. Fon, Janice, "A Cross-Linguistic study on Syntactic and Discourse Boundary Cues in Spontaneous Speech", 박사, pp.2002
  26. Haan, Judith, "Speaking of Questions: An Exploration of Dutch Question Intonation", 박사, pp.2001
  27. Jun,Sun-Ah, "The Phonetics and Phonology of Korean Prosody", 박사, pp.1993
  28. Jun, Sun-Ah, "K-ToBI (Korean ToBI) Labelling Conventions: Version 3", The Korean Journal of Speech Science, 7(1), pp.143~169 (2000)
  29. Jun, Sun-Ah, "A Prosodic Analysis of Three Types ofWh-phrases in Korean", Language and Speech, 39(1), pp.37~61 (1996)
  30. Ladd, D. Robert, "The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English" (1980), Indiana University Press
  31. Ladd, D. Robert, "Intonational Phonology" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  32. Lehiste, Ilse, "Perception of Sentence Boundaries with and without Semantic Information", ~ (1967)
  33. Lee, Ok Joo, "The Prosody of Questions in Mandarin Chinese", 박사, pp.2005
  34. Liberman, Mark, "Intonational Invariance under Changes in Pitch Range and Length" (1984), The MIT Press
  35. Littlewood, William, "Communicative Language Teaching" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  36. Liu, Fang, "Parallel Encoding of Focus and Interrogative Meaning in Mandarin Intonation", ~ (2005)
  37. Mitchell, Rosamond, "Second Language Learning Theories.2nd edition.London:Hodder Arnold" (2004), Hodder Arnold
  38. Omaggio Hadley,Alice, "Teaching Language in Context" (2001), Heinle & Heinle
  39. Peng, Shu-hui, "Effects of Semantic Focus on Taiwanese Intonation in Spontaneous and Read Speech", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(5), pp.2415~2415 (2001)
  40. Peng, Shu-hui, "Towards a Pan-Mandarin System for Prosodic Transcription", ~
  41. Pierrehumbert,Janet, "The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intonation", 박사, pp.1980
  42. Selinker, Larry, "Interlanguage", ~ (1972)
  43. Shafer, Amy J, "Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, pp.169~182 (2000)
  44. Tseng, Chiu-yu, "Fluent Speech Prosody", ~ (2005)
  45. "Special Issue on Quantitative Prosody Modeling for Natural Speech, Description and Generation", Communication, 46(3), pp.284~306
  46. ?俊光, "?比分析????用.文?出版有限公司" (2007), 文?出版有限公司
  47. 林茂?, "界?及其?立作用", ~ (2003)
  48. 沈炯, "北京???的音域和" (1985), 北京大?出版社
  49. 沈炯, "????模型初??", ~ (1992)
  50. 沈炯, "?????造和???型方言", ~ (1994)
  51. 沈炯, "????分?和??方式", ~ (1998)
  52. 宋?喧, "???律成分的?比", ~ (1999)
  53. ?德金, "外???音及?音???究", ~ (2006)
  54. ?湳昊, "普通?????界?音高特征及其", ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)