Horizontal ridge augmentation with porcine bone-derived grafting material: a long-term retrospective clinical study with more than 5 years of follow-up
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of implants placed in horizontally augmented alveolar ridges using porcine bone grafts and to investigate the long-term stability of the porcine bone grafts. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 sites that underwent horizontal ridge augmentation using porcine bone grafts and implant placement with a follow-up period longer than 5 years. Furthermore, additional analysis was conducted on 24 sites where porcine bone grafts were used exclusively for horizontal ridge augmentation and implant placement. Results: The mean follow-up period after prosthesis loading was 67.5 months, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.23 mm at 1 year and a cumulative mean marginal bone loss of 0.40 mm over the entire follow-up period. Of the 49 implants, 2 were lost and 3 did not meet the success criteria, resulting in a survival rate of 95.9% and a success rate of 89.8%. In 24 sites, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.23 mm at 1 year and 0.41 mm at 65.8 months, with 100% survival and success rates. Conclusion: Porcine bone grafts can be successfully used in horizontal ridge augmentation for implant placement in cases of ridges with insufficient horizontal width.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of implants placed in horizontally augmented alveolar ridges using porcine bone grafts and to investigate the long-term stability of the porcine bone grafts. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 sites that underwent horizontal ridge augmentation using porcine bone grafts and implant placement with a follow-up period longer than 5 years. Furthermore, additional analysis was conducted on 24 sites where porcine bone grafts were used exclusively for horizontal ridge augmentation and implant placement. Results: The mean follow-up period after prosthesis loading was 67.5 months, with a mean marginal bone loss of 0.23 mm at 1 year and a cumulative mean marginal bone loss of 0.40 mm over the entire follow-up period. Of the 49 implants, 2 were lost and 3 did not meet the success criteria, resulting in a survival rate of 95.9% and a success rate of 89.8%. In 24 sites, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.23 mm at 1 year and 0.41 mm at 65.8 months, with 100% survival and success rates. Conclusion: Porcine bone grafts can be successfully used in horizontal ridge augmentation for implant placement in cases of ridges with insufficient horizontal width.
참고문헌 (25)
- Esposito M, "Maintaining and re-establishing health around osseointegrated oral implants : a Cochrane systematic review comparing the efficacy of various treatments", Periodontol 2000, 33, pp.204~212 (2003)[DOI]
- Čandrlić M, "Comparison of injectable biphasic calcium phosphate and a bovine xenograft in socket preservation : qualitative and quantitative histologic study in humans", Int J Mol Sci, 23, pp.2539~ (2022)[DOI]
- Koo TH, "Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral : a randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 31, pp.93~102 (2020)[DOI]
- Addis A, "A new anorganic equine bone substitute for oral surgery : structural characterization and regenerative potential", Materials(Basel), 15, pp.1031~ (2022)[DOI]
- Juodzbalys G, "A 5-year follow-up study on one-stage implants inserted concomitantly with localized alveolar ridge augmentation", J Oral Rehabil, 34, pp.781~789 (2007)[DOI]
- Beretta M, "A retrospective evaluation of 192 implants placed in augmented bone : long-term follow-up study", J Oral Implantol, 41, pp.669~674 (2015)[DOI]
- Schmitt CM, "Anorganic bovine bone(ABB)vs. autologous bone(AB)plus ABB in maxillary sinus grafting. A prospective non-randomized clinical and histomorphometrical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.1043~1050 (2015)[DOI]
- Lutz R, "Sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone vs. a bovinederived xenograft : a 5-year retrospective study", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.644~648 (2015)[DOI]
- Hölzer A, "The interrelation of trabecular microstructural parameters of the greater tubercle measured for different species", J Orthop Res, 30, pp.429~434 (2012)[DOI]
- 이정헌, "Physicochemical characterization of porcine bone-derived grafting material and comparison with bovine xenografts for dental applications", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 47(6), pp.388~401 (2017), 대한치주과학회
- Lee JS, "Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals : a randomized clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.729~737 (2018)[DOI]
- Lee JS, "Randomized clinical trial of maxillary sinus grafting using deproteinized porcine and bovine bone mineral", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, pp.140~150 (2017)[DOI]
- Agop-Forna D, "Postoperative study of bone gain in mandibular alveolar bone reconstructed with screw-guided bone regeneration technique and porcine-derived xenograft in 42 edentulous patient candidates for implant-prosthetic therapy", Appl Sci, 11, pp.9826~ (2021)[DOI]
- Scarano A, "Porcine bone used in sinus augmentation procedures : a 5-year retrospective clinical evaluation", J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 68, pp.1869~1873 (2010)[DOI]
- Roberto C, "Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation : a 10-year retrospective radiological study", Int J Implant Dent, 7, pp.74~ (2021)[DOI]
- Marconcini S, "Clinical outcomes of implants placed in ridge-preserved versus nonpreserved sites : a 4-year randomized clinical trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.906~914 (2018)[DOI]
- Barone A, "A randomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets : 3-year results", J Periodontol, 83, pp.836~846 (2012)[DOI]
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Tolstunov L, "Horizontal augmentation through the ridgesplit procedure : a predictable surgical modality in implant reconstruction", J Oral Implantol, 39, pp.59~68 (2013)[DOI]
- Mordenfeld A, "Lateral ridge augmentation with two different ratios of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone : a 2-year follow-up of a randomized and controlled trial", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, pp.884~894 (2017)[DOI]
- Hellem S, "Implant treatment in combination with lateral augmentation of the alveolar process : a 3-year prospective study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.233~240 (2003)[DOI]
- Meloni SM, "Horizontal ridge augmentation using GBR with a native collagen membrane and 1 : 1 ratio of particulate xenograft and autologous bone : a 3-year after final loading prospective clinical study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 21, pp.669~677 (2019)[DOI]
- Le BT, "Simultaneous implant placement and bone grafting with particulate mineralized allograft in sites with buccal wall defects, a three-year follow-up and review of literature", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42, pp.552~559 (2014)[DOI]
- Gielkens PF, "Is there evidence that barrier membranes prevent bone resorption in autologous bone grafts during the healing period? A systematic review", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.390~398 (2007)
- Karoussis IK, "Effect of implant design on survival and success rates of titanium oral implants : a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.8~17 (2004)[DOI]