Histologic Analysis of Ridge Preservation Using Deproteinized Porcine Bone: A Retrospective Human Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: In this retrospective study a histomorphometric analysis was conducted of sites where alveolar ridge preservation was performed using deproteinized porcine bone mineral. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent ridge preservation after extraction were selected in this study. Histomorphometric analysis was performed according to the healing period (24 weeks) and socket location. The proportions of new bone, residual bone graft material, and fibrovascular tissue were calculated. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were compared using the t-test for continuous variables. Results: The healing duration groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .692), residual graft (p = .875), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .619). The non-molar and molar area groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .999), residual graft (p = .638), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .723). The maxilla and mandible groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .185), residual graft (p = .736), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .125). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed between the results of the histomorphometric analysis of the two groups based on the healing duration and location.
Abstract
Purpose: In this retrospective study a histomorphometric analysis was conducted of sites where alveolar ridge preservation was performed using deproteinized porcine bone mineral. Materials and Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent ridge preservation after extraction were selected in this study. Histomorphometric analysis was performed according to the healing period (24 weeks) and socket location. The proportions of new bone, residual bone graft material, and fibrovascular tissue were calculated. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were compared using the t-test for continuous variables. Results: The healing duration groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .692), residual graft (p = .875), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .619). The non-molar and molar area groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .999), residual graft (p = .638), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .723). The maxilla and mandible groups showed no significant differences between the proportions of new bone (p = .185), residual graft (p = .736), and fibrovascular tissue (p = .125). Conclusion: No significant differences were observed between the results of the histomorphometric analysis of the two groups based on the healing duration and location.
참고문헌 (31)
- BaroneA, "Arandomized clinical trial to evaluate and compare implants placed in augmented versus non-augmented extraction sockets:3-year results", J Periodontol, 83, pp.836~846 (2012)
- Misch C, "Contemporary implant dentistry", pp.870~901 (2008), Mosby Elsevier
- Araujo MG, "Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 32, pp.645~652 (2005)
- Horváth A, "Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review", Clin Oral Investig, 17, pp.341~363 (2013)
- Chen ST, "Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction : review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.12~25 (2004)
- Hammerle CH, "Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.80~82 (2012)
- TanWL, "Asystematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.1~21 (2012)
- Nair PR, "Observations on healing of human tooth extraction sockets implanted with bioabsorbablepolylactic-polyglycolicacids(PLGA)copolymerrootreplicas: aclinical, radiographic, and histologic follow-up report of 8 cases", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 97, pp.559~569 (2004)
- Cardaropoli G, "Healing of extraction sockets and surgically produced - augmented and non-augmented - defectsin the alveolarridge. An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 32, pp.435~440 (2005)
- Boix D, "Injectable bone substitute to preserve alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction : a study in dog", J Mater Sci Mater Med, 17, pp.1145~1152 (2006)
- Clavero J, "Ramus or chin graftsfor maxillary sinusinlay and local onlay augmentation : comparison of donorsite morbidity and complications", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 5, pp.154~160 (2003)
- Iasella JM, "Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans", J Periodontol, 74, pp.990~999 (2003)
- Lang NP, "A systematic review on survival and success rates of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sockets after at least 1 year", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.39~66 (2012)
- Vignoletti F, "Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.22~38 (2012)
- Darby I, "Periodontal materials", Aust Dent J, 56, pp.107~118 (2011)
- Mardas N, "Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4:Therapeutic concepts & methods", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.180~201 (2015)
- Cook DC, "Histologic comparison of healing following tooth extraction with ridge preservation using two different xenograft protocols", J Periodontol, 84, pp.585~594 (2013)
- Gholami GA, "Clinical, histologic and histomorphometricevaluationofsocketpreservationusingasyntheticnanocrystallinehydroxyapatite in comparison with a bovine xenograft : a randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, pp.1198~1204 (2012)
- Hoang TN, "Histologic comparison of healing after ridge preservation using human demineralized bone matrix putty with one versus two different‐sized bone particles", J Periodontol, 83, pp.174~181 (2012)
- Serrano Méndez CA, "Comparison of allografts and xenografts used for alveolar ridge preservation. A clinical and histomorphometric RCT in humans", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 19, pp.608~615 (2017)
- Koo TH, "Histologic analysis following grafting of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized bovine or porcine bone mineral: A randomized clinical trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 31, pp.93~102 (2020)
- Iasella JM, "Ridge preservation with freeze‐dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans", J Periodontol, 74, pp.990~999 (2003)
- Leblebicioglu B, "Determinants of alveolar ridge preservation differ by anatomic location", J Clin Periodontol, 40, pp.387~395 (2013)
- De Risi V, "Alveolar ridge preservation techniques : a systematic review and meta-analysis of histological and histomorphometrical data", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26, pp.50~68 (2015)
- Verdugo F, "Facial cortical bone regeneration post-extraction in non-grafted sockets allows for early implant placement and long-term functional stability", Arch Oral Biol, 112, pp.104678~ (2020)
- Turkyilmaz I, "Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability : a human cadaver study", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 11, pp.113~119 (2009)
- Perelman-Karmon M, "Socket site preservation using bovine bone mineral with and without a bioresorbable collagen membrane", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 32, pp.458~465 (2012)
- Nannmark U, "The bone tissue responses to prehydrated and collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone grafts : a study in rabbit maxillary defects", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 10, pp.264~270 (2008)
- Orsini G, "Histologic and ultrastructural analysis of regenerated bone in maxillary sinus augmentation using a porcine bone–derived biomaterial", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1984~1990 (2006)
- BaroneA, "Tissue changes of extraction socketsin humans:a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24, pp.1231~1237 (2013)
- Thalmair T, "Dimensional alterations of extraction sites after different alveolar ridge preservation techniques–a volumetric study", J Clin Periodontol, 40, pp.721~727 (2013)