본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Performance evaluation of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring device (HemoVista) based on multi-channel thoracic impedance plethysmography technology

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: A non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output (CO) can be beneficial in the care of critically ill patients. HemoVista (BiLab Co., Ltd.) is a medical device that measures CO non-invasively using multi-channel impedance plethysmography technology. The purpose of this study was to exploratively evaluate the performance of HemoVista in critically ill patients undergoing CO monitoring with the FloTrac (Edwards Lifesciences).Methods: After non-invasively installing the HemoVista sensor in critically ill patients whose CO was monitored with the FloTrac, CO values measured by both devices were collected for 30 minutes. Cardiac output measured by both devices was selected every 10 seconds, creating approximately 360 data pairs per patient. Linear correlation analysis with Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of HemoVista.Results: A total of 7,138 pairs of CO data from the 20 patients were included in the analysis. A significant correlation was observed between the two methods of measuring CO (Pearson's r=0.489, P<0.001). The mean bias was 1.03 L/min, the 95% CI for the limit of agreement was –1.83 L/min to 3.93 L/min and the percentage error was 55.8%. The concordance rate of time-dependent CO between the two devices was 14.6%.Conclusions: It was observed that the current version of HemoVista has unsuitable performance for use in intensive care units. To be used for critically ill patients, the algorithm must be improved and reevaluated with an enhanced version.

Abstract

Background: A non-invasive method of measuring cardiac output (CO) can be beneficial in the care of critically ill patients. HemoVista (BiLab Co., Ltd.) is a medical device that measures CO non-invasively using multi-channel impedance plethysmography technology. The purpose of this study was to exploratively evaluate the performance of HemoVista in critically ill patients undergoing CO monitoring with the FloTrac (Edwards Lifesciences).Methods: After non-invasively installing the HemoVista sensor in critically ill patients whose CO was monitored with the FloTrac, CO values measured by both devices were collected for 30 minutes. Cardiac output measured by both devices was selected every 10 seconds, creating approximately 360 data pairs per patient. Linear correlation analysis with Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis, and four-quadrant plot analysis were performed to evaluate the performance of HemoVista.Results: A total of 7,138 pairs of CO data from the 20 patients were included in the analysis. A significant correlation was observed between the two methods of measuring CO (Pearson's r=0.489, P<0.001). The mean bias was 1.03 L/min, the 95% CI for the limit of agreement was –1.83 L/min to 3.93 L/min and the percentage error was 55.8%. The concordance rate of time-dependent CO between the two devices was 14.6%.Conclusions: It was observed that the current version of HemoVista has unsuitable performance for use in intensive care units. To be used for critically ill patients, the algorithm must be improved and reevaluated with an enhanced version.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Huygh J, "Hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill : an overview of current cardiac output monitoring methods", F1000Res, 5, pp.F1000 Faculty Rev-2855~ (2016)
  2. Youssef N, "The routine use of the pulmonary artery catheter should be abandoned", Can J Cardiol, 33, pp.135~141 (2017)
  3. Arya VK, "Cardiac output monitoring-invasive and noninvasive", Curr Opin Crit Care, 28, pp.340~347 (2022)
  4. Argueta E, "FloTrac® monitoring system : what are its uses in critically ill medical patients?", Am J Med Sci, 349, pp.352~356 (2015)
  5. McLean AS, "Comparison of cardiac output measurements in critically ill patients : FloTrac", Vigileo vs transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, 2011, pp.39, 590~598
  6. Nuttall G, "Surgical and patient risk factors for severe arterial line complications in adults", Anesthesiology, 124, pp.590~597 (2016)
  7. Sangkum L, "Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement : an update", J Anesth, 30, pp.461~480 (2016)
  8. Ko RE, "Noninvasive beat-to-beat stroke volume measurements to determine preload responsiveness during mini-fluid challenge in a swine model : a preliminary study", Shock, 56, pp.850~856 (2021)
  9. Bland JM, "Measuring agreement in method comparison studies", Stat Methods Med Res, 8, pp.135~160 (1999)
  10. Kanazawa H, "Accuracy and trending ability of blood pressure and cardiac index measured by ClearSight system in patients with reduced ejection fraction", J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 34, pp.3293~3299 (2020)
  11. Critchley LA, "A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques", J Clin Monit Comput, 15, pp.85~91 (1999)
  12. Saugel B, "Tracking changes in cardiac output : statistical considerations on the 4-quadrant plot and the polar plot methodology", Anesth Analg, 121, pp.514~524 (2015)
  13. Mehta Y, "Newer methods of cardiac output monitoring", World J Cardiol, 6, pp.1022~1029 (2014)
  14. Nguyen LS, "Non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output in critical care medicine", Front Med(Lausanne), 4, pp.200~ (2017)
  15. Putensen C, "Electrical impedance tomography for cardio-pulmonary monitoring", J Clin Med, 8, pp.1176~ (2019)
  16. Ulbrich M, "Influence of physiological sources on the impedance cardiogram analyzed using 4D FEM simulations", Physiol Meas, 35, pp.1451~1468 (2014)
  17. Anand G, "Bioimpedance analysis as a tool for hemodynamic monitoring : overview, methods and challenges", Physiol Meas, 42, pp.03TR01~ (2021)
  18. Sanders M, "Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Clin Monit Comput, 34, pp.433~460 (2020)
  19. Van Wyk L, "Accuracy and trending ability of electrical biosensing technology for non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in neonates : a systematic qualitative review", Front Pediatr, 10, pp.851850~ (2022)
  20. Chung CR, "Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output and stroke volume measurements using electrical impedance tomography with invasive methods in a swine model", Sci Rep, 14, pp.2962~ (2024)
  21. Braun F, "Limitations and challenges of EIT-based monitoring of stroke volume and pulmonary artery pressure", Physiol Meas, 39, pp.014003~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor강연승, 구본녀, 김고은, 김선주, 김소연, 윤순영, 정환호연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2019 · 제60권 제8호Clinical decision guidance by an automated, brachial cuff-based cardiac output assessment in patients with shock under treatment: a pilot study in Athens, GreeceAntonios A. Argyris, Athanase D. Protogerou, Dimitrios Mouziouras, Dimitrios Xanthis, Elpida Athanasopoulou, Georgia Mastakoura, Panagiotis Kanatas, Pavlos Vernikos, Theodore G. Papaioannou대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2025 · 제40권 제2호승압제를 사용하는 쇼크 환자에서 맥파전달시간을 이용한 비침습적혈압 측정에 대한 비교 연구박경남, 서상원, 성낙진, 성원영, 양영모, 양희범, 이장영, 홍성엽대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2009 · 제24권 제1호The correlation between carotid artery doppler and stroke volume during central blood volume loss and resuscitationAndrew M. Eib, Isabel Kerrebijn, Jenna L. Taylor, Johnson Bruce D., Jon-Émile S. Kenny, Joseph K. Eibl, Kim Chul-Ho, Mai Elfarnawany, Sarah Atwi대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2024 · 제39권 제1호Utility of Volume Assessment Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Prospective Observational Study김수현, 박기현, 신정호, 황진호대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2017 · 제32권 제3호자발 호흡을 유지하는 정상 성인에서 수동적 하지 거상법 시행 후 혈역학적 변화와 맥박 산소 측정기를 이용한 혈량 파형의 진폭 변이도 조사고재욱, 김인병, 문동석, 박요섭, 이교준, 정상원대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2008 · 제23권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)