본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

침술(鍼術)의 성립에 관한 연구

The Study on the Establishment of Acupuncture

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In ancient china, four famous literatures, Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), Nan Jing (難經), Ben Cao (本草), Shang Han Lun (傷寒論) appeared, which made the foundation of oriental medicine. Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), the book of acupuncture, is the most essential literature among these four litertures. So the question asking the identity of oriental medicine can be turned into the question about the identity of acupuncture. The investigation into origin will not be the only way to study of identity but one of the most attractive means. So we can answer with the study of origin to the question about identity. Acupuncture is comprised of theories like jing mai(經脈), qi xue氣血 and technical factors like moxibustion, bian(砭) which is like present operating knife. To trace the origin of acupuncture, we must investigate not only technical factors but also theories. But it will be impossible to trace every theories underlying the acupuncture in this small thesis. This is the reason that I restricted my attention to the principle of preventive medicine, regimen. Before the excavation of Mawangdui(馬王堆), the belief that acupuncture started long ago before Han(漢) period had been generally accepted. But there was not any proof proving the presence of acupuncture in the excavated literatures representing the Han(漢) period medicine. This fact announced that we must draw the time of establishment of acupuncture back after the 馬王堆 literature buried in B.C. 168. But we can find the proof of the presence of acupuncture just before B.C. 168 in Shiji (史記)written by Si Mi Qian(司馬遷). Through these facts and inferences that we got until now, we can reach a conclusion that acupuncture would have appeared around 190-176 when Chun Yu Yi(淳于意) was practicing as a doctor. As you know, in the 馬王堆 literature, what was associated with jing mai(經脈) was moxibustion. But at the same time, moxibustion was being used just as the experience medicine technique without theory. So the moxibustion would has been about to be associated with 經脈 theory in 馬王堆 period. The word zhen jiu(鍼灸), the acupuncture and moxibustion,means there was a way to reconcile two techniques. It was by assuming bu(補) and handing xie(瀉) over to acupuncture that moxa can coexist with acupuncture. bian(砭) is used for infection treatment more than bloodletting tool in ancient china. but there is a bridge between acupuncture with 砭. Acupuncture inherited its appearance from 砭. It is generally believed that blood-letting is commonly developed in the classic east and west medicine. But the blood-letting could be harmonious with the old chinese belief that vitality must be retained in the body? No. The blood-letting is not generally practiced in ancient china. We can scarcely find the evidence of blood-letting in the ancient literature now in hand except Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經). Blood-Letting widened its territory in ancient chinese medicine with the help of the medical version of wuweierwubuwei(無爲而無不爲) principle which means 'not do anything, then everything does'. But soon lost its territory. Even in the Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), We can find its disappearance. What is the reason? For its disharmony with chinese life idea, 'not lose essence'. Acupuncture replaced the blood-letting. It was the response of the ancient chinese healers to the regimen spirit and harmonious with chinese life view. Regimen spirit, the medical version of '無爲而無不爲' does not pursue cure after being ill but defense before disease. Acupuncture, meeting the demands of time, appeared in pre-han period(前漢期) as the association with jingmai(經脈) theory which may be developed in regimen field, inheritence of moxa's esperience, and the shape of 砭.

Abstract

In ancient china, four famous literatures, Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), Nan Jing (難經), Ben Cao (本草), Shang Han Lun (傷寒論) appeared, which made the foundation of oriental medicine. Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), the book of acupuncture, is the most essential literature among these four litertures. So the question asking the identity of oriental medicine can be turned into the question about the identity of acupuncture. The investigation into origin will not be the only way to study of identity but one of the most attractive means. So we can answer with the study of origin to the question about identity. Acupuncture is comprised of theories like jing mai(經脈), qi xue氣血 and technical factors like moxibustion, bian(砭) which is like present operating knife. To trace the origin of acupuncture, we must investigate not only technical factors but also theories. But it will be impossible to trace every theories underlying the acupuncture in this small thesis. This is the reason that I restricted my attention to the principle of preventive medicine, regimen. Before the excavation of Mawangdui(馬王堆), the belief that acupuncture started long ago before Han(漢) period had been generally accepted. But there was not any proof proving the presence of acupuncture in the excavated literatures representing the Han(漢) period medicine. This fact announced that we must draw the time of establishment of acupuncture back after the 馬王堆 literature buried in B.C. 168. But we can find the proof of the presence of acupuncture just before B.C. 168 in Shiji (史記)written by Si Mi Qian(司馬遷). Through these facts and inferences that we got until now, we can reach a conclusion that acupuncture would have appeared around 190-176 when Chun Yu Yi(淳于意) was practicing as a doctor. As you know, in the 馬王堆 literature, what was associated with jing mai(經脈) was moxibustion. But at the same time, moxibustion was being used just as the experience medicine technique without theory. So the moxibustion would has been about to be associated with 經脈 theory in 馬王堆 period. The word zhen jiu(鍼灸), the acupuncture and moxibustion,means there was a way to reconcile two techniques. It was by assuming bu(補) and handing xie(瀉) over to acupuncture that moxa can coexist with acupuncture. bian(砭) is used for infection treatment more than bloodletting tool in ancient china. but there is a bridge between acupuncture with 砭. Acupuncture inherited its appearance from 砭. It is generally believed that blood-letting is commonly developed in the classic east and west medicine. But the blood-letting could be harmonious with the old chinese belief that vitality must be retained in the body? No. The blood-letting is not generally practiced in ancient china. We can scarcely find the evidence of blood-letting in the ancient literature now in hand except Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經). Blood-Letting widened its territory in ancient chinese medicine with the help of the medical version of wuweierwubuwei(無爲而無不爲) principle which means 'not do anything, then everything does'. But soon lost its territory. Even in the Huang Di Nei Jing (黃帝內經), We can find its disappearance. What is the reason? For its disharmony with chinese life idea, 'not lose essence'. Acupuncture replaced the blood-letting. It was the response of the ancient chinese healers to the regimen spirit and harmonious with chinese life view. Regimen spirit, the medical version of '無爲而無不爲' does not pursue cure after being ill but defense before disease. Acupuncture, meeting the demands of time, appeared in pre-han period(前漢期) as the association with jingmai(經脈) theory which may be developed in regimen field, inheritence of moxa's esperience, and the shape of 砭.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. "黃帝內經", ~
  2. "莊子", ~
  3. "孟子", ~
  4. "史記·扁鵲倉公傳", ~
  5. "鶡冠子·世賢", ~
  6. "脈法", ~
  7. "五十二病方", ~
  8. "足臂十一脈灸經", ~
  9. "南史", ~
  10. "韓非子·安危", ~
  11. 강신주, "장자의 철학" (2004), 태학사
  12. 加納喜光, "몸으로 보는 중국사상" (1999), 소나무
  13. 박태열, "馬王堆醫書, 黃帝內經, 金?要略에 나타난 中國 古代 外治療法", 동의생리병리학회지, 16(4), pp.1~625 (2002), 대한동의병리학회
  14. 山田慶兒, "중국의학은 어떻게 시작되었는가" (2002), 사이언스북스
  15. 이강범, "칠략 분류로 본 마왕퇴 출토 백서 연구", 중국어문학논집, (30), pp.351~376 (2005), 중국어문학연구회
  16. Anne Harrington, "마음은 몸으로 말을 한다" (2009), 살림
  17. 小曾戶洋, "五十二病方" (2007), 東方書店
  18. 森田傳一郞, "史記扁鵲倉公列傳譯註" (1986), 雄山閣出判
  19. 山田慶兒, "中國醫學の起源" (1999), 岩波書店
  20. 丸山敏秋, "黃帝內經と中國古代醫學" (1988), 東京美術
  21. 區結成, "한의학 서양의학을 만나다" (2010), 군자출판사
  22. 馬伯英, "中國醫學文化史" (1994), 上海人民出版社
  23. 廖育群, "岐黃醫道" (1997), 遼寧敎育出版社
  24. 馬繼興, "馬王堆古醫書考釋" (1992), 湖南科學技術出版社
  25. 周一謨, "馬王堆醫書考注" (1989), 樂群文化事業有限公司
  26. 李建民, "死生之域" (2000), 中央硏究院
  27. Epler, D. C., "Bloodletting in Early Chinese Medicine and its Relation to the Origin of Acupuncture", Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 54 (1980)
  28. Kuriyama, Shigehisa, "The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine" (2002), zone book

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)