본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

선교의사 알렌(Horace N. Allen)의 의료 활동과 조선인의 몸에 대한 인식 고찰

A Study on Horace N. Allen's Medicine and Recognition of Korean Body

1

조회

0

다운로드

11

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

Je Jung Won(濟衆院) was the first modern-style Government hospital built by the Korean King Ko-Jong(高宗) in April 1885, and it was the medical missionary Horace Newton Allen(1858~1932) who made one of the greatest contributions to the establishment of the hospital. Allen was an American missionary. He graduated from Ohio Wesleyan University with a degree in theology in 1881, and completed one-yearcourse at Miami Medical College. In Korea and America he worked as a physician, a missionary, an American diplomatic minister to Korea and a Korean minister's secretary to America. While acting as a mediator between Korea and America, he knew and recorded the domestic and foreign situation of Korea during Gaehwagi(開化期 : the civilized and enlightened age). Thus to study him is to understand Korea's Gaehwagi as well as to research American medical missionaries. During his stay in Korea(1884~1905), Allen steadily wrote diaries and letters about Korean politics, diplomacy, society, culture, and medicine. Thus his public/private record through diaries and letters(the quantity of these materials amounts to several thousands) supplements the Korean early modern era's historical record. However, until now these materials have received little scholarly attention from researchers except for a few historians of missionary work between Korea and America, or of Korean modern medicine. I intended to use these materials to suggest a new perspective on the study of Korean Gaehwagi. Allen, along with John W. Heron, who came to Seoul on June 21st 1885,treated about 10,460 Korean patients in the first year of the opening of JeJungWon. They made "the first annual report of the Korean Government Hospital". This report explained how Allen and Heron regarded and treated Korean patients. Allen's diaries, letters and other writings offer a realistic view of how the western people actually recognized the Korean people at that time. As a western doctor, Allen had an ambivalent attitude toward Korean medical concepts and systems. On the one hand, he thought that medical idea, some food and drug of Korean is valuable. He said that the native Korea faculty had some good ideas with regards to treatment. And he held Korean rice, ginseng, and so on in high regard. However, he did not rate Korean acupuncture and Korean traditional ointment at all. In addition, he sometimes cured Korean patients dangerously and with imprudence. The amputation of patients' body, no matter how little, must ask the permission of the patients themselves. Especially, the sense of Korean filial duty(孝) couldn't accept amputation of body at those times. The artificial change of body meant to hurt parents' body, because at those times Korean people thought that my body was my parent's possession. But Allen did it without enough explanation or persuasion. Moreover he didn't feel guilty for the behavior at all. Besides, he seemed to be proud of it in the above mention. Such careless or unethical behavior cannot be excused. On the other hand, he had made mistakes in treatment according to his record. He pulled out some healthy teeth of patients who had a bad toothache. But he didn't explain nor apologize the mistake. Besides, he refused treatment of patients until the hospital would be opened in order to push Korean government to prepare hospital quickly. Why or how did he do that? The first answer available to the question,he might be so confident of his medical knowledge and skill that he didn't feel the need to ask the patients' thought and will. However, as stated above, his medical study was just one year. And he worried about his inexperience of surgery. Thus the first assumption seems to be false. He wasn't confident of his medical knowledge. The fact that nevertheless Allen treated Korean patients at his will, is still blamable. The second assumption is that he regarded western modern medicine as the only correct and proper approach. He didn't have many experiences,but his west modern medicine made him proud of its achievement. After middle 19th century of modern times, Micheal Foucault said at The Birth of Clinics, western modern medicine believed itself scientific on the ground that west modern medicine could have pathology and surgery. Allen might also trust the scientific ability of western modern medicine. So he might think that he didn't need to explain 'modern and scientific' medicine of West to people in 'premodern and non-scientific' medicine of Korea. The third answer is his 'Orientalism'. He thought that Koreans were dirty,lazy, and barbarous and, therefore, he made a clear distinction between Caucasian and Korean. He set his affection on 'Cho-Seon(朝鮮)' and made efforts to cure Korean patients and establish the first western Government hospital in Korea. However he, as a westerner, could not free himself from ‘Orientalism’ and ‘Imperialism’. Thus, he might ride so roughshod Korean patients. In fact the ‘Orientalism’ was not only Allen’s thought. Many western visitors thought Korean as an ‘Orient’. The West regarded themselves as civilized and the East as uncivilized or barbarous, therefore the West thought that the East should be modernized with the help of the West. This thought rationalized their imperialism and colonialism toward the East. In addition, he seemed to have some ambition in politics and diplomatics. He wanted to be a high-ranking official, so his goal of his life was political or economical power rather than medical missionary.

Abstract

Je Jung Won(濟衆院) was the first modern-style Government hospital built by the Korean King Ko-Jong(高宗) in April 1885, and it was the medical missionary Horace Newton Allen(1858~1932) who made one of the greatest contributions to the establishment of the hospital. Allen was an American missionary. He graduated from Ohio Wesleyan University with a degree in theology in 1881, and completed one-yearcourse at Miami Medical College. In Korea and America he worked as a physician, a missionary, an American diplomatic minister to Korea and a Korean minister's secretary to America. While acting as a mediator between Korea and America, he knew and recorded the domestic and foreign situation of Korea during Gaehwagi(開化期 : the civilized and enlightened age). Thus to study him is to understand Korea's Gaehwagi as well as to research American medical missionaries. During his stay in Korea(1884~1905), Allen steadily wrote diaries and letters about Korean politics, diplomacy, society, culture, and medicine. Thus his public/private record through diaries and letters(the quantity of these materials amounts to several thousands) supplements the Korean early modern era's historical record. However, until now these materials have received little scholarly attention from researchers except for a few historians of missionary work between Korea and America, or of Korean modern medicine. I intended to use these materials to suggest a new perspective on the study of Korean Gaehwagi. Allen, along with John W. Heron, who came to Seoul on June 21st 1885,treated about 10,460 Korean patients in the first year of the opening of JeJungWon. They made "the first annual report of the Korean Government Hospital". This report explained how Allen and Heron regarded and treated Korean patients. Allen's diaries, letters and other writings offer a realistic view of how the western people actually recognized the Korean people at that time. As a western doctor, Allen had an ambivalent attitude toward Korean medical concepts and systems. On the one hand, he thought that medical idea, some food and drug of Korean is valuable. He said that the native Korea faculty had some good ideas with regards to treatment. And he held Korean rice, ginseng, and so on in high regard. However, he did not rate Korean acupuncture and Korean traditional ointment at all. In addition, he sometimes cured Korean patients dangerously and with imprudence. The amputation of patients' body, no matter how little, must ask the permission of the patients themselves. Especially, the sense of Korean filial duty(孝) couldn't accept amputation of body at those times. The artificial change of body meant to hurt parents' body, because at those times Korean people thought that my body was my parent's possession. But Allen did it without enough explanation or persuasion. Moreover he didn't feel guilty for the behavior at all. Besides, he seemed to be proud of it in the above mention. Such careless or unethical behavior cannot be excused. On the other hand, he had made mistakes in treatment according to his record. He pulled out some healthy teeth of patients who had a bad toothache. But he didn't explain nor apologize the mistake. Besides, he refused treatment of patients until the hospital would be opened in order to push Korean government to prepare hospital quickly. Why or how did he do that? The first answer available to the question,he might be so confident of his medical knowledge and skill that he didn't feel the need to ask the patients' thought and will. However, as stated above, his medical study was just one year. And he worried about his inexperience of surgery. Thus the first assumption seems to be false. He wasn't confident of his medical knowledge. The fact that nevertheless Allen treated Korean patients at his will, is still blamable. The second assumption is that he regarded western modern medicine as the only correct and proper approach. He didn't have many experiences,but his west modern medicine made him proud of its achievement. After middle 19th century of modern times, Micheal Foucault said at The Birth of Clinics, western modern medicine believed itself scientific on the ground that west modern medicine could have pathology and surgery. Allen might also trust the scientific ability of western modern medicine. So he might think that he didn't need to explain 'modern and scientific' medicine of West to people in 'premodern and non-scientific' medicine of Korea. The third answer is his 'Orientalism'. He thought that Koreans were dirty,lazy, and barbarous and, therefore, he made a clear distinction between Caucasian and Korean. He set his affection on 'Cho-Seon(朝鮮)' and made efforts to cure Korean patients and establish the first western Government hospital in Korea. However he, as a westerner, could not free himself from ‘Orientalism’ and ‘Imperialism’. Thus, he might ride so roughshod Korean patients. In fact the ‘Orientalism’ was not only Allen’s thought. Many western visitors thought Korean as an ‘Orient’. The West regarded themselves as civilized and the East as uncivilized or barbarous, therefore the West thought that the East should be modernized with the help of the West. This thought rationalized their imperialism and colonialism toward the East. In addition, he seemed to have some ambition in politics and diplomatics. He wanted to be a high-ranking official, so his goal of his life was political or economical power rather than medical missionary.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. H. N. 알렌, "알렌의 일기" (1991), 단국대학교 출판부
  2. H. N. 알렌, "조선견문기" (1999), 집문당
  3. H. N. 알렌, "알렌의 선교 외교편지(1884-1905)" (2007), 장로회 신학대학교 부설 한국교회사연구원
  4. J. W. 헤론, "헤론 의사의 선교편지" (2007), 한국교회사연구원
  5. 김운용, "꼬레아 꼬레아니" (1996), 서울시립대학교부설서울학연구소
  6. 셔우드 홀, "닥터 홀의 조선 회상" (2006), 좋은 씨앗
  7. 정성화, "서양인의 조선살이" (2008), 푸른역사
  8. 제임스 게일, "코리언 스케치" (1971), 현암사
  9. 조지 길모어, "서울풍물지" (1999), 집문당
  10. First Annual Report of the Korean Government Hospital, "H. N. Allen", ~ (1886)
  11. B. S. 터너, "몸과 사회" (2002), 몸과마음사
  12. 김윤성, "개화기 개신교 의료선교와 몸에 대한 인식틀의 ‘근대적’ 전환", 석사, pp.1994
  13. 김일순, "제중원에서의 초기 의학교육(1885-1908)", 연세의사학, 2(2) (1998)
  14. 김종갑, "근대적 몸과 탈근대적 증상" (2008), 나남
  15. 홍성민, "근대성과 육체의 정치학" (2003), 東文選
  16. 문정난, "한말 한미관계에 대한 일고찰: 알렌의 이권활동을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1993
  17. 미셸 푸코, "임상의학의 탄생" (2006), 이매진
  18. 민경배, "알렌의 선교와 근대한미외교" (1991), 연세대학교 출판부
  19. 박승희, "근대 초기 매체의 세계 인식과 문학사", 한민족어문학(구 영남어문학), (53), pp.75~98 (2008), 한민족어문학회
  20. 백낙준, "한국개신교사" (1979), 연세대 출판부
  21. 손정숙, "한국 근대 주한 미국공사 연구(1883-1905)", 박사, pp.2004
  22. 신동원, "호열자, 조선을 습격하다 : 몸과 의학의 한국사" (2004), 역사비평사
  23. 신재의, "알렌의 의료활동과 제중원의 설립", 연세의사학, 8(1) (2004)
  24. 에드워드 W. 사이드, "오리엔탈리즘" (2000), 교보문고
  25. 여인석, "한말과 일제시기 선교의사들의 전통의학 인식과 연구", 의사학, 15(1), pp.1~22 (2006), 대한의사학회
  26. 여인석, "한말과 식민지 시기의 서양의학과 한의학 인식과 수용", 의사학, 16(2), pp.161~176 (2007), 대한의사학회
  27. 윤희창, "알렌의 의료선교에 관한 연구: 제중원을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
  28. 이기원, "제중원" (2009), 삼성출판사
  29. 이만열, "한국 기독교 의료사" (2003), 아카넷
  30. 이방원, "보구여관(保救女館)의 설립과 활동", 의사학, 17(1), pp.37~55 (2008), 대한의사학회
  31. 이승환, "우리 안의 오리엔탈리즘, In 유교담론의 지형학-근대 이후 유교 담론에 관한 정치철학적 고찰" (2004), 푸른숲
  32. 이영아, "육체의 탄생" (2008), 민음사
  33. 이영아, "1910년대 조선인의 타자의 몸에 대한 시선 고찰 - 잡지 <청춘>, <학지광>을 중심으로", 한국문화, (49), pp.249~273 (2010), 규장각한국학연구원
  34. 이영아, "서양인의 눈에 비친 조선인의 인종적 특질 연구-새비지 랜도어의 <고요한 아침의 나라 조선>을 중심으로", 호모 미그란스, 3 (2010)
  35. 조영렬, "재한선교사와 한국독립운동", 한국기독교사연구회소식, 29 (1990)
  36. 조이제, "감리교의 서울 지역 초기 의료 선교, In 한국 기독교와 초기 의료선교" (2007), 한국기독교역사문화연구소
  37. 조형근, "일제의 공식의료와 개신교 선교의료간 헤게모니 경쟁과 그 사회적 효과", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), (82), pp.123~165 (2009), 한국사회사학회
  38. 존 퓰츠, "사진에 나타난 몸" (2000), 예경
  39. 최근덕, "죽음의 사상, In 한국 유학사상 연구" (1992), 철학과 현실사
  40. 콜린고든, "권력과 지식: 미셸 푸코와의 대담" (1995), 나남

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)