자비에르 비샤의 의학사상: 프랑스 생기론의 역사적 맥락에서
Xavier Bichat’s Medical Thought in the Historical Context of French Vitalism
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The French vitalism is different from vitalism in general. It is a position of some physiologists who worked from the end of the 18th century to the early days of the 19th century, defending the peculiarity of life phenomena in contrast to the Cartesian theory of the animal-machine. Its main representatives are Paul-Joseph Barthez and Théophile de Bordeu, who belonged to the vitalist school of Montpellier. They argue, in contrast to mechanism, that life involves a special principle and cannot be explained in terms of physical and chemical properties alone. Marie François Xavier Bichat (1771-1802), inheriting this position, endeavored to establish physiology as a science which cannot be reduced to the physical sciences. He was also the first to introduce the notion of tissues as distinct entities. The aim of his concept of physiology is to explain the whole of life phenomena through the ultimate properties of tissues, that is, through sensibility and contractility. After Bichat, François Magendie inherited his experimental concepts, but critiqued his vitalism. Claude Bernard, known as the founder of experimental physiology, was influenced considerably by Bichat’s idea of physiology. Through the notion of tissues, he unites zoology, botany and medicine in the domain of general physiology. Additionally, his concept of “milieu intérieur” results from his study of Bichat’s physiology, particularly from the concept of the “natural type”.
Abstract
The French vitalism is different from vitalism in general. It is a position of some physiologists who worked from the end of the 18th century to the early days of the 19th century, defending the peculiarity of life phenomena in contrast to the Cartesian theory of the animal-machine. Its main representatives are Paul-Joseph Barthez and Théophile de Bordeu, who belonged to the vitalist school of Montpellier. They argue, in contrast to mechanism, that life involves a special principle and cannot be explained in terms of physical and chemical properties alone. Marie François Xavier Bichat (1771-1802), inheriting this position, endeavored to establish physiology as a science which cannot be reduced to the physical sciences. He was also the first to introduce the notion of tissues as distinct entities. The aim of his concept of physiology is to explain the whole of life phenomena through the ultimate properties of tissues, that is, through sensibility and contractility. After Bichat, François Magendie inherited his experimental concepts, but critiqued his vitalism. Claude Bernard, known as the founder of experimental physiology, was influenced considerably by Bichat’s idea of physiology. Through the notion of tissues, he unites zoology, botany and medicine in the domain of general physiology. Additionally, his concept of “milieu intérieur” results from his study of Bichat’s physiology, particularly from the concept of the “natural type”.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Anatomie générale appliquée à la physiologie et à la médecine(4 volumes)", Brosson, Gabon et Cie, Paris an X, ~ (1801)
- "Recherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort, et autres textes, Présentation, notes, bibliographie et chronomogie par André Pichot", GF-Flammarion, ~ (1994)
- Recherches physiologiques sur la vie et la mort, "précédée d’une notice sur la vie et les travaux de Bichat et suivi de notes par le docteur Cerise" (1866), Charpentier
- 여인석, "라메트리의 인간기계론과 뇌의 문제", 의철학연구, 7, pp.81~98 (2009), 한국의철학회
- 한기원, "클로드 베르나르의 일반생리학: 형성과정과 배경", 의사학, 19(2), pp.507~552 (2010), 대한의사학회
- 한희진, "폴‐조제프 바르테즈(1734∼1806)의 생기론", 의사학, 19(1), pp.157~188 (2010), 대한의사학회
- Barthez, Paul-Joseph, "Nouveax éléments de la science de l’homme (1778), t. I, II" (1806), Goujon et Brunot
- Bernard, Claude, "Principe de la médecine expérimentale" (1847), Baillère
- Bernard, Claude, "Bernard, Claude, Introduction à l’étude de la médecine expérimentale" (1966), Garnier-Flammarion
- Bernard, Claude, "Bernard, Claude, Leçon sur les phénomènes de la vie communs aux animaux et végétaux" (1878), Baillère
- Canguilhem, George, "Connaissance de la vie", Vrin, ~ (1989)
- Canguilhem, George, "정상적인 것과 병리적인 것" (1999), 인간사랑
- Canguilhem, George, "Etudes d’histoire et de philosophie des sciences" (1994), Vrin
- Cazeneuve, Jean, "La philosophie médicale de Ravaisson" (1958), P.U.F.
- Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de, "Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines" (1973), Edition Galilée
- Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de, "Corpus des Oeuvres de Philosophie en lanue française" (1984), Fayard
- Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de, "Traité des animaux" (1984), Fayard
- Comte, Auguste, "Cours de philosophie positive I-VI (1830-42)", ~ (1842)
- Delbos, Victor, "La philosophie française" (1919), Plon
- Duchesneau, François, "La physiologie des lumières, Empirisme, Modèle et Théories" (1982), Nijhoff publishers
- Huneman, Philippe, "Bichat, La vie et la mort" (1998), P.U.F.
- Pichot, André, "Histoire de la notion de vie" (1993), Gallimard
- Roselyne, Rey, "Diderot et les sciences de la vie dans l’Encyclopédie", Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie, 18(19) (1995)
- Stahl, Georges Ernest, "Oeuvres médicco-philosophiques et pratiques, traduction de T. Blondin (6 volumes)" (1864), Baillère