본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

부양학파, 한국 전통 의학 학술 유파의 탄생과 전승: 이규준, 서병오, 이원세 그리고 소문학회

Birth and Succession of A Current of Learning in Korean Medicine: The Supporting Yang Current of Learning

오재근
대한의사학회 (The Korean Society For The History Of Medicine)|2014.04|의사학 (Korean Journal of Medical History)|제23권 제1호|pp. 57-98|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2014.23.57

0

조회

0

다운로드

17

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Traditional korean medicine이제마사상의학학파이규준전통 의학Lee Gyoojoon (李圭晙)부양학파부양론Current of learning (學派)Supporting yang current of learning (扶陽學派)Supporting yang theory (扶陽論)Lee Jema (李濟馬)
주제분류역사학

초록

In this study, I aim to reveal how Lee Gyoojoon (李圭晙)’s medicine hasgiven birth to a current of learning, the supporting yang current of learning(扶陽學派), and describe its historical significance. Before anything, I’d like to throw the question of whether if there were any currents within the traditional Korean medicine. There are no records of medical currents being widely discussed until now in medical historyof Korea; however, the current of Lee Jema (李濟馬)’s sasang medicine(四象醫學派) is the most noticeable one. Among the contemporaries of Lee Jema, during the late Chosun (朝鮮), there was also another famed medical practitioner called Lee Gyoojoon. Lee Gyoojoon mainly practiced his medicine within Pohang (浦項), Gyeongsangbuk-do area, his apprentices have formed a group and have succeeded his medical practice. Based on the analyses of Lee Gyoojoon’s apprentices and the Somun Oriental Medical Society (素問學會), which is known as a successor group to Lee Gyoojoon’s medicine today, they are fully satisfying the five requirements to establish a medical current: first, they held Lee Gyoojoon as the first and foremost, representative practitioner of their current; second, they advocate the supporting yang theory (扶陽論) suggested by Lee Gyoojoon,which is originated from his theory of Mind (心學); third, books such as the Major Essentials of Huangdi’s Internal Classic Plain Questions (素問大要),and the Double Grinded Medical Mirror (醫鑑重磨), were being used as themain textbooks to educate their students or to practice medicine. Fourth, LeeGyoojoon’s medical ideas were being transcended quite clearly within his group of apprentices, including Seo Byungoh (徐丙五), Lee Wonse (李元世), and the Somun Oriental Medical Society. Fifth, Lee Gyoojoon’s apprentices were first produced through the Sukgok School (石谷書堂), however, nowadays theyare being produced through medical groups formed by Lee Wonse, the SomunOriental Medical Society, regarding the propagation of medical theories,compilation of textbooks, publication of academic journals, etc. Then, what do the existence of the supporting yang current have their significances in history? First of all, Heo Joon (許浚), the great medical practitioner in 16th century Chosun, have revealed through his book the Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TMEM), that the essenceof Eastern medicine differentiated from South and North medicine of China is being transcended in Korean medicine. However, we have not got aclear conclusion on what his views of the essence of Eastern medicine is. The TMEM is the legacy of Neo-confucianism, dominant in the Chosun at the time, and is considered the reference which covers from Taoism to Korean Medicine, that is practical as well as systematical in categorizing illnesses, their respective prescriptions, and herbs. Maybe, it seems that such characteristics of the TMEM naturally led the medical practitioners and Confucian scholars, Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon to adopt its principles,and furthermore, possibly contributed in materializing the tradition of Eastern Medicine. Secondly, both currents appeared in the late periodof Chosun dynasty. Then, weren’t there any preceding medical currents before them? The bureaucratic and centralized government of the Chosundynasty demanded and supplied talents through a nationwide examination system (科擧). However, since the late-16th century, a few family from the Chungin (中人) class have come to dominate the important medical positions as inheritance doctors (世醫), bringing about the expansion of the private medical sector, as well as growth in the number of medical practitioners. This naturally brought about fierce competition among the practitioners, and it is probable that the competition sparked the need for standardized groups and societies that follow a single medical doctrine or theory, to differentiate from the others. Probably, the birth of current of learning, which succeeded to Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon’s medical theory, exists as an extension of this social background. The major changes in systems to build a new Chosun in 1894 brought about the abolitions of old and antique institutions. Inheritance doctors naturally collapsed, and every medical practitioners had to compete inan open market. However, Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon, as a medical practitioner and Confucian scholar, weren’t from medical families;instead, they have successfully established and led their medical groups. The Sasang medicine current, which first began in the Hamhung (咸興) area, had creative medical theories and excellent practices, naturally led the discourses traditional medicine in the center areas of the Korean peninsula. In contrast, the supporting yang current, more popular in theYoungnam (嶺南) area at one time, struggled to keep their current duringthe period of Korean War, National Industrialization and Modernization. And it was only Lee Wonse’s personal dedication to the current that madeit survive through the times. It was not until the late 1990s, when the apprentices have gathered Lee Gyoojoon’s accomplishments, that formed the Somun Oriental Medical Society as well as the supporting yang current. In summary, the birth and the succession of the supporting yang current clearly depicts how the various traditional medical groups and societies on the periphery have survived and transcended through difficult times. Andat the same time, they can provide chance to ruminate the historical flow of traditional medicine in Korea.

Abstract

In this study, I aim to reveal how Lee Gyoojoon (李圭晙)’s medicine hasgiven birth to a current of learning, the supporting yang current of learning(扶陽學派), and describe its historical significance. Before anything, I’d like to throw the question of whether if there were any currents within the traditional Korean medicine. There are no records of medical currents being widely discussed until now in medical historyof Korea; however, the current of Lee Jema (李濟馬)’s sasang medicine(四象醫學派) is the most noticeable one. Among the contemporaries of Lee Jema, during the late Chosun (朝鮮), there was also another famed medical practitioner called Lee Gyoojoon. Lee Gyoojoon mainly practiced his medicine within Pohang (浦項), Gyeongsangbuk-do area, his apprentices have formed a group and have succeeded his medical practice. Based on the analyses of Lee Gyoojoon’s apprentices and the Somun Oriental Medical Society (素問學會), which is known as a successor group to Lee Gyoojoon’s medicine today, they are fully satisfying the five requirements to establish a medical current: first, they held Lee Gyoojoon as the first and foremost, representative practitioner of their current; second, they advocate the supporting yang theory (扶陽論) suggested by Lee Gyoojoon,which is originated from his theory of Mind (心學); third, books such as the Major Essentials of Huangdi’s Internal Classic Plain Questions (素問大要),and the Double Grinded Medical Mirror (醫鑑重磨), were being used as themain textbooks to educate their students or to practice medicine. Fourth, LeeGyoojoon’s medical ideas were being transcended quite clearly within his group of apprentices, including Seo Byungoh (徐丙五), Lee Wonse (李元世), and the Somun Oriental Medical Society. Fifth, Lee Gyoojoon’s apprentices were first produced through the Sukgok School (石谷書堂), however, nowadays theyare being produced through medical groups formed by Lee Wonse, the SomunOriental Medical Society, regarding the propagation of medical theories,compilation of textbooks, publication of academic journals, etc. Then, what do the existence of the supporting yang current have their significances in history? First of all, Heo Joon (許浚), the great medical practitioner in 16th century Chosun, have revealed through his book the Treasured Mirror of Eastern Medicine (東醫寶鑑, TMEM), that the essenceof Eastern medicine differentiated from South and North medicine of China is being transcended in Korean medicine. However, we have not got aclear conclusion on what his views of the essence of Eastern medicine is. The TMEM is the legacy of Neo-confucianism, dominant in the Chosun at the time, and is considered the reference which covers from Taoism to Korean Medicine, that is practical as well as systematical in categorizing illnesses, their respective prescriptions, and herbs. Maybe, it seems that such characteristics of the TMEM naturally led the medical practitioners and Confucian scholars, Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon to adopt its principles,and furthermore, possibly contributed in materializing the tradition of Eastern Medicine. Secondly, both currents appeared in the late periodof Chosun dynasty. Then, weren’t there any preceding medical currents before them? The bureaucratic and centralized government of the Chosundynasty demanded and supplied talents through a nationwide examination system (科擧). However, since the late-16th century, a few family from the Chungin (中人) class have come to dominate the important medical positions as inheritance doctors (世醫), bringing about the expansion of the private medical sector, as well as growth in the number of medical practitioners. This naturally brought about fierce competition among the practitioners, and it is probable that the competition sparked the need for standardized groups and societies that follow a single medical doctrine or theory, to differentiate from the others. Probably, the birth of current of learning, which succeeded to Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon’s medical theory, exists as an extension of this social background. The major changes in systems to build a new Chosun in 1894 brought about the abolitions of old and antique institutions. Inheritance doctors naturally collapsed, and every medical practitioners had to compete inan open market. However, Lee Jema and Lee Gyoojoon, as a medical practitioner and Confucian scholar, weren’t from medical families;instead, they have successfully established and led their medical groups. The Sasang medicine current, which first began in the Hamhung (咸興) area, had creative medical theories and excellent practices, naturally led the discourses traditional medicine in the center areas of the Korean peninsula. In contrast, the supporting yang current, more popular in theYoungnam (嶺南) area at one time, struggled to keep their current duringthe period of Korean War, National Industrialization and Modernization. And it was only Lee Wonse’s personal dedication to the current that madeit survive through the times. It was not until the late 1990s, when the apprentices have gathered Lee Gyoojoon’s accomplishments, that formed the Somun Oriental Medical Society as well as the supporting yang current. In summary, the birth and the succession of the supporting yang current clearly depicts how the various traditional medical groups and societies on the periphery have survived and transcended through difficult times. Andat the same time, they can provide chance to ruminate the historical flow of traditional medicine in Korea.

참고문헌 (115)

  1. "東醫寶鑑", ~
  2. "東醫壽世保元", ~
  3. "石谷散稿", ~
  4. "石谷心書", ~
  5. "素問句讀俗解", ~
  6. "歷試漫筆", ~
  7. "醫鑑重磨", ~
  8. "黃帝內經素問大要", ~
  9. "欽英", ~
  10. 京鄕新聞, "戰慄 속의 自由雰圍氣 테로·脅迫·投石等", 京鄕新聞, 1954년 5월 20일, ~
  11. 京鄕新聞, "맛을 잃은 소금 李雨茁", 京鄕新聞, 1956년 2월 2일, ~
  12. 東亞日報, "李雨茁等 9名에 實刑", 東亞日報, 1959년 9월 8일, ~
  13. 東明, "扶陽論", 시사주보 『東明』 2 임시호, 1923년 4월 15일, ~
  14. 東西醫學硏究會, "會員名簿", 東西醫學硏究會月報 2, 1924년 2월 29일, ~
  15. 東西醫學硏究會, "技倆證明書授與者", 東西醫學硏究會月報 4, 1924년 3월 30일, ~
  16. 방성혜, "조선 후기 실존인물 백광현의 행적(3)", 민족의학신문, 2013년 10월 17일, ~
  17. 안상우, "고의서산책 71 『素問句讀俗解』", 민족의학신문, 2001년 5월 28일, ~
  18. 임광순, "이야기로 풀어가는 정치야사 <28>」", 전북중앙신문, 2003년 5월 15일, ~
  19. 최남선, "朝鮮歷史講話 51", 東亞日報, 1930년 3월 15일, ~
  20. 황연규, "조선시대 儒醫의 산실-경북 대구 지역 한의계 열전(1)", 한의신문, 2010년 4월 15일, ~
  21. "소문학회 홈페이지"[URL]
  22. "승정원일기"[URL]
  23. "조선왕조실록"[URL]
  24. "조선총독부 관보활용시스템"[URL]
  25. "한국고전종합DB"[URL]
  26. "한의고전명서"[URL]
  27. "오재근, 김광하 인터뷰", 오재근, 김광하 인터뷰, 2013년 3월 25일, ~
  28. "오재근, 이우덕 인터뷰", 오재근, 이우덕 인터뷰, 2013년 6월 22일, ~
  29. "오재근·김태국, 안예섭 인터뷰", 오재근·김태국, 안예섭 인터뷰, 2013년 1월 22일, ~
  30. "오재근·김태국, 이국형 인터뷰", 오재근·김태국, 이국형 인터뷰, 2013년 2월 24일, ~
  31. "오재근, 김태국, 피국현, 최춘길 인터뷰", 오재근, 김태국, 피국현, 최춘길 인터뷰, 2013년 1월 12일, ~
  32. "오재근, 김태국, 정태욱, 피국현, 황원덕, 이종섭 인터뷰", 오재근, 김태국, 정태욱, 피국현, 황원덕, 이종섭 인터뷰, 2013년 8월 18일, ~
  33. 소문학회, "이원세 동영상 강좌 14", 이원세 동영상 강좌 14, 57-1, ~
  34. 慶尙北道韓醫師會, "慶尙北道漢醫師會會員名簿", 慶尙北道韓醫師會會誌, (창간) (1959)
  35. 權大雄, "韓末 嶺南 儒學界의 의병 활동", 민족문화연구총서, (21) (1998)
  36. 권오민, "석곡 이규준의 인간관과 의학론 연구", 박사, 의사학(한의학), pp.2010
  37. 권오민, "『醫鑑重磨』의 판본 및 구성에 대한 연구", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 16(1), pp.1~9 (2010), 한국한의학연구원
  38. 권오영, "19세기 嶺南 理學의 전개와 그 실천적 성향", 국학연구, (9) (2006)
  39. 김남일, "韓國韓醫學의 學術流派에 關한 試論", 한국의사학회지, 17(2), pp.3~25 (2004), 한국의사학회
  40. 김두종, "한국의학사" (1966), 탐구당
  41. 김성수, "16~17세기 朝鮮 儒學者들의 人體에 대한 理解 -『東醫寶鑑』의 受容과 性理學적 變容-", 한국의사학회지, 20(2), pp.50~64 (2007), 한국의사학회
  42. 김성수, "朝鮮後期 私的 醫療의 성장과 醫業에 대한 인식 전환", 의사학, 18(1), pp.43~68 (2009), 대한의사학회
  43. 김성수, "朝鮮時代 醫員의 변화와 自己意識 형성", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 17(2), pp.1~16 (2011), 한국한의학연구원
  44. 김 적, "이규준의 생애와 學說에 관한 考察", 석사, pp.1979
  45. 김종석, "한말 영남 유학계의 동향과 지역별 특징", 국학연구, (4) (2004)
  46. 김지영, "석재 서병오(1862~1936)의 서화 연구", 석사, 미술사학, pp.2010
  47. 김창건, "石谷 李圭晙의 생애에 대한 연구", 2009년 대한한의학원전학회 정기학술대회 (2009)
  48. 김창건, "『석곡심서』를 통해 본 『황제내경소문대요』의 독창성 연구", 박사, 한의학과 원전학전공, pp.2014
  49. 김태우, "과거의 의서에서부터 당대의 실천까지 : 『소문대요』, 소문학회, 그리고 동아시아 의학전통의 전승을 바라보는 의료인류학적 시선", 한국의사학회지, 26(1), pp.9~18 (2013), 한국의사학회
  50. 김항회, "내가 아는 石齋 徐丙五", 월간까마, (3) (2000)
  51. 김호, "허준의 동의보감 연구" (2000), 일지사
  52. 東洋醫學學術會, "第七回漢醫師國家試驗合格者名單", 東方醫藥, (3) (1957)
  53. 류준경, "達板 坊刻本 연구", 한국문화, (35), pp.57~87 (2005), 규장각한국학연구원
  54. 박경용, "전통의료 구술자료 집성 1 - 대구약령시 원로 한의약업인 6인의 의약업과 삶 -" (2011), 경인문화사
  55. 朴根述, "石齋의 生涯 硏究", 한양여자대학논문집, (13) (1990)
  56. 박상영, "石谷 李奎晙의 『浦上奇聞』과 石谷의 對西洋 認識", 한국한의학연구원논문집, 16(2), pp.65~73 (2010), 한국한의학연구원
  57. 박훈평, "19세기 후반 典醫監 醫學生徒에 대한 고찰 -『前銜生徒案』을 중심으로 -", 한국의사학회지, 26(1), pp.1~7 (2013), 한국의사학회
  58. 石齋詩書畵集刊行委員會, "石齋詩書畵集" (1998), 이화문화출판사
  59. 성호준, "『東醫寶鑑』의 儒學的 배경에 대한 이해", 東洋古典硏究, (15) (2001)
  60. 성호준, "조선 후기 石谷 李圭晙의 유학과 의학", 동양철학연구, (60), pp.109~132 (2009), 동양철학연구회
  61. 성호준, "조선 후기 儒醫 李圭晙의 心에 관한 硏究", 동양문화연구, 9, pp.51~77 (2012), 동양문화연구원
  62. 성호준, "儒醫 李圭晙의 <大學> 이해", 퇴계학논총, (20), pp.81~104 (2012), 사단법인 퇴계학부산연구원
  63. 申大植, "石齋徐丙五" (1977), 正文出版社
  64. 신동원, "1910년대 일제의 보건의료 정책 - 한의학 정책을 중심으로 -", 한국문화, (30), pp.333~370 (2002), 규장각한국학연구원
  65. 신동원, "조선후기 의원의 존재 양태", 한국과학사학회지, 26(2), pp.197~246 (2004), 한국과학사학회
  66. 신동원, "한국실학사상연구 4 과학기술편" (2005), 혜안
  67. 신동원, "유의儒醫의 길 : 정약용의 의학과 의술", 다산학, (10), pp.171~224 (2007), 재단법인다산학술문화재단
  68. 신상구, "石谷 李圭晙의 삶과 시세계", 포항문화유산해설사 양성과정자료집, ~ (2013)
  69. 예술의전당, "石齋徐丙五回顧展" (1989), 예술의 전당
  70. 오재근, "이규준 의서 『황제내경소문대요』의 유통본과 그 저본이 된 조선본 황제내경소문", 대한한의학원전학회지, 26(4), pp.203~221 (2013), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
  71. 오재근, "약 하나로 병 하나 고치기(用一藥治一病): 『동의보감』 단방의 편찬과 계승", 의사학, 22(1), pp.1~40 (2013), 대한의사학회
  72. 오재근, "조선 의서 『동의보감』은 왜 본초 부문을 「탕액편」이라고 하였을까 : 『동의보감』 「탕액편」 중 이고, 주진형의 본초학 성과 활용 분석", 의사학, 20(2), pp.263~290 (2011), 대한의사학회
  73. 오재근, "조선 의서 수재 약성가에 대한 연구", 박사, 원전학, pp.2010
  74. 오재근, "『東醫寶鑑』「湯液篇」의 本草 분류에 대한 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 23(5), pp.55~66 (2010), 대한한의학원전학회
  75. 오재근, "醫鑑重磨의 약성가에 대한 연구", 素問學會誌, (12) (2009)
  76. 오재근, "『本草經校正』(필사본)의 서지학적 고찰 및 내용 분석", 대한한의학원전학회지, 22(3), pp.321~337 (2009), 대한한의학원전학회
  77. 우인수, "조선후기 상주 존애원의 설립과 의료 기능", 대구사학, 104, pp.99~132 (2011), 대구사학회
  78. 이규근, "조선 후기 內醫院 醫官 연구", 朝鮮時代史學報, (3) (1997)
  79. 이기복, "18세기 의관 이수기(李壽祺)의 자기인식: 기술직 중인의 전문가의식을 중심으로", 의사학, 22(2), pp.483~528 (2013), 대한의사학회[DOI]
  80. 이나나, "문인화의 연원과 근대 영남문인화 형성에 관한 연구", 박사, 미술ㆍ디자인학, pp.2010
  81. 李元世, "寶林禪院哭笑子述", 寶林學報, (7) (1977)
  82. 李元世, "李元世任", 寶林學報, (8) (1978)
  83. 이인숙, "석재 서병오(1862~1936)와 ‘교남시서화연구회’의 재인식", 민족문화논총, (45), pp.345~379 (2010), 민족문화연구소
  84. 이인숙, "20세기 ‘대구문인화파(大邱文人畫派)’의 형성과 변천 연구", 영남학, (18), pp.463~497 (2010), 영남문화연구원
  85. 이남희, "조선후기 잡과의 위상과 특성 - 변화 속의 지속과 응집 -", 한국문화, (58), pp.65~86 (2012), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  86. 李能和, "朝鮮名人傳(二)" (1939), 朝鮮日報社
  87. 李成茂, "改正增補 韓國의 科擧制度" (1994), 집문당
  88. 李殷相, "韓國現代隨筆集資料叢書 5 鷺山文選" (1987)
  89. 李乙浩, "四象醫學論", 東洋醫藥, (2) (1935)
  90. 조남호, "{동의보감}의 이론적 구조와 그 성격*- 이론 내적인 특성과 이론 외적인 특성을 중심으로 -", 동방학지, (134), pp.339~361 (2006), 국학연구원
  91. 朱弘濟, "張氏類經演繹第一回", 東洋醫學, (1) (1947)
  92. 진명순, "거사불교운동의 내용과 의미", 동아시아불교문화, (4) (2009)
  93. 최호석(崔皓晳), "大邱 在田堂書鋪의 出版 活動 연구 - 在田堂書鋪의 出版人과 刊行 書籍을 중심으로 -", 어문연구(語文硏究), 34(4), pp.229~254 (2006), 한국어문교육연구회
  94. 포항시사편찬위원회, "浦項市史" (2010), 포항시사편찬위원회
  95. 許在惠, "18세기 醫官의 經濟的 活動樣相", 韓國史硏究, (71) (1990)
  96. 홍세영, "왕실의 議藥", 한국의사학회지, 23(1), pp.105~113 (2010), 한국의사학회
  97. 黃元德, "석곡 이규준의 扶陽論에 관한 硏究", 大韓原典醫史學會誌, (12) (1999)
  98. 裘沛然, "高等中医院校 敎学参考丛书 中医各家学说" (1992), 人民卫生出版社
  99. 谢观, "中国医学源流论" (2003), 福建科学技术出版社
  100. 严世芸, "新世纪全国高等中医药院校规划敎材 中医各家学说" (2003), 中国中医药出版社
  101. 李国淸, "内经疑难解读" (2000), 人民卫生出版社
  102. 任应秋, "全国高等医药院校试用敎材 中医各家学说" (1980), 上海科学技术出版社
  103. 任应秋, "高等医药院敎材 中医各家学说" (2007), 上海科学技术出版社
  104. 張笑平, "现代中医各家学说" (1991), 中国中医药出版社
  105. 陈大舜, "中南五省中医学院 中医基础系列敎材 中医各家学说" (1989), 湖北科学技术出版社
  106. 黄煌, "中医临床传统流派" (1991), 中国医药科学出版社
  107. 三木榮, "朝鮮醫學史及疾病史" (1962), 自家出版
  108. 真柳誠, "ソウル大學奎章閣の古醫籍書誌(二)", 茨城大学人文学部紀要 人文学科論集, (42) (2004)
  109. Chao, Yuanling, "The Ideal Physician in Late Imperial China", East Asian Science, Technology, and Medicine, 17 (2000)
  110. Furth, Charlotte, "Thinking With Cases" (2007), University of Hawaii Press
  111. Hanson, Marta E., "Speaking of Epidemics in Chinese Medicine" (2011), Routledge
  112. Scheid, Volker, "Currents of Tradition in Chinese Medicine" (2007), Eastland Press
  113. 신동원, "“Nationalistic” Acceptance of Sasang Medicine", The Review of Korean Studies, 9(2), pp.143~163 (2006), 한국학중앙연구원
  114. Wu, Yiyi, "A Medical Line of Many Masters: A Prosopographical Study of Liu Wansu and His Disciples from the Jin to the Early Ming", Chinese Science, (11) (1994)
  115. Zeitlin, Judith T., "Thinking With Cases" (2007), University of Hawaii Press

관련 논문AI추천

조선 의가 이규준의 『황제내경』 의학 계승 - 『의감중마』「계경장부편」을 중심으로 -오재근대한한의학원전학회 · 대한한의학원전학회지2015 · 제28권 제1호石谷 李圭晙의 『石谷散稿』 번역 연구(Ⅱ)권오민, 남성우, 박상영, 안상영, 안상우, 한창현대한한의학원전학회 · 대한한의학원전학회지2009 · 제22권 제4호『東醫壽世保元』에 나타난 李濟馬의 治療醫學精神송일병사상체질면역의학회 · 사상체질면역의학회지2001 · 제13권 제2호과거의 의서에서부터 당대의 실천까지 : 『소문대요』, 소문학회, 그리고 동아시아 의학전통의 전승을 바라보는 의료인류학적 시선김태우한국의사학회 · 한국의사학회지2013 · 제26권 제1호현대 한의학의 이해 - 한의학의 정체성 문제 고찰을 위한 예비 연구이충열한의병리학회 · 동의생리병리학회지2010 · 제24권 제5호石谷 李圭晙의 『石谷散稿』번역 연구(Ⅰ)권오민, 박상영, 안상영, 안상우, 한창현대한한의학원전학회 · 대한한의학원전학회지2009 · 제22권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)

17세기 후반 우역의 주기적 유행이 기근·전염병·호환에 미친 영향김동진, 유한상, 이항pp. 1-56한국의 세계보건기구(WHO) 가입과정과 1950년대의 사업성과이선호pp. 99-126
원문 보기