본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Ability of a modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score to predict mortality among sepsis patients in a resource-limited setting

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background Some variables of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score are not routinely measured in sepsis patients, especially in countries with limited resources. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the modified SOFA (mSOFA) and compared its ability to predict mortality in sepsis patients to that of the original SOFA score. Methods Sepsis patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of Songklanagarind Hospital between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 1,522 sepsis patients were enrolled. The mean SOFA and mSOFA scores were 9.7±4.3 and 8.8±3.9, respectively. The discrimination of the mSOFA score was significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for all-cause in-hospital mortality(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.891 [95% confidence interval, 0.875–0.907] vs. 0.879 [0.862–0.896]; P<0.001), all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (0.880 [0.863–0.898] vs. 0.871 [0.853–0.889], P=0.01) and all-cause 28-day mortality (0.887 [0.871–0.904] vs. 0.874 [0.856–0.892], P<0.001). The ability of mSOFA score to predict all-cause in-hospital and 28-day mortality was higher than that of the SOFA score within the subgroups of sepsis according to age, sepsis severity and serum lactate levels. The mSOFA score was demonstrated to have a performance similar to the original SOFA score regarding the prediction of mortality in sepsis patients with cirrhosis or hepatic dysfunction. Conclusions The mSOFA score was a good alternative to the original SOFA core in predicting mortality among sepsis patients admitted to the ICU.

Abstract

Background Some variables of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score are not routinely measured in sepsis patients, especially in countries with limited resources. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the modified SOFA (mSOFA) and compared its ability to predict mortality in sepsis patients to that of the original SOFA score. Methods Sepsis patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit of Songklanagarind Hospital between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Results A total of 1,522 sepsis patients were enrolled. The mean SOFA and mSOFA scores were 9.7±4.3 and 8.8±3.9, respectively. The discrimination of the mSOFA score was significantly higher than that of the SOFA score for all-cause in-hospital mortality(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.891 [95% confidence interval, 0.875–0.907] vs. 0.879 [0.862–0.896]; P<0.001), all-cause intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (0.880 [0.863–0.898] vs. 0.871 [0.853–0.889], P=0.01) and all-cause 28-day mortality (0.887 [0.871–0.904] vs. 0.874 [0.856–0.892], P<0.001). The ability of mSOFA score to predict all-cause in-hospital and 28-day mortality was higher than that of the SOFA score within the subgroups of sepsis according to age, sepsis severity and serum lactate levels. The mSOFA score was demonstrated to have a performance similar to the original SOFA score regarding the prediction of mortality in sepsis patients with cirrhosis or hepatic dysfunction. Conclusions The mSOFA score was a good alternative to the original SOFA core in predicting mortality among sepsis patients admitted to the ICU.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Rudd KE, "Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017 : analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study", Lancet, 395, pp.200~211 (2020)
  2. Reinhart K, "Recognizing sepsis as a global health priority : a WHO resolution", N Engl J Med, 377, pp.414~417 (2017)
  3. Singer M, "The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock(Sepsis-3)", JAMA, 315, pp.801~810 (2016)
  4. Vincent JL, "The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction", failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, 1996, pp.22, 707~710
  5. Ferreira FL, "Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients", JAMA, 286, pp.1754~1758 (2001)
  6. Khwannimit B, "A comparison of three organ dysfunction scores : MODS, SOFA and LOD for predicting ICU mortality in critically ill patients", J Med Assoc Thai, 90, pp.1074~1081 (2007)
  7. Khwannimit B, "Comparison of the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country", J Crit Care, 44, pp.156~160 (2018)
  8. Safari S, "Accuracy of SOFA score in prediction of 30-day outcome of critically ill patients", Turk J Emerg Med, 16, pp.146~150 (2016)
  9. Williams JM, "Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, quick sequential organ function assessment, and organ dysfunction : insights from a prospective database of ED patients with infection", Chest, 151, pp.586~596 (2017)
  10. Raymond NJ, "Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment sepsis score in an emergency department setting : retrospective assessment of prognostic value", Emerg Med Australas, 31, pp.339~346 (2019)
  11. Sendagire C, "Feasibility of the modified sequential organ function assessment score in a resource-constrained setting : a prospective observational study", BMC Anesthesiol, 17, pp.12~ (2017)
  12. Engel JM, "Outcome prediction in a surgical ICU using automatically calculated SAPS II scores", Anaesth Intensive Care, 31, pp.548~554 (2003)
  13. DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves : a nonparametric approach", Biometrics, 44, pp.837~845 (1988)
  14. Ray P, "Statistical evaluation of a biomarker", Anesthesiology, 112, pp.1023~1040 (2010)
  15. Raith EP, "Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit", JAMA, 317, pp.290~300 (2017)
  16. Zhang Y, "Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit", J Card Surg, 35, pp.118~127 (2020)
  17. Probst L, "Prognostic accuracy of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS criteria in hematological cancer patients : a retrospective multicenter study", J Intensive Care, 7, pp.41~ (2019)
  18. Basile-Filho A, "The use of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS 3, C-reactive protein", albumin ratio, and lactate to predict mortality of surgical critically ill patients: a retrospective cohort study, 2019, pp.98, e16204~
  19. Breslow MJ, "Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1. Interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems", Chest, 141, pp.245~252 (2012)
  20. Flaatten H, "Activity-or severity-based scoring in the ICU?", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 61, pp.2~4 (2017)
  21. Baker T, "The clinical usefulness of prognostic prediction models in critical illness", Eur J Intern Med, 45, pp.37~40 (2017)
  22. Yadav H, "Improving the accuracy of cardiovascular component of the sequential organ failure assessment score", Crit Care Med, 43, pp.1449~1457 (2015)
  23. Vasilevskis EE, "Validity of a modified sequential organ failure assessment score using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale", Crit Care Med, 44, pp.138~146 (2016)
  24. Kotani Y, "Modification of sequential organ failure assessment score using acute kidney injury classification", J Crit Care, 51, pp.198~203 (2019)
  25. Grissom CK, "A modified sequential organ failure assessment score for critical care triage", Disaster Med Public Health Prep, 4, pp.277~284 (2010)
  26. Rahmatinejad Z, "Predictive performance of the SOFA and mSOFA scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department", Am J Emerg Med, 37, pp.1237~1241 (2019)
  27. Dellinger RP, "Surviving Sepsis Campaign : international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012", Intensive Care Med, 39, pp.165~228 (2013)
  28. Levesque E, "Prospective evaluation of the prognostic scores for cirrhotic patients admitted to an intensive care unit", J Hepatol, 56, pp.95~102 (2012)
  29. Zhao H, "Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems in liver cirrhosis patients with bloodstream infection", Medicine(Baltimore), 96, pp.e8844~ (2017)
  30. Woznica EA, "Liver dysfunction in sepsis", Adv Clin Exp Med, 27, pp.547~551 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical Application of the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score at Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Bacteremia: A Single-Center Experience of Korea김원영, 김인수, 나해정, 이광하, 정은숙대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2017 · 제32권 제3호The quick sepsis-related organ failure score has limited value for predicting adverse outcomes in sepsis patients with liver cirrhosisChae-Man Lim, Jeongsuk Son, Jin Won Huh, Ju Hyun Shim, Kang Mo Kim, Sang-Bum Hong, Sunhui Choi, Young-Suk Lim, Younsuck Koh대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2020 · 제35권 제4호Application of Sepsis-3 Criteria to Korean Patients with Critical Illnesses고윤석, 권재영, 김재열, 김태엽, 김환일, 나성원, 류호걸, 문재영, 박지숙, 서지영, 윤상원, 이상학대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2019 · 제34권 제1호Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score as a predictor of mortality in ventilated patients with multidrug-resistant bacteremia노지연, 오예슬, 이광하, 이민기, 이재민, 정현성대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2020 · 제35권 제3호Serum lactate levels in cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis patients with septic shockChairat Permpikul, Kamonlawat Sutthipool, Surat Tongyoo, Tanuwong Viarasilpa대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2022 · 제37권 제1호Reappraisal of sepsis-3 and CLIF-SOFA as predictors of mortality in patients with cirrhosis and infection presenting to the emergency department: A multicenter study김동준, 김태석, 석기태, 이민종, 최대희, 허정원, Baek Gyu Jun, Da Hye Moon, Gab Jin Cheon, Hye Ah Lee, Ji Hyun Kim, Moon Young Kim, Seong Hee Kang, Soon Koo Baik, Young Don Kim대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2022 · 제28권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (26건)