청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화
Social Perceptions of Quack in Qing Dynasty and Its Transformation in the Late Qing Period
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
"Yong-yi" means "quack" in English, which generally refers to a doctor who does not have good medical skills. In the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, various criticism about "Yong-yi" became popularized, and by the late Qing period, "quacks" had become a serious social issue. The theory of traditional Chinese medicine was developed during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and local medical resources also increased. Moreover, the prevalence of medical book publishing led to the openness and generalization of medical knowledge. As a result, not only the number of doctors increased, but also the number of doctors who lack medical knowledge and clinical experience increased. However, at the outset, "Yong-yi" did not only mean doctors with poor medical skills. "Yong-yi" also reflected conflicts and contradictions between doctors. Doctors consistently criticized quacks in an attempt to maintain their identity as a "good" doctor or a Confucian doctor. In this sense, "Yong-yi" was used among physicians as an expression of discrimination and exclusion. The concept of "quackery" was also determined by the relationship between patients and doctors. In general, itinerant doctors, midwives and shaman doctors were regarded as "Yong-yi"; however, they served the medical needs of various patients. Thus, to some extent, "Yong-yi" were also useful medical resources. On the contrary, in certain situations, "shiyi," physicians who serviced a family for generations and were generally believed to be reliable and as trustworthy doctors, were also labelled as quacks, especially when the patient did not trust them or was not satisfied with the treatment. Therefore, doctors’ thoughts about "Yong-yi" did not always coincide with patients’ thoughts about "Yong-yi." However, by the late Qing period, the description of quacks in media reports found a singular connotation, and the divergent social image of quacks disappeared. By this time, quacks were uniformly described as ignorant and irresponsible Chinese medicine practitioners. Specifically, in one murder case in which a "Yong-yi" was accused as the murderer, the report unilaterally reported the patient’s claims. Consequently, Chinese medicine practitioners who failed in their treatment of patients became labeled as "quack" doctors. In newspaper reports, "Yong-yi" no longer simply referred to individual cases of "quacks" but had come to represent the entirety of the Chinese medicine practitioner community. On the contrary, Western medical doctors who replaced the status of traditional doctors were positively portrayed. Pictorials also had similar perspectives with newspapers, supporting the narrative of the news with ironic drawings and articles. Overall, media reports regarding "Yong-yi" did not focus on reporting facts, but they had the purpose of making quacks a serious social problem.
Abstract
"Yong-yi" means "quack" in English, which generally refers to a doctor who does not have good medical skills. In the Ming and Qing dynasties in China, various criticism about "Yong-yi" became popularized, and by the late Qing period, "quacks" had become a serious social issue. The theory of traditional Chinese medicine was developed during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and local medical resources also increased. Moreover, the prevalence of medical book publishing led to the openness and generalization of medical knowledge. As a result, not only the number of doctors increased, but also the number of doctors who lack medical knowledge and clinical experience increased. However, at the outset, "Yong-yi" did not only mean doctors with poor medical skills. "Yong-yi" also reflected conflicts and contradictions between doctors. Doctors consistently criticized quacks in an attempt to maintain their identity as a "good" doctor or a Confucian doctor. In this sense, "Yong-yi" was used among physicians as an expression of discrimination and exclusion. The concept of "quackery" was also determined by the relationship between patients and doctors. In general, itinerant doctors, midwives and shaman doctors were regarded as "Yong-yi"; however, they served the medical needs of various patients. Thus, to some extent, "Yong-yi" were also useful medical resources. On the contrary, in certain situations, "shiyi," physicians who serviced a family for generations and were generally believed to be reliable and as trustworthy doctors, were also labelled as quacks, especially when the patient did not trust them or was not satisfied with the treatment. Therefore, doctors’ thoughts about "Yong-yi" did not always coincide with patients’ thoughts about "Yong-yi." However, by the late Qing period, the description of quacks in media reports found a singular connotation, and the divergent social image of quacks disappeared. By this time, quacks were uniformly described as ignorant and irresponsible Chinese medicine practitioners. Specifically, in one murder case in which a "Yong-yi" was accused as the murderer, the report unilaterally reported the patient’s claims. Consequently, Chinese medicine practitioners who failed in their treatment of patients became labeled as "quack" doctors. In newspaper reports, "Yong-yi" no longer simply referred to individual cases of "quacks" but had come to represent the entirety of the Chinese medicine practitioner community. On the contrary, Western medical doctors who replaced the status of traditional doctors were positively portrayed. Pictorials also had similar perspectives with newspapers, supporting the narrative of the news with ironic drawings and articles. Overall, media reports regarding "Yong-yi" did not focus on reporting facts, but they had the purpose of making quacks a serious social problem.
참고문헌 (39)
- 顧炎武, "日知錄校注" (2007), 安徽大學出版社
- 徐大椿, "醫學源流輪" (2008), 中國中醫藥出版社
- 徐春甫, "古今醫統大全 下" (1995), 安徽科學技術出版社
- 盛康, "皇朝經世文續編, 武進盛氏思補樓刊版", ~
- 沈家本, "大清現行新律例", 清宣統元年法律館鉛印, ~
- 張景岳, "景岳全書, 明清中醫名著叢刊" (1994), 中國中醫藥出版社
- 曹去晶, "姑妄言" (2000), 金城出版社
- 曹炳章, "清代名醫醫話精華" (2007), 農村讀物出版社
- 趙學敏, "串雅全書" (1998), 中國中醫藥出版社
- 朱軾, "大清律集解附例", 清雍正三年內府刻本, ~
- 陳夢雷, "『古今圖書集成』 經濟彙編", 清雍正銅活字本, ~
- 官箴書集成編纂委員會, "官箴書集成 第5冊" (1997), 黃山書社
- 國家圖書館分館, "清末民初報刊圖畫集成(影印本)" (2003), 全國圖書館文獻縮微複制中心
- 馬濤, "呂坤評傳" (2000), 南京大學出版社
- 김대기, "중국 원대 의료관원의 선발과 관리-의호(醫戶)제도와 의학과거제의 실시를 중심으로-", 의사학, 26(3), pp.455~502 (2017), 대한의사학회
- 유연실, "청대(淸代) 산과(産科) 의서와 여성의 출산: 『달생편(達生編)』을 중심으로", 의사학, 24(1), pp.111~162 (2015), 대한의사학회[DOI]
- 황영원, "명청시대 의사와 지역사회- 강남지역 유의를 중심으로", 연세의사학, 20(1) (2017)
- 雷祥麟, "生命與醫療" (2005), 中國大百科全書出版社
- 塗豐恩, "從徽州醫案看明清的醫病關系(1500-1800)", 碩士, pp.2008
- 鄧鐵濤, "中國防疫史" (2006), 廣西科學技術出版社
- 路彩霞, "清末京津庸醫問題初探", 中國社會曆史評論, 8 (2007)
- 路彩霞, "清末京津公共衛生機制演進研究(1900-1911)" (2010), 湖北人民出版社
- 劉曉林, "金瓶梅: 醫人形象說諷刺", 衡陽師專學報(社會科學), 20(1) (1999)
- 馬金生, "明清時期醫德問題的社會史考察—以16至18世紀爲中心", 史林, (3) (2008)
- 馬金生, "發現醫病糾紛―民國醫訟凸顯的社會文化史研究" (2016), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 余新忠, "清代江南的瘟疫與社會―一項醫療社會史的研究" (2003), 中國人民大學出版社
- 梁其姿, "面對疾病―傳統中國社會的醫療觀念與組織" (2011), 中國人民大學出版社
- 楊曉越, "醫生也 “瘋狂”: 明清笑話中的庸醫形象探析", 安徽史學, (1期) (2017)
- 王立, "明清小說中的醫者形象研究綜述", 大連大學學報, 34(4) (2013)
- 王靜, "清代走方醫的生存狀態及形象演變", 碩士, pp.2012
- 王靜, "清代走方醫的醫術傳承及醫療特點", 雲南社會科學, (3) (2013)
- 王靜, "從走方醫看前近代中國官民互動與民間醫療世界―以雍正, 嘉慶朝两起案件为中心", 清史研究, (1) (2019)
- 龍偉, "民國醫事糾紛研究(1927-1949)" (2011), 人民出版社
- 陳平原, "圖像晚清―點石齋畫報" (2001), 百花文藝出版社
- 陳平原, "點石齋畫報選" (2014), 貴州教育出版社
- 祝平一, "醫藥不死病, 佛度有緣人―明清的醫療市場, 醫學知識與醫病關系", 近代史研究所集刊, (68) (2010)
- 許三春, "清以來的鄉村醫療制度―從草澤鈴醫到赤腳醫生", 博士, pp.2012
- Che-chia, Chang, "The Therapeutic Tug of War-The Imperial Physician-patient Relationship in the Era of Empress Dowager Cixi (1874-1908)", Ph.D, pp.1908
- Cullen, Chirstopher, "Patient and Healers In Late Imperial China: Evidence From Jinpingmei", History of Science, 31(2), pp.99~150 (1993)
