Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators.Methods: The study included 32 patients who were scheduled for planned open abdominal surgery. Depending on the chosen ventilation strategy, patients were included in two groups of PCV mode ventilation (n=14) and ASV mode ventilation (n=18). The hemodynamic effects of the ventilation strategies were assessed by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) and cardiac index (esCCI). Results: Preoperative cardiac output (CO) was 6.1±1.3 L/min in group 1 patients and 6.3±0.8 L/min in group 2 patients, and preoperative cardiac index (CI) was 3.9±0.4 mL/m2 in group 1 patients and 3.8±0.8 mL/m2 in group 2 patients. The ejection fraction (EF) in group 1 subjects was 55.4%±0.3%; this rate was 56.5%±0.5% in group 2 subjects. Group 1 patients experienced a 14.7% CO decrease to 5.2±0.7 L/min, a 17.9% CI decrease to 3.2±0.6 mL/m2, and a 12.8% mean arterial pressure decrease to 82.3±9.4 mm Hg 30 minutes after the start of surgery. One hour after the start of surgery, the CO mean values of group 2 patients were lower than baseline by 7.9% and differed from the dynamics of patients in group 1, in whom CO was lower than baseline by 13.1%. At the end of the operation, the CO values were lower than baseline by 11.5% and 6.3% in patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Our data showed that the changes in EF during and after surgery correlated with CO indicators determined by the esCCO.Conclusions: In our study, perioperative ventilation in ASV mode was more protective than PCV mode and was characterized by lower tidal volume (16.2%) and driving pressure (ΔP) (12.1%). Hemodynamically-controlled mechanical ventilation reduces the negative impact of cardiopulmonary interactions.
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators.Methods: The study included 32 patients who were scheduled for planned open abdominal surgery. Depending on the chosen ventilation strategy, patients were included in two groups of PCV mode ventilation (n=14) and ASV mode ventilation (n=18). The hemodynamic effects of the ventilation strategies were assessed by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) and cardiac index (esCCI). Results: Preoperative cardiac output (CO) was 6.1±1.3 L/min in group 1 patients and 6.3±0.8 L/min in group 2 patients, and preoperative cardiac index (CI) was 3.9±0.4 mL/m2 in group 1 patients and 3.8±0.8 mL/m2 in group 2 patients. The ejection fraction (EF) in group 1 subjects was 55.4%±0.3%; this rate was 56.5%±0.5% in group 2 subjects. Group 1 patients experienced a 14.7% CO decrease to 5.2±0.7 L/min, a 17.9% CI decrease to 3.2±0.6 mL/m2, and a 12.8% mean arterial pressure decrease to 82.3±9.4 mm Hg 30 minutes after the start of surgery. One hour after the start of surgery, the CO mean values of group 2 patients were lower than baseline by 7.9% and differed from the dynamics of patients in group 1, in whom CO was lower than baseline by 13.1%. At the end of the operation, the CO values were lower than baseline by 11.5% and 6.3% in patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Our data showed that the changes in EF during and after surgery correlated with CO indicators determined by the esCCO.Conclusions: In our study, perioperative ventilation in ASV mode was more protective than PCV mode and was characterized by lower tidal volume (16.2%) and driving pressure (ΔP) (12.1%). Hemodynamically-controlled mechanical ventilation reduces the negative impact of cardiopulmonary interactions.
참고문헌 (20)
- Güldner A, "Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications : a comprehensive review of the role of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruitment maneuvers", Anesthesiology, 123, pp.692~713 (2015)
- Lloyd TC Jr, "Mechanical cardiopulmonary interdependence", J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol, 52, pp.333~339 (1982)
- Pinsky MR, "Hemodynamic effects of cardiac cycle-specific increases in intrathoracic pressure", J Appl Physiol(1985), 60, pp.604~612 (1986)
- Abraham E, "Cardiorespiratory effects of pressure controlled ventilation in severe respiratory failure", Chest, 98, pp.1445~1449 (1990)
- Poelaert JI, "Acute hemodynamic changes of pressure-controlled inverse ratio ventilation in the adult respiratory distress syndrome : a transesophageal echocardiographic and Doppler study", Chest, 104, pp.214~219 (1993)
- Singer M, "Hemodynamic effects of manual hyperinflation in critically ill mechanically ventilated patients", Chest, 106, pp.1182~1187 (1994)
- Ishihara H, "The ability of a new continuous cardiac output monitor to measure trends in cardiac output following implementation of a patient information calibration and an automated exclusion algorithm", J Clin Monit Comput, 26, pp.465~471 (2012)
- Futier E, "A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery", N Engl J Med, 369, pp.428~437 (2013)
- PROVE Network Investigators for the Clinical Trial Network of the European Society of Anaesthesiology, "High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure during general anaesthesia for open abdominal surgery(PROVHILO trial) : a multicentre randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 384, pp.495~503 (2014)
- Ladha K, "Intraoperative protective mechanical ventilation and risk of postoperative respiratory complications : hospital based registry study", BMJ, 351, pp.h3646~ (2015)
- Severgnini P, "Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function", Anesthesiology, 118, pp.1307~1321 (2013)
- Orbegozo Cortés D, "Normobaric hyperoxia alters the microcirculation in healthy volunteers", Microvasc Res, 98, pp.23~28 (2015)
- Smit B, "Moderate hyperoxic versus near-physiological oxygen targets during and after coronary artery bypass surgery : a randomised controlled trial", Crit Care, 20, pp.55~ (2016)
- Llitjos JF, "Hyperoxia toxicity after cardiac arrest : what is the evidence?", Ann Intensive Care, 6, pp.23~ (2016)
- Belliato M, "Evaluation of adaptive support ventilation in paralysed patients and in a physical lung model", Int J Artif Organs, 27, pp.709~716 (2004)
- Arnal JM, "Automatic selection of breathing pattern using adaptive support ventilation", Intensive Care Med, 34, pp.75~81 (2008)
- Dmytro D, "Successful experience of using adaptive support ventilation(ASV)in the patient with suspected COVID pneumonia", Anaesth Pain Intensiv Care, 25, pp.111~117 (2021)
- Nazarchuk OA, "Clinical, microbiological research of the effectiveness of inhalation use of quaternary ammonium antiseptic in the prevention and treatment of infectious respiratory complications in critically ill patients", Biomed Res Ther, 12, pp.2850~2862 (2018)
- Rose L, "Automated versus non-automated weaning for reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation for critically ill adults and children : a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis", Crit Care, 19, pp.48~ (2015)
- Kirakli C, "A randomized controlled trial comparing the ventilation duration between adaptive support ventilation and pressure assist", control ventilation in medical patients in the ICU, 2015, pp.147, 1503~1509