본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

급성 폐 손상 및 급성 호흡곤란증후군 환자에서 Conventional Volume-Controlled Ventilation과 Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) 적용에 대한 비교

A Comparison of Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) and Conventional Volume-Controlled Ventilation on Respiratory Mechanics in Acute Lung Injury/ARDS

3

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background: ASV is a closed-loop ventilation system that guarantees a user-set minimum per-minute volume in intubated patients, whether paralyzed or with spontaneous breathing. Here, we tested the effects of ASV onrespiratory mechanics and compared them with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). Methods: Thirteen patients meeting the criteria for acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were enrolled. All patients were paralyzed to eliminate spontaneous breathing. We started with VCV (VCV1), then used ASV followed by VCV modes (VCV2), maintaining minute volume as much as that of VCV1. Results: During ASV, compared with VCV1, the inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes and expiratory resistance increased. Conversely, the total respiratory rate and maximum pressure decreased. No changes in the arterial blood gases, heart rate, or mean systemic pressure were noted during the trial. Conclusions: In ALI/ARDS patients, although no differences were observed in the arterial blood gas analysis between the two modes, ASV provided better respiratory mechanics in terms of peak airway pressure and tidal volume than VCV.

Abstract

Background: ASV is a closed-loop ventilation system that guarantees a user-set minimum per-minute volume in intubated patients, whether paralyzed or with spontaneous breathing. Here, we tested the effects of ASV onrespiratory mechanics and compared them with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV). Methods: Thirteen patients meeting the criteria for acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were enrolled. All patients were paralyzed to eliminate spontaneous breathing. We started with VCV (VCV1), then used ASV followed by VCV modes (VCV2), maintaining minute volume as much as that of VCV1. Results: During ASV, compared with VCV1, the inspiratory and expiratory tidal volumes and expiratory resistance increased. Conversely, the total respiratory rate and maximum pressure decreased. No changes in the arterial blood gases, heart rate, or mean systemic pressure were noted during the trial. Conclusions: In ALI/ARDS patients, although no differences were observed in the arterial blood gas analysis between the two modes, ASV provided better respiratory mechanics in terms of peak airway pressure and tidal volume than VCV.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Otis AB, "Mechanics of breathing in man", J Appl Physiol, 2, pp.592~607 (1950)
  2. Kim CH, "Servo controlled modes of ventilation", Korean J Crit Care Med, 17, pp.1~4 (2002)
  3. Tassaux T, "Patient-ventilator interactions during partial ventilatory support: a preliminary study comparing the effects of adaptive support ventilation with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation plus inspiratory pressure support", Crit Care Med, 30, pp.801~807 (2002)
  4. Campbell R, "Adaptive support ventilation", Respir Care Clin N Am, 7, pp.425~440 (2001)
  5. Hewlett A, "Mandatory minute volume: a new concept in weaning from mechanical ventilation", Anaesthesia, 32, pp.163~169 (1997)
  6. Cassina T, "Clinical experience with adaptive support ventilation for fast-track cardiac surgery", J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 17, pp.571~575 (2003)
  7. Linton DM, "Adaptive support ventilation as the sole mode of ventilatory support in chronically ventilated patients", Crit Care Resusc, 8, pp.11~14 (2006)
  8. Gruber PC, "Randomized controlled trial comparing adaptivesupport ventilation with pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation with automode in weaning patients after cardiac surgery", Anesthesiology, 109, pp.81~87 (2008)
  9. Arnal JM, "Automatic selection of breathing pattern using adaptive support ventilation", Intensive Care Med, 34, pp.75~81 (2008)
  10. Bernard GR, "Report of the American-European consensus conference on acute respiratory distress syndrome: definitions, mechanism, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 149, pp.818~824 (1994)
  11. Brunner JX, "Adaptive support ventilation (ASV)", Minerva Anestesiol, 68, pp.365~368 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

Association between mechanical power and intensive care unit mortality in Korean patients under pressure-controlled ventilation강형구, 김경찬, 김영삼, 김윤성, 리원연, 박성훈, 박소영, 박주희, 서지영, 송원준, 심재겸, 이광하, 이상민, 이연주, 이진화, 이흥범, 임채만, 최원일, 홍지영, Sim Yun Su대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2024 · 제39권 제1호급성호흡곤란증후군의 최신 진료 지침김원영, 김태완대한내과학회 · 대한내과학회지2023 · 제98권 제5호Clinical Practice Guideline of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome정훈, 강은경, 곽상현, 김제형, 김호철, 리원연, 문재영, 박소영, 신인순, 심윤수, 이석정, 이진국, 이현정, 임재민, 정경수, 조영재, 최원일대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2016 · 제31권 제2호Change in management and outcome of mechanical ventilation in Korea: a prospective observational study강형구, 김영삼, 김윤성, 리원연, 박성훈, 박주희, 서지영, 심윤수, 이광하, 이연주, 이진화, 임채만, 홍지영, Heung Bum Lee, Jae Kyeom Sim, Kyung Chan Kim, Sang-Min Lee, So Young Park, Won-Il Choi, Won Jun Song대한내과학회 · The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine2022 · 제37권 제3호Liberation from mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines박성훈, 박소영, 서지영, 심윤수, 오동규, 이학재, 장유진, 정인석, 하태순, 홍석경대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2024 · 제39권 제1호Characteristics and management of mechanically ventilated patients in South Korea compared with other high-income Asian countries and regions강성욱, 고윤석, 곽상현, 김덕규, 김성현, 김진형, 남경훈, 박성훈, 박소정, 박소희, 박지수, 박진경, 박태선, 변기섭, 신윤미, 심윤수, 안지환, 이광하, 이보영, 이상민, 이송이, 임아영, 장항제, 전경만, 전상범, 정원재, 정윤정, 조영재, 조우현, 홍석경대한중환자의학회 · Acute and Critical Care2025 · 제40권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)