본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Medical Treatment of Criminals in Premodern China Based on Qing Era Local Archives: Focusing on the Case of Ba County in the late 18th Century

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

This study aimed to confirm what kind of medical treatment was given to criminals by the local governments in Qing China and the role of the government doctors in charge of the criminals’ medical care. Using local administrative and historical materials, I explore the procedures and methods of medical treatment and explain the treatment processes for criminals. The findings demonstrate that, although different from modern ideals, in premodern China under the emperor’s rule, there were provisions for ailing criminals to receive medical treatment. In the Qing era, the execution of actual punishments worked as a keynote of judicial policy, and the number of criminals managed by local government offices was larger than before. The government doctors took charge of the criminals’ medical treatment, but it seems that their position in the Qing era was not popular due to low salaries and psychological resistance to treating guilty criminals. Moreover, the government doctors dispatched to treat criminals were required to play an additional role. They had to testify that there were no other causes of death other than disease, which demonstrates that the government doctor played a role in determining whether the death was a crime. However, their treatment practices for criminals demonstrate the use of traditional medicine from the Tang and Song era onwards. There are two reasons for this. First, unlike the private market, there was no economic incentives for doctors to use new medicines and prescriptions. Second, because of the fear of being reprimanded for the death of the criminal, using classical prescriptions was a way for doctors to defend the adequacy of their medical practice. From an institutional perspective, medical care for criminals through government doctors was guaranteed during the Qing era. However, government doctors were not selected for their medical competence, nor were they provided with adequate incentives to practice good medical care. Even some government doctors devoted themselves to medical care, the quality of care was not systematically guaranteed. This provides evidence of the poor medical environment surrounding criminals in premodern China.

Abstract

This study aimed to confirm what kind of medical treatment was given to criminals by the local governments in Qing China and the role of the government doctors in charge of the criminals’ medical care. Using local administrative and historical materials, I explore the procedures and methods of medical treatment and explain the treatment processes for criminals. The findings demonstrate that, although different from modern ideals, in premodern China under the emperor’s rule, there were provisions for ailing criminals to receive medical treatment. In the Qing era, the execution of actual punishments worked as a keynote of judicial policy, and the number of criminals managed by local government offices was larger than before. The government doctors took charge of the criminals’ medical treatment, but it seems that their position in the Qing era was not popular due to low salaries and psychological resistance to treating guilty criminals. Moreover, the government doctors dispatched to treat criminals were required to play an additional role. They had to testify that there were no other causes of death other than disease, which demonstrates that the government doctor played a role in determining whether the death was a crime. However, their treatment practices for criminals demonstrate the use of traditional medicine from the Tang and Song era onwards. There are two reasons for this. First, unlike the private market, there was no economic incentives for doctors to use new medicines and prescriptions. Second, because of the fear of being reprimanded for the death of the criminal, using classical prescriptions was a way for doctors to defend the adequacy of their medical practice. From an institutional perspective, medical care for criminals through government doctors was guaranteed during the Qing era. However, government doctors were not selected for their medical competence, nor were they provided with adequate incentives to practice good medical care. Even some government doctors devoted themselves to medical care, the quality of care was not systematically guaranteed. This provides evidence of the poor medical environment surrounding criminals in premodern China.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Chen Shiduo (陳士鐸), "Bianzheng lu (辨證錄)", Collection of Peking University, ~
  2. Chen Shiduo (陳士鐸), "Dongtian aochi (洞天奧旨)", Collection of Peking University, ~
  3. Xue Yunsheng (薛允升), "Duli cunyi congkanben(讀例存疑重刊本)" (1980), Chinese materials and research aids service center(中文硏究資料中心)
  4. Huang Liuhong (黃六鴻), "Fuhui quanshu (福惠全書), in Guanzhenshu jicheng (官箴書 集成) Vol.3" (1997), Huangshan Shushe(黃山書社)
  5. Wu Youxing(吳有性), "Wenyi lun(溫疫論)" (2018), Zhongguo Yiyao Keji Chubanshe(中國醫 藥科技出版社)
  6. Zhu Qingqi (祝慶琪), "Xing’an huilan quanbian(刑案匯覽全編)" (2007), Falü Chubanshe(法律出版社)
  7. "Da Qing huidian zeli (大淸會典則例)", Collection of Kyoto University, ~
  8. Tian Tao (田濤), "Da Qing lüli (大淸律例)" (1998), Falü Chubanshe(法律出版社)
  9. Zhang Rongzheng (張榮錚), "Da Qing lüli (大淸律例)" (1993), Tianjin Guji Chubanshe(天津古籍出版社)
  10. "Dongchuan fu xuzhi (東川府續志)", Collection of Kyoto University, ~
  11. Fujian sheng li (福建省例), "Tawian wenxian congkan (臺灣文獻叢刊) Vol.1-4" (1997), Taiwan sheng wenxian weiyuanhui(臺灣省文獻委員會)
  12. Guangzhou fu zhi (廣州府志) (Guangxu), "Huanan difang (華南地方) Vol.1" (1966), Chengwen Chubanshe(成文出版社)
  13. Maxiang ting zhi (馬巷廳志), "Huanan difang (華南地方) Vol.98" (1967), Chengwen Chubanshe (成文出版社)
  14. Sichuan tongchi zhangcheng (四川通飭章程), "Bing bian (丙編), Vol.15" (2006), Shijie Tushu Chuban Gongsi(世界圖書出版公司)
  15. Taerbahatai shiyi (塔爾巴哈台事宜), "Xibu difang (西部地方), Vol.15" (1969), Chengwen Chubanshe(成文出版社)
  16. Tanglü shuyi (唐律疏議), "Tanglü shuyi xinzhu(唐律疏議新注)" (2007), Nanjing Shifan Daxue Chubanshe(南京師範大學出版社)
  17. Zhi Zhe cheng’gui (治浙成規), "Bing bian (丙編), Vol.8" (2006), Shijie Tushu Chuban Gongsi(世界圖書出版公司)
  18. "BXDA, Ba County Archives (巴縣檔案)", Collection of Sichuan Provincial Archives ( 四川省檔案館), ~
  19. "DXDA, Dan Xin Archives (淡新檔案)", DanXin Archives System for Hakka Studies ( 淡新檔案客家硏究數位分析系統), ~
  20. Akagi, Mieko(赤城美惠子), "A study of construction on Qiushen decision in the Qing dynasty : Restructuring the system of evaluation of crimes(淸代における秋審判 斷の構造 : 犯罪評價體系の再構成)", Legal History Review (法制史硏究), 63 (2014)
  21. Chen, Fei (陳飛), "A review of studies on the theories and clinical applications of medicinal ushers (藥引理論與臨床應用 硏究述評)", Jilin Journal of Chinese Medicine (吉林中醫藥), 42 (2022)
  22. 조병식, "天津 罪犯習藝所의 건설과 ‘근대’ 감옥의 탄생", 대구사학, 144, pp.331~370 (2021), 대구사학회
  23. 최지희, "청대 사회의 용의(庸醫) 문제 인식과 청말의 변화", 의사학, 28(1), pp.191~238 (2019), 대한의사학회
  24. 최지희, "청대 의약시장의 변화와 ‘가짜 약’ 논란", 의사학, 30(2), pp.277~315 (2021), 대한의사학회
  25. 최해별, "중국 의학지식 전승의 또 하나의 전통: 송대(宋代) ‘지괴의안(志怪醫案)’의 특징과 의미", 의사학, 31(1), pp.35~92 (2022), 대한의사학회[DOI]
  26. 홍성화, "국가와 사회단체의 사이에서— 청대 『파현당안』에 관한 해외 연구 동향 —", 사림, (72), pp.347~391 (2020), 수선사학회
  27. 황영원, "명청시대 의사와 지역사회 - 강남지역 유의(儒醫)를 중심으로", 연세의사학, 20(1), pp.97~117 (2017), 의학사연구소
  28. 김대기, "元代 恤刑과 罪囚에 대한 醫療 救恤", 인문과학연구, (47), pp.435~456 (2015), 인문과학연구소
  29. 김한밝, "18세기 淸朝의 軍流犯 관리와 新疆으로의 發遣", 명청사연구, (45), pp.245~284 (2016), 명청사학회[DOI]
  30. 김한밝, "淸代 配所 유배범의 석방과 自新의 援用", 동양사학연구, (150), pp.339~375 (2020), 동양사학회[DOI]
  31. Kim, Hanbark(キム・ハンバク), "An Age of Exile : The Qing Dynasty and Punishment(配流刑の時代 : 淸朝と刑罰)" (2022), Kyoto University Press(京都大學學術出版會)
  32. 국수호, "청대 의과시험의 실제 사례에 대한 고찰", 한국의사학회지, 34(2), pp.79~87 (2021), 한국의사학회
  33. 이세영, "교정의료전달체계와 수용자 인권", 한국의료법학회지, 17(1), pp.121~150 (2009), 한국의료법학회
  34. Li, Fengming(李鳳鳴), "Legal Responsibilities of Local Officials in the Qing era(淸代州 縣官吏的司法責任)" (2007), Fudan Daxue Chubanshe(復旦大學出版社)
  35. Ling, Peng (凌鵬), "Social characteristics of ‘militia’ in Ba County in the middle and late Qing dynasty: Taking cases from Ba County Archives as historical materials (淸代中后期巴縣地區“團”之社會性特征: 以《巴縣檔案》相關案件爲史料)", Seeker (求索), 6 (2020)
  36. Liu, Guihai(劉桂海), "The operation of county medicine and local medical in the Qing dynasty : center on the Nanbu county(淸代縣醫學的運作與地方醫療 : 以南部縣 爲中心)", Historical Research in Anhui (安徽史學), 3 (2020)
  37. Long, Wei (龍偉), "The mediation, trial and characteristics of the medical disputes in the Qing dynasty (淸代醫療糾紛的調解、審理及其特征)", Journal of China West Normal University: Philosophy & Social Sciences (西華師范大學學報: 哲學社會 科學版), 6 (2016)
  38. McKnight, Brian, "The Quality of Mercy : Amnesties and Traditional Chinese Justice" (1981), University of Hawaii Press
  39. Ōta, Izuru (太田出), "Crime and Punishment in Kinsei China: A Social History of Crime Trends, Police, and Prisons (中國近世の罪と罰: 犯罪・警察・監獄の社會史)" (2015), The University of Nagoya Press(名古屋大學出版會)
  40. Shiga, Shūzō(滋賀秀三), "Collected works on Chinese Legal History(中國法制史論集)" (2003), Sōbunsha(創文社)
  41. Suzuki, Hidemitsu(鈴木秀光), "A confinement chained to an iron bar and a confinement chained to a block of stone, and criminal procedures in late Qing China(鎖帶鐵桿・鎖帶石礅と淸代後期刑事裁判)", The Journal of Law and Political Science (法學), 75(5) (2012)
  42. Wang, Chaoqun (王超群), "Study on the thought and practice of Xuqiu from the prison of Board of Punishments in the Qing dynasty (從刑部監獄看淸代恤囚思 想與獄制實踐)", Historical Archives (歷史檔案) (2021)
  43. Wang, Sanhang (王三沆), "A brief history of doctor Wu Qian and Yizong jinjian in Qing era (淸代醫家吳謙與《醫宗金鑒》述略)", Forum on Traditional Chinese Medicine (國醫論壇), 29(3) (2014)
  44. Yu, Shenchu(俞慎初), "A Brief History of Chinese Medical History(中國醫學簡史)" (1983), Fujian Kexue Jishu Chubanshe(福建科學技術出版社)
  45. Zelin, Madeleine, "The Magistrate’s Tael : Rationalizing Fiscal Reform in Eighteenth Century Ch’ing China" (1984), University of California Press
  46. Zhang, Bo (張波), "On the plague in prisons in Qing dynasty(淸代監獄瘟疫問題硏究)", China Prison Journal (中國監獄學刊), 36(4) (2021)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)