과학적 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 사고 질문의 개념적 자원 활성화의 이해 -인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 중심으로-
Understanding the Role of Wonderment Questions Related to Activation of Conceptual Resources in Scientific Model Construction: Focusing on Students’ Epistemological Framing and Positional Framing
2
조회
0
다운로드
25
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구에서는 과학적 모형 구성 과정에서 사고 질문에 의한 개념적 자원의 활성화가 학생들의 인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이 밍에 따라 어떻게 달라지는지, 어떠한 맥락들이 학생들의 프레이밍에 영향을 미치는지를 알아보고자 하였다. 중학교 2학년 학생들이 네명씩 한 소집단을 이루어 배설 기작에 대한 소집단의 설명 모형을 협력적으로 구성하였다. 모형 구성 과정에서 다양한 사고 질문이 나타나며, 맥락에 따라 프레이밍이 변한 1개의 소집단을 초점집단으로 선정하였다. 담화 분석을 통해 모형 구성 과정에서 나타나는 학생들의 사고 질문과 개념적 자원의 활성화를 확인하였고, 그들의 인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 추론하여 이에 영향을 미친 맥락들을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 소집단 내에서 모형 구성 활동을 ‘현상 이해’로, 자신의 위치를 ‘촉진자’로 프레이밍 한 학생이 사고 질문으로 개념적 자원의 활성화를 촉진했지만, ‘교실 게임’과 ‘비응답자’로 프레이밍 한 다른 학생들에 의해 상호 작용이 단절되어 개념적 자원이 활성화되지 못하였다. 또한 학생들이 모두 ‘현상 이해’, ‘촉진자’와 ‘응답자’로 프레이밍 한 경우 사고 질문을 통해 개념적 자원을 활성화 시킬 수 있었지만, 학생들의 프레이밍이 ‘교실 게임’과 ‘수용자’로 전환되었을 때 활성화된 개념적 자원이 소집단의 모형 구성에 기여하지 못하였다. 그러나 ‘현상 이해’의 인식론적 프레이밍을 지속적으로 공유하고, ‘촉진자’와 ‘응답자’로 위치 짓기 프레이밍을 서로 역동적 으로 전환시킨 경우 학생들은 모두 동등한 인식적 권위를 갖고, 사고 질문을 통해 다양한 개념적 자원을 활성화시키며 소집단의 모형을 정교하게 발달시켰다. 이와 같은 모형 구성 과정에서 학생들의 프레 이밍은 인지적 어려움의 지속과 정답 제공자 또는 사고 촉진자로서 교사의 역할 등에 영향을 받았다. 본 연구는 과학 수업에서 생산적인 모형 구성 활동을 지원하는 인식론적 프레이밍과 위치 짓기 프레이밍의 기초 정보를 제공할 것으로 기대된다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore how students’ epistemological framing and positional framing affect the role of wonderment questions related to the activation of conceptual resources and to investigate what contexts affect students’ framings during scientific model construction. Four students were selected as focus group and they participated in collaborative scientific model construction of mechanisms relating to urination. According to the results, one student whose framings were "understanding phenomena" and "facilitator" asked wonderment questions, but the others whose framings were "classroom game" and "non-respondent" were not able to activate their conceptual resources. However, they were able to activate their conceptual resources when they shared the epistemological framing of "understanding phenomena" and shifted between the positional framings of "facilitator" and "respondent." Although they were able to activate their conceptual resources, these activated resources were not able to contribute to their model when they shifted to the framings of "classroom game" and "receiver." In contrast, when students constantly shared an "understanding phenomena" framing and dynamically shifted between the framings of "facilitator" and "respondent," they were able to activate various conceptual resources and develop their group model. The students’ framings were affected by the contexts. These included: when students were confronted with cognitive difficulties and were not provided proper scaffolding; when the teacher played the role of answer provider and guided the activity with correctness; when there were several possible explanatory models that students could choose from; and when the teacher played the role of thought facilitator. This study contributes to supporting teaching and learning environments for productive scientific model construction.
참고문헌 (42)
- Berland, L. K., "Framing for scientific argumentation", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), pp.68~94 (2012)
- Berland, L. K., "Classroom communities’ adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentation", Science Education, 95(2), pp.191~216 (2011)
- Leema K. Berland, "Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), pp.1082~1112 (2016), Wiley-Blackwell[DOI]
- Chin, C., "Learning in science : A comparison of deep and surface approaches", Journal of research in science teaching, 37(2), pp.109~138 (2000)
- Chin, C., "Student-generated questions : A meaningful aspect of learning in science", International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), pp.521~549 (2002)
- Chin, C., "Students’ questions : a potential resource for teaching and learning science", Studies in Science Education, 44(1), pp.1~39 (2008)
- Chin, C., "Students’ questions and discursive interaction : Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), pp.883~908 (2010)
- Clement, J. J., "Model based learning and instruction in science", pp.11~22 (2008), Springer Netherlands
- diSessa, A. A., "Toward an epistemology of physics", Cognition and instruction, 10(2), pp.105~225 (1993)
- Elby, A., "Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice", pp.409~434 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Engle, R. A., "Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement : Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom", Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), pp.399~483 (2002)
- Entwistle, N. J., "Understanding Student Learning" (1982), Croom Helms;Nichols Publishing Co
- Gilbert, J. K., "Developing models in science education", pp.19~40 (2000), Springer Netherlands
- Goffman, E., "Frame analysis : An essay on the organization of experience" (1974), Harper & Row
- Greeno, J. G., "A theory bite on contextualizing, framing, and positioning : A companion to Son and Goldstone", Cognition and Instruction, 27(3), pp.269~275 (2009)
- Hammer, D., "More than misconceptions : Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research", American Journal of Physics, 64(10), pp.1316~1325 (1996)
- Hammer, D., "The variability of student reasoning, lecture 3: manifold cognitive resources", Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI, pp.321~340 (2004), Italian Physical Society
- Hammer, D., "Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing", pp.169~190 (2002), Erlbaum
- Hammer, D., "Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective", pp.89~120 (2005), information Age Publishing
- Harré, R., "Positioning theory : Moral contexts of international action" (1999), Wiley-Blackwell
- Harrison, A. G., "Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules : Implications for teaching chemistry", Science education, 80(5), pp.509~534 (1996)
- Hogan, K., "Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions", Cognition and instruction, 17(4), pp.379~432 (1999)
- Hutchison, P., "Attending to student epistemological framing in a science classroom", Science Education, 94(3), pp.506~524 (2010)
- Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., ""Doing the lesson"or"doing science" : Argument in high school genetics", Science Education, 84(6), pp.757~792 (2000)
- Kuhn, D., "The skills of argument" (1991), Cambridge University Press
- 이은주, "변칙 사례에 대한 과학 영재 학생들의 반응에서 드러난 인식론적 프레이밍과 소집단 논변활동 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(3), pp.419~429 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Louca, L., "Epistemological resources : Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction", Educational Psychologist, 39(1), pp.57~68 (2004)
- MacLachlan, G., "Framing and interpretation" (1994), Melboume University Press
- Maskill, R., "Pupils’ questions, alternative frameworks and the design of science teaching", International Journal of Science Education, 19(7), pp.781~799 (1997)
- 오필석, "대안적 인지 이론으로서 ‘자원 기반 관점’에 대한 이론적 고찰과 시험 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), pp.971~984 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Passmore, C., "Model‐Based Inquiry and School Science : Creating Connections", School Science and Mathematics, 109(7), pp.394~402 (2009)
- Philips, S., "Functions of language in the classroom", pp.370~394 (1972), Teachers College Press
- Radinsky, J., "Camila, the earth, and the sun : Constructing an idea as shared intellectual property", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), pp.619~642 (2010)
- Rea-Ramirez, M. A., "Model based learning and instruction in science", pp.23~43 (2008), Springer Netherlands
- Redish, E. F., "A theoretical framework for physics education research:Modeling student thinking", Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School, Course CLVI, pp.1~63 (2004), Italian Physical Society
- Rosenberg, S., "Multiple epistemological coherences in an eighth-grade discussion of the rock cycle", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), pp.261~292 (2006)
- Scardamalia, M., "Text-based and knowledge based questioning by children", Cognition and instruction, 9(3), pp.177~199 (1992)
- Schwarz, C. V., "Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling : Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), pp.632~654 (2009)
- Tabak, I., "The teacher as partner : Exploring participant structures, symmetry, and identity work in scaffolding", Cognition and Instruction, 22(4), pp.393~429 (2004)
- Tannen, D., "Framing in discourse" (1993), Oxford University Press
- Tannen, D., "Framing in discourse", pp.57~76 (1993), Oxford University Press
- van de Sande, C. C., "Achieving alignment of perspectival framings in problem-solving discourse", Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(1), pp.1~44 (2012)