본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Practical Application of Quantitative HiSens Auto Rapid Plasma Reagin Latex Turbidimetric Immunoagglutination for Diagnosing Syphilis; Comparison Analysis between Rapid Plasma Reagin Latex Turbidimetric Immunoagglutination Test and Rapid Plasma Reagin Card Test

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity of quantitative RPR LTIA, HiSens Auto RPR LTIA (HBi Corp., South Korea) and to decide an adequate cutoff value for syphilis screening. Materials and Methods:A total of 549 serums or plasma specimens from patients were tested with RPR LTIA and RPR card tests. Degree of agreement between the two methods was analyzed, and validity of RPR LTIA test was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and ROC statistics of the RPR LTIA test were analyzed to decide an adequate cutoff value. Results:Agreement analysis showed slight to moderate agreement (k=0.093-0.588, P=0.000). Kappa value had its highest value at the cutoff value of 1.3 and 1.6 (k=0.588, P=0.000). Kappa value at the cutoff value of 1 ranked second (k=0.578. P=0.000). A plot of ROC curve showed a statistically valid result to differentiate between a syphilis test positive group and a syphilis test negative group (AUC=0.92, P=0.000). The cutoff values in RPR LTIA test ranged between 0.65 and 1.15 when both sensitivity and specificity were higher than 80%. Conclusion:HiSens Auto RPR LTIA test showed statistically valid result to differentiate between syphilis test groups. Considering the importance of sensitivity in screening for syphilis and the degree of agreement with RPR card test, the cutoff value of 1 in HiSens Auto RPR LTIA test is thought to be adequate.

Abstract

Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate validity of quantitative RPR LTIA, HiSens Auto RPR LTIA (HBi Corp., South Korea) and to decide an adequate cutoff value for syphilis screening. Materials and Methods:A total of 549 serums or plasma specimens from patients were tested with RPR LTIA and RPR card tests. Degree of agreement between the two methods was analyzed, and validity of RPR LTIA test was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and ROC statistics of the RPR LTIA test were analyzed to decide an adequate cutoff value. Results:Agreement analysis showed slight to moderate agreement (k=0.093-0.588, P=0.000). Kappa value had its highest value at the cutoff value of 1.3 and 1.6 (k=0.588, P=0.000). Kappa value at the cutoff value of 1 ranked second (k=0.578. P=0.000). A plot of ROC curve showed a statistically valid result to differentiate between a syphilis test positive group and a syphilis test negative group (AUC=0.92, P=0.000). The cutoff values in RPR LTIA test ranged between 0.65 and 1.15 when both sensitivity and specificity were higher than 80%. Conclusion:HiSens Auto RPR LTIA test showed statistically valid result to differentiate between syphilis test groups. Considering the importance of sensitivity in screening for syphilis and the degree of agreement with RPR card test, the cutoff value of 1 in HiSens Auto RPR LTIA test is thought to be adequate.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. Mller I, "Is serological testing a reliable tool in laboratory diagnosis of syphilis? Meta-analysis of eight external quality control surveys performed by the german infection serology proficiency testing program", J Clin Microbiol, 44, pp.1335~1341 (2006)
  2. Perryman MW, "Evaluation of a new rapid plasma reagin card test as a screening test for syphilis", J Clin Microbiol, 16, pp.286~290 (1982)
  3. Lynn WA, "Syphilis and HIV: a dangerous combination", Lancet Infect Dis, 4, pp.456~466 (2004)
  4. Hook EW 3rd, "Acquired syphilis in adults", N Engl J Med, 326, pp.1060~1069 (1992)
  5. Larsen SA, "Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis", Clin Microbiol Rev, 8, pp.1~21 (1995)
  6. ICDDRB, "Estimated deaths due to rotavirus in Bangladesh", Health Sci Bul, 4, pp.6~10 (2006)
  7. Ansari-Lari M, "Comparison between two tests results, kappa statistic instead of simple overall agreement", Vet Parasitol, 133, pp.369~370 (2005)
  8. Landis JR, "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data", Biometrics, 33, pp.159~174 (1977)
  9. Zweig MH, "Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine", Clin Chem, 39, pp.561~577 (1993)
  10. Hanley JA, "The meaning and use of area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve", Radiology, 143, pp.29~36 (1982)
  11. Grimes DA, "Uses and abuses of screening tests", Lancet, 359, pp.881~884 (2002)
  12. Geusau A, "Biological false positive tests comprise a high proportion of Venereal Disease Research Laboratory reactions in an analysis of 300,000 sera", Int J STD AIDS, 16, pp.722~726 (2005)
  13. Garner MF, "Chronic biological false- positive reactions to serological tests for syphilis in blood donors", J Clin Path, 23, pp.478~480 (1970)
  14. Garner MF, "The biological false positive reaction to serological tests for syphilis", J Clin Pathol, 23, pp.31~34 (1970)
  15. Peter CR, "False-positive reactions in the rapid plasma reagin-card, fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorbed, and hemagglutination treponemal syphilis serology tests", J Clin Microbiol, 9, pp.369~372 (1979)
  16. Lee KW, "Statistical analysis of serologic test for syphilis during five years", Korean J Dermatol, 17, pp.441~450 (1979)
  17. 노재광, "생화학 자동분석기용 Mediace RPR 검사의 성능 및 위양성 평가", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 28(4), pp.312~318 (2008), 대한진단검사의학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)