본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 교육에서 기능 중심의 과학 탐구에 대한 비판적 고찰

A Critical Review of the Skill-Based Approach to Scientific Inquiry in Science Education

오필석
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2020.04|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제40권 제2호|pp. 141-150|DOI https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.2.141

0

조회

0

다운로드

37

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

inquiryscience practice탐구과학적 실천기능 중심 접근Science-A Process Approach (SAPA)skill-based approach
주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 과학 탐구에 대한 기능 중심의 접근에 대해 비판 적으로 살펴보고 최근 과학 교육 개혁에서 강조되고 있는 과학적 실천의 의미를 시험적으로 탐색하는 것이었다. 이를 위하여 관련 문헌 들을 수집하여 고찰하였으며, 그 결과를 세부 주제에 따라 정리하였 다. Science-A Process Approach (SAPA)로 대표되는 기능 중심의 접근에서는 과학 탐구 기능들을 위계적으로 연계하여 제시하고, 이들은 전이성 또는 일반화 가능성이 높다고 주장하였으며, 발견을 통한 과학 학습을 강조하였다. 하지만 이러한 입장은 기능의 사용에 이론이 적재되어 있다는 현대 과학 철학의 관점과 상충되었으며, 탐구에서 사용되는 기능들이 내용-특이적 또는 맥락-의존적이라는 사실과 추상적인 과학 이론이나 원리는 귀납적으로 발견될 수 없다는 점에서 비판을 받아 왔다. 이와는 달리 과학적 실천을 강조하는 최근의 입장 에서는 과학적 실천을 총체적인 행위로 이해하고, 그것이 전개되는 양상은 내용이나 맥락에 따라 다르다는 점을 강조하며, 과학 수업에 서도 학생의 아이디어를 중요하게 고려하고자 한다. 이러한 연구 결과는 과학 탐구에 관한 일관된 관점을 정립하는 데 시사점을 제공함 으로써 새로운 과학 교육과정 개발에 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to critically review the skill-based approach to scientific inquiry in science education and to explore the meaning of science practices that are emphasized in recent science education reform movement. An extensive review of relevant literature was carried out, and the results were summarized according to the detailed themes of the study. In the skill-based approach of which Science-A Process Approach (SAPA) is a representative example, science process skills were presented as hierarchically connected with one another, they were believed to be transferable or generalizable, and science learning through discovery was stressed. These points of view are, however, contradicted with those of the modern philosophy of science which suggests the theory-laden nature of using the skills. The skill-based view has also been criticized by the fact that the use of inquiry skills is content-specific or context-dependent and that science theories or principles cannot be discovered by induction. In contrast, the recent view understands science practices holistically, emphasizes the diverse ways of doing the practices which vary with different contents or contexts, and considers student ideas importantly in the science classroom. The findings of this study can contribute to the development of a new science curriculum by providing implications for establishing a consistent view on scientific inquiry.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. AAAS Commission on Science Education, "Science teaching in elementary and junior high schools", Science, 133, pp.2019~2024 (1961)
  2. AAAS Commission on Science Education, "Readings in science education for the elementary school", pp.451~462 (1971), The Macmillan Company
  3. Xerox, , 1967
  4. Ault, C. R. Jr., "Challenging science standards" (2015), Rowman & Littlefield
  5. Ault, C. R. Jr., "Tracking the footprints puzzle : The problematic persistence of science-as-process in teaching the nature and culture of science", Science Education, 94, pp.1092~1122 (2010)
  6. Ausubel, D. P., "Readings in science education for the secondary school", pp.97~113 (1969), The Macmillan Company
  7. Bredderman, T., "Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes : A quantitative synthesis", Review of Educational Research, 53(4), pp.499~518 (1983)
  8. Bybee, R. W., "Scientific and engineering practices in K-12 classrooms : Understanding a framework for K-12 Education", Science Teacher, 78(9), pp.34~40 (2011)
  9. Chang, H., "Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science", pp.67~79 (2014), Routledge
  10. DeBoer, G. E., "A history of ideas in science education" (1991), Teachers College Press
  11. Erduran, S., "Introduction to the focus on scientific practices", Science Education, 99(6), pp.1023~1025 (2015)
  12. Erduran, S., "Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education" (2014), Springer Netherlands
  13. The impact of Gagné’s theories on practices. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, "Fields, D.", ~, pp.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 397 794 (1996)
  14. Finley, F. N., "Science processes", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(1), pp.47~54 (1983)
  15. Ford, M., "‘Grasp of practice’ as a reasoning resource for inquiry and nature of science understanding", Science & Education, 17, pp.147~177 (2008)
  16. Ford, M., "Educational implications of choosing"practice"to describe science in the Next Generation Science Standards", Science Education, 99(6), pp.1041~1048 (2015)
  17. Ford, M. J., "Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts", Review of Research in Education, 30, pp.1~32 (2006)
  18. Furtak, E. M., "Coming to terms : Addressing the persistence of"hands-on"and other reform terminology in the era of science as practice", Science Education, 103(1), pp.167~186 (2019)
  19. Gagné, R. M., "The psychological bases of Science-A Process Approach", pp.1~8 (1965), The Commission
  20. Gagné, R. M., "Elementary science : A new scheme of instruction", Science, 151(3706), pp.49~53 (1966)
  21. Gagné, R. M., "Learning by discovery: A critical appraisal", pp.135~150 (1966), Rand McNally
  22. Gagné, R. M., "Review of Research in Education", pp.3~33 (1973), Peacock
  23. Gray, R., "The distinction between experimental and historical sciences as a framework for improving classroom inquiry", Science Education, 98(2), pp.327~341 (2014)
  24. 하희수, "소집단 논변 활동에서 반응적 교수법이 학생들의 인식론적 프레이밍에 미치는 영향 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(1), pp.63~75 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  25. 허재완, "학습 발달과정 탐색을 통한 계절의 변화 교육과정 및 교수 계열 제안", 한국지구과학회지, 39(3), pp.260~274 (2018), 한국지구과학회[DOI]
  26. Hodson, D., "Rethinking the role and status of observation in science education", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(4), pp.381~396 (1986)
  27. Hodson, D., "Laboratory work as scientific method : Three decades of confusion and distortion", Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(2), pp.115~135 (1996)
  28. Hodson, D., "Science fiction : The continuing mispresentation of science in the school curriculum", Curriculum Studies, 6(2), pp.191~216 (1998)
  29. Irzik, G., "A family resemblance approach to the nature of science", Science & Education, 20, pp.591~607 (2011)
  30. Irzik, G., "International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching", pp.999~1021 (2014), Springer
  31. Kim, Y. -C., "Qualitative research methodology I" (2016), Academy Press
  32. Kirschner, P. A., "Epistemology, practical work and academic skills in science education", Science & Education, 1, pp.273~299 (1992)
  33. Kirschner, P. A., "Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work : An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquirybased teaching", Educational Psychologist, 41(2), pp.75~86 (2006)
  34. Livermore, A. H., "AAAS Commission on science education : Elementary science program", Journal of Chemical Education, 43, pp.270~272 (1966)
  35. Millar, R., "Skills and processes in science education: A critical analysis", pp.47~62 (1989), Routledge
  36. Millar, R., "Practical science: The role and reality of practical work in school science", pp.43~52 (1991), Open University Press
  37. Millar, R., "Practical work in school science: Which way now?", pp.16~31 (1998), Routledge
  38. Millar, R., "Beyond processes", Studies in Science Education, 14, pp.33~62 (1987)
  39. National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2012), The National Academies Press
  40. NGSS Lead States, "Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states" (2013), The National Academies Press
  41. Norris, S. P., "The philosophical basis of observation in science and science education", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(9), pp.817~833 (1985)
  42. 오필석, "대안적 인지 이론으로서 ‘자원 기반 관점’에 대한 이론적 고찰과 시험 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), pp.971~984 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  43. 오필석, "지구과학의 탐구 방법으로서 ‘복수 작업가설의 방법’의특징에 관한 탐색적 연구", 한국지구과학회지, 39(5), pp.501~515 (2018), 한국지구과학회[DOI]
  44. Oh, P. S., "Features of modeling-based abductive reasoning as a disciplinary practice of inquiry in earth science : Cases of novice students solving a geological problem", Science & Education, 28, pp.731~757 (2019)
  45. 오지언, "초등 과학 수업에서 ‘반응적 교수’의 실현 가능성 탐색", 초등과학교육, 36(3), pp.227~245 (2017), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  46. Osborne, J., "Practical work in school science: Which way now?", pp.156~175 (1998), Routledge
  47. Osborne, J., "Teaching scientific practices : Meeting the challenge of change", Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25, pp.177~196 (2014)
  48. Rouse, J., "Engaging science : How to understanding its practices philosophically" (1996), Cornell University Press
  49. Science-A Process Approach, product development report no. 8, "Sanderson, B. A.", Office of Program Planning and Evaluation, ~, pp.ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 064 066 (1971)
  50. Sears, P. B., "Statement of purposes and objectives of science education in school", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, pp.3~6 (1964)
  51. Soler, L., "Science after the practice turn in the philosophy, history, and social studies of science" (2014), Routledge
  52. Stroupe, D., "Describing"science practice"in learning setting", Science Education, 99(6), pp.1033~1040 (2015)
  53. The Ministry of Education, "High school curriculum(I)" (1992), The Ministry of Education
  54. The Ministry of Education, "Science 3-1" (2014), Mirae-N
  55. The Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum" (2015), The Ministry of Education
  56. The Ministry of Education, "Science 3-1 teachers’ guide" (2018), Visang
  57. The Ministry of Education, "Science 3-1" (2018), Visang
  58. Wellington, J. J., "‘What’s supposed to happen, sir?’ Some problems with discovery learning", School Science Review, 63(222), pp.167~173 (1981)
  59. Wellington, J., "Practical work in school science: Which way now?", pp.3~15 (1998), Routledge
  60. Wideen, M. F., "Comparison of student outcomes for Science-A Process approach and traditional science teaching for third, fourth, fifth, and sixth grade classes : A product evaluation", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(1), pp.31~39 (1975)

관련 논문AI추천

2015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 ‘기능’에 대한 비판적 검토권문호, 박종석한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2020 · 제40권 제2호탐구 기능의 직접적 수업을 위한 탐구 기능 하위 요소 추출강순희, 이은주한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2012 · 제32권 제2호초등과학교육에서 탐구과정기능의 활용배영부초등교육연구원 · 한국초등교육2009 · 제19권 제2호초중학교 과학 실험 탐구 과정에 대한 분석김영신사범대학부속중등교육연구소 · 중등교육연구2007 · 제55권 제1호초등 과학영재 사사과정에서 과학 탐구 기능 교육의 필요성에 대한 고찰박재용, 이기영한국영재학회 · 영재교육연구2022 · 제32권 제1호2015 개정 교육과정에서 나타나는 과학적 탐구 요소 분석: 과학탐구실험을 중심으로조헌국교과교육연구소 · 교과교육학연구2018 · 제22권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

통합과학 교과 역량에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석안유민, 변태진pp. 97-111문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT)을 활용한 과학교사의 교육실습 지도 분석김다애, 노태희, 김민환pp. 113-126명시적-반성적 접근을 활용한 모델링 수업이 초등학생들의 메타모델링 지식에 미치는 영향 탐색최승언, 임성은, 박창미, 김찬종pp. 127-1402015 개정 과학과 교육과정의 ‘기능’에 대한 비판적 검토권문호, 박종석pp. 151-1612015 개정 교육과정에서 초등과학과 교육과정 성취기준 분석 방법의 제안 -‘지구와 우주’ 영역을 중심으로-손준호pp. 163-175
원문 보기