본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

학생의 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 과학탐구활동 모형의 탐색

The Exploration of Open Scientific Inquiry ModelEmphasizing Students' Argumentation

송진웅|김희경
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2004.12|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제24권 제6호|pp. 1216-1234

0

조회

0

다운로드

62

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

argumentargumentation논변활동critical discussion개방적 탐구논변적 과학탐구 활동동료 검토용 보고서비판적 토론argumentative scientific inquiryopen scientific inquiryreport for peer review
주제분류교육학

초록

전통적인 학교 과학 실험은 실제 과학 활동, 즉 참과학탐구의 특징을 적절히 반영하고 있지 못하며, 특히 토론이나 논변적 실제가 부족하다는 비판이 제기되고 있다. 이에, 본 논문의 목적은 학생들의 동료간 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 탐구 활동을 제안하기 위해, 그 조건 및 특징을 알아보고 적절한 모형을 제안하는 것이다. 문헌 분석 및 이론적 논의를 바탕으로, 학생들의 논변활동을 촉진시키기 위해서 논변적 과학탐구 활동이 가져야 할 조건에 대하여 살펴 본 결과, 인지적 측면에서는 ‘다양한 견해가 가능한 문제 상황’, ‘학생 자신의 주장 펼치기’, ‘효과적으로 조직된 논변 구성의 기회’가 필요하며, 사회적 측면에서는 ‘수평적 관계’, ‘경쟁과 협력의 공동체 활동’이 필요한 것으로 분석되었다. 이러한 조건을 만족시키기 위해 논변적 과학 탐구 활동은 실험활동과 논변활동으로 구성되며 논변활동은 동료 검토용 보고서 쓰기와 비판적 토론으로 조직되었다. 논변활동은 조 내부와 조 별간에, 그리고 쓰기와 토론을 통해서 반복적으로 이루어지며 되먹임을 통해 실험활동과 연계되어 있으며 전체 탐구 과정은 순환적인 특징을 갖는다. 주요어: 논변적 과학탐구 활동, 논변활동, 개방적 탐구, 동료 검토용 보고서, 비판적 토론

Abstract

School science practical work is often criticized as lacking key elements of authentic science, such as peer argumentation or debate through which social consensus is obtained. The purpose of this paper is to review the recent studies about the argumentation and to explore the conditions and the model of argumentative scientific inquiry, which is specially designed open inquiry in order to facilitate students' peer argumentation. For this purpose, a theoretical discussion for the argumentative scientific inquiry as the way of authentic inquiry in schools was developed. The conditions for argumentative scientific inquiry were found to be the following: multiple arguments, students' own claims, opportunities for oral and written argumentation, equal status of debaters, and community of cooperative competition. For these conditions, the argumentative scientific inquiry was organized into experiment activities and argumentation activities. During argumentation activity, students should be guided to advance written argumentation through writing a group report for peer review and oral argumentation through a critical discussion. Through the argumentation between groups and in group, the students' arguments would be elaborated repeatedly. The feedback from argumentation links experiment activities to argumentation activities. Hence, the whole process of this inquiry model is circular.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. "토론의 방법" (2001), 커뮤니케이션북스
  2. "7차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 과학 교과서 물리단원 실험의 특징", pp.387~394 (2003)
  3. "신문사설의 논증 구조 분석", 127, pp.133~154 (2000)
  4. "논증 이론의 현황과 국어 교육의 과제 국어교육학연구", pp.237~285 (2001)
  5. "연세 한국어사전" (2002)
  6. "토의토론 학습과 중등학교 과학교육 1997년도 교과교육공동연구 결과 보고서" (1998), 한국학술진흥재단
  7. "토론의 논증 구성과 사회적 상호작용에 관한 연구" (2002)
  8. "과학 공동탐구 토론대회 보고서" (1994)
  9. "Small group discussions in physics peer interaction modes in pairs and fours Journal of Research in Science Teaching", pp.1099~1114 (1996)
  10. "Gender differences in small group discussions in physics International Journal of Science Education", pp.393~406 (1997)
  11. "Scientific arguments as learning artifacts designing for learning from the web with KIE International Journal of Science Education", pp.797~817 (2000)
  12. "Helping students learn from laboratory work", pp.27~31 (1999)
  13. "The theory and practice of argumentation" (1995)
  14. "The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction Review of Educational Research", pp.1~49 (1993)
  15. "An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science Journal of Research in Science Teaching", pp.623~654 (1998)
  16. "Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks", pp.175~218 (2002)
  17. "Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools" (1989)
  18. "Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic Journal of Research in Science Teaching", pp.483~499 (1998), inclusive Science Education
  19. "Using discussion in classroom" (1994), Open University Press
  20. "The Pupil as Scientist? Milton Keynes" (1983), The Open University Press
  21. "The Construction of Scientific Knowledge in School Classrooms Images of Science in Science Education", pp.83~105 (1989), The Falmer Press
  22. "Curriculum Development as Research A Constructivist Approach to Science Curriculum Development and Teaching Improving Teaching and Learning in Science and Mathematics", pp.83~106 (1996), Teachers College Press
  23. "Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms", pp.287~312 (2000)
  24. "What sort of science education do we really need? International Journal of Science Education", pp.661~679 (2002)
  25. "Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories Mechanisms of insight", pp.365~395 (1995), MIT Press
  26. "Promoting argumentation in middle school science students Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching" (1999)
  27. "Investigative work in the science curriculum" (1995), Open University Press
  28. "Helping students to do open investigation in science", pp.26~33 (1996)
  29. "부분과 전체" (1982)
  30. "Rethinking old ways:towards a more critical approach to practical work in school science", 22, pp.85~142 (1993)
  31. "Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science in and beyond the school laboratory Practical Work in School Science", pp.93~108 (1998)
  32. "Becoming critical about pratical about practical work changing views and changing practice through action research International Journal of Science Education", pp.683~694 (1998)
  33. "The laboratory in Science Education Foundations for the twenty-first century", pp.28~54 (2004)
  34. "the use of reason in argument" (2002), Inch
  35. "'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science' argument in high school genetics", pp.757~792 (2000)
  36. "Scientific Authority and Empirical Data in Argument Warrants about the Prestige Oil Spill Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching" (2004)
  37. "a pragmatic theory of argument" (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  38. "Students' reasoning about electricity combining performance assessment with argumentation analysis International Journal of Science Education", pp.849~871 (1998)
  39. "Discourse studies of science education a review of the literature Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching" (2001)
  40. "Epistemic levels in argument An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing", pp.314~342 (2002)
  41. "The ethnography of argumentation Emergence of Mathematical Meaning" (1995)
  42. "Thinking as argument", pp.155~178 (1992)
  43. "Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking", pp.319~337 (1993)
  44. "Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning", pp.287~315 (1997)
  45. "The construction of scientific facts" (1986), Princeton Princeton University Press
  46. "Intrinsic motivation in the classroom Research on Motivation in Education", pp.73~105 (1989), In C Academic Press
  47. "What scientific method and can it be taught? In J Skills and processes in Science Education" (1989)
  48. "What practical work in Science Education is really for Practical work in school science", pp.16~31 (1998)
  49. "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science International Journal of Science Education", pp.553~576 (1999)
  50. "and conceptual change in students' understanding of atomic structure", pp.505~525 (2002)
  51. "The Discourses of Science The University of Chicago Press" (1994)
  52. "Student disclosure of fraudulent practice in school laboratories Research in Science Education", pp.353~363 (1995)
  53. "Science in general education Science in general education" (1948), Brown Publishers
  54. "Analyzing arguments in science classroom discourse Can teachers' questions distort scientific authority? Journal of Research in Science Teaching", pp.27~45 (1983)
  55. "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching" (2002)
  56. "Using evidence in scientific reasoning Exploring characteristics of middle school students' argumentation Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association" (2001)
  57. "The structure of a scientific paper Philosophy of Science", pp.381~405 (1998)
  58. "University of Wisconsin Press" (1996)
  59. "The Uses of Argument" (1958)
  60. "Fundamentals of argumentation theory a handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  61. "Analysis of a student-generated inquiry discussion International Journal of Science Education", pp.115~142 (2000)
  62. "Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning" (1996), LEA
  63. "The role of practical work Good practice in science teaching what research has to say", pp.57~71 (2000), Open University Press
  64. "Students' discussions in practical scientific inquiries International Journal of Science Education", pp.25~45 (2004)
  65. "Practical work in science time for a reappraisal Practical work in school science", pp.3~15 (1998)
  66. "Language and literacy in science education" (2001), Open University Press
  67. "Scientists' views of science models of writing Journal of Research in Science Teaching", pp.338~369 (2004)
  68. "Scaffolding preservice science teachers' evidence-based arguments during an investigation of natural selection Research in Science Education", pp.437~463 (2002), Friedrichsen
  69. "The central role of fallacious thinking in science education", pp.483~496 (1997)
  70. "CategoriesArgument FromLook forRequest for InformationSignCommitmentPosition to KnowReferences to the project look at this Look for a request for action Look for opposition statement InferenceEvidence to HypothesisCorrelation to CauseCause to EffectConsequences Often based on plausibility rather than probability or use of a metaphor"

관련 논문AI추천

학생들의 보고서 쓰기에 대한 개방적 참탐구 활동 수행의 효과김미경한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2009 · 제29권 제8호탐구의 개방수준과 지식의 추상수준에 따른 학생들의 지식 구성과 과학적 논변활동에 대한 이해김희백, 이신영, 이영미한국생물교육학회 · 생물교육2015 · 제43권 제1호학교 과학교육에서의 과학적 논증활동을 위한 탐구학습 지도방법 탐색이효녕, 조현준대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2012 · 제5권 제2호과학적 논의과정 활동을 통한 학생들의 논의과정 변화 및 논의상황에 따른 논의과정 특성곽경화, 남정희한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2009 · 제29권 제4호소집단의 논변활동을 위한 과학 탐구 과제의 개발과 적용김희백, 윤선미한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2011 · 제31권 제5호배설에 대한 협력적 모델링 과정에서 나타난 중학교 학생들의 대화적 논변활동 탐색김희백, 이신영한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2017 · 제37권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)

초·중·고 학생들의 과학 태도 변화에 대한 학습환경의 원인 분석권치순, 김영신, 허명, 양일호pp. 1-28중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석남정희, 최경희, 최경순, 박종윤, 이기순, 최병순pp. 1039-1048예비 중등과학 교사들의 물체의 운동 개념의 과학사적 관점 분석백성혜, 김소연, 주지영pp. 1049-1062해결자·청취자 활동을 이용한 화학 문제 해결에서 소집단 구성 방법에 따른 효과강훈식, 성을선, 강석진, 정영선, 노태희pp. 1063-1069고등학교 과학 동아리 활동 경험이 학생들의 진로선택에 영향을 준 사례 연구박현주, 최원호, 우규환pp. 1070-1081
원문 보기