본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국가 수준의 과학문화 실태 진단을 위한 지표 체제 개발

Developing the indicator system for the national status quo of science culture

정민경|김희경|조숙경|임진영|최재혁|송진웅
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2008.06|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제28권 제4호|pp. 316-331

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

indicatorscientific literacyscience culturescience culture literacyinfrastructure of science culture
주제분류교육학

초록

During the past two decades or so, science (or scientific or scientific & technological) culture has become one of the main themes not only of policy makers but also of science educators. Although, the idea of science culture has been taken as a desirable goal, there is little agreement about what it means and how to measure it. Particularly in Korea, there has been a rapid growth of science culture projects and programs, either by governmental or non-governmental, but with little systemic monitoring and evaluation for its practice. The purpose of this study is, thus, to explore a model of measuring science culture and develop a comprehensive indicator system for it. We reviewed many literatures on definitions of science culture and the surveys for related terms, particularly, of recent national and international surveys (e.g. US Science and Engineering Indicators, Eurobarometer, Japanese Science and Technology Indicators). Based on this review, a model for science culture is proposed and then used to define the Science Culture Indicators (SCI). This model encompasses two dimensions(i.e. individual and social), which are further divided into two aspects (i.e. potential and practice). Each dimension is expected to represent citizen literacy of and national infrastructure of science culture respectively. Each category in this 2 2 matrix is further divided into several sub-categories. The discussion concerning how the model and the indicators can be used to check the states of science culture at social as well as individual levels will be given with some concrete examples, such as indicators particularly related to science education.

Abstract

During the past two decades or so, science (or scientific or scientific & technological) culture has become one of the main themes not only of policy makers but also of science educators. Although, the idea of science culture has been taken as a desirable goal, there is little agreement about what it means and how to measure it. Particularly in Korea, there has been a rapid growth of science culture projects and programs, either by governmental or non-governmental, but with little systemic monitoring and evaluation for its practice. The purpose of this study is, thus, to explore a model of measuring science culture and develop a comprehensive indicator system for it. We reviewed many literatures on definitions of science culture and the surveys for related terms, particularly, of recent national and international surveys (e.g. US Science and Engineering Indicators, Eurobarometer, Japanese Science and Technology Indicators). Based on this review, a model for science culture is proposed and then used to define the Science Culture Indicators (SCI). This model encompasses two dimensions(i.e. individual and social), which are further divided into two aspects (i.e. potential and practice). Each dimension is expected to represent citizen literacy of and national infrastructure of science culture respectively. Each category in this 2 2 matrix is further divided into several sub-categories. The discussion concerning how the model and the indicators can be used to check the states of science culture at social as well as individual levels will be given with some concrete examples, such as indicators particularly related to science education.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. 권재술, "국가수준의 과학 지식 평가 체제 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(4), pp.601~615 (1998)
  2. 김병목, "주요 선진국의 과학기술지표 체계 비교분석 연구" (2003), 한국과학기술기획평가원
  3. 김영식, "“과학문화”에 대한 다각적 고찰", 한국과학사학회지, 24(2), pp.238~250 (2002), 한국과학사학회
  4. 김영식, "한국의 과학문화 - 그 현재와 미래" (2003), 생각의 나무
  5. 김영인, "청소년의 부안 핵폐기장갈등 참여와 시민의식형성의 관련성 고찰", 청소년학연구, 12(1), pp.151~182 (2005), 한국청소년학회
  6. 김학수, "새로운 측정 모델을 이용한 과학기술 국민이해 조사연구 - 문제 및 이슈와 연관짓기를 중심으로 -", 기술혁신연구, 10(1), pp.124~147 (2002), 기술경영경제학회
  7. 박정, "우리나라 여학생과 남학생의 OECD", PISA 과학적 소양 평가 문항에서의 차별기능 분석, 2006, pp.26(3), 440~449[DOI]
  8. 수학․과학 성취도 추이변화 국제비교 연구-TIMSS 2003 결과 보고서, "박정", ~, pp.RRE 2004-3-2 (2004)
  9. 박희주, "새로운 과학문화: 과학기술과 사회의 관계 맺기. 한국의 과학문화-그 현재와 미래", pp.203~220 (2003), 생각의 나무
  10. 성태제, "문항반응이론 입문" (1991), 양서원
  11. 소원주, "중등학교 학생들의 과학의 본성 개념을 측정하기 위한 도구 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 18(2), pp.127~136 (1998)
  12. 송성수, "과학기술문화 하부구조에 관한 통계지표 분석", 과학기술정책, 143 (2003)
  13. 송성수, "과학기술문화활동의 진화와 특징에 관한 국제비교: 시스템 접근" (2004), 과학기술정책연구원
  14. 청소년 학교 밖 과학 활동 지원 시설에 대한 실태조사 및 DB 구축, "송진웅", 과학문화재단, ~, pp.제 2002-30호 (2002)
  15. 국민의 과학기술 이해도 측정을 위한 과학문화지표 개발, "송진웅", 과학문화연구센터, ~ (2006)
  16. 이경훈, "과학 관련 태도의 타당한 측정을 위한 연구 Ⅱ-“과학에 대한 태도”의 감정적 요소 측정을 위한 척도 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 16(2), pp.190~199 (1996)
  17. 2005년도 학업성취도 국제 비교 연구(PISA, "TIMSS)", 이미경, 2005, RRE 2005-2-1
  18. 이미경, "OECD", PISA 평가틀 및 공개 문항 분석-PISA 2000, PISA 2003, PISA 2006 공개문항-. 한국교육과정평가원 연구자료, ORM 2007-25, 2007
  19. PISA 2006 결과 분석 연구-과학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 수학적 소양 수준 및 배경 변인 분석, "이미경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRE 2007-1 (2007)
  20. 이미경, "TIMSS-R 과학 성취도에서의 성 차이", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1235~1244 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  21. 이영희, "과학기술 대중화의 새로운 모델", 한국정책학회보, 6(1), pp.204~229 (1997)
  22. 임경순, "과학기술 발전과 과학문화", 자연과학, 13, pp.105~110 (2002)
  23. 정광수, "과학문화의 개념과 의의. 한국의 과학문화-그 현재와 미래", pp.92~105 (2003), 생각의 나무
  24. 조숙경, "과학문화의 의미와 과제", 과학기술정책지, 143, pp.27~36 (2003)
  25. 조숙경, "과학커뮤니케이션: 과학문화의 실행", 한국과학기술학연구, 7(1), pp.151~175 (2007)
  26. 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론(3판)" (2003), 학현사
  27. 과학기술 분야 국민이해도 조사 보고서 2002, "한국과학문화재단", 한국과학문화재단, ~ (2002)
  28. 과학기술 분야 국민이해도 조사 보고서 2004, "한국과학문화재단", 한국과학문화재단, ~ (2004)
  29. 과학기술 분야 국민이해도 조사 보고서 2006, "한국과학문화재단", 한국과학문화재단, ~ (2006)
  30. Bauer, M.W., "Public knowledge of and attitudes to science: alternative measures that may end the “science war”", Science Technology & Human Values, 25(1), pp.30~51 (2000)
  31. Brossard, D., "Do they know what they read", Science Communication, 28, pp.47~63 (2006)
  32. Burns, T.W., "Science communication: a contemporary definition", Public Understanding of Science, 12, pp.183~202 (2003)
  33. DeBoer, G.E., "Scientific Literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), pp.582~601 (2000)
  34. European Commission, "European, Science and Technology-Public Understanding and Attitudes", ~ (1993)
  35. European Commission, "European, Science and Technology", ~ (2001)
  36. European Commission, "Europeans, Science and Technology", ~ (2005)
  37. European Commission, "Social Values, Science and Technology", ~ (2005)
  38. Gardener, P.L., "Attitudes to science", Studies in Science Education, 2, pp.1~41 (1975)
  39. Godin, B., "What is scientific and technological culture and how is it measured", A multidimensional model. Public Understanding of Science, 9, pp.43~58 (2000)
  40. Hagenduk, R.P., "The public understanding of science and public participation in regulated worlds", Minerva, 42, pp.41~59 (2004)
  41. Harlow, A., "Why students answer TIMSS science test items the way they do", Research in Science Education, 34, pp.221~238 (2004)
  42. Jegede, "School science and the development of scientific culture: a review of contemporary science education in Africa", International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), pp.1~20 (1997)
  43. Jenkins, E.W., "The relevance of science education project(ROSE) in England: a summary of findings. Centre for studies in science and mathematics Education" (2006), University of Leeds
  44. Koski, C.A., "The Human Genome Project: an examination of its challenge to the technological imperative", New Genetics and Society, 24(3), pp.267~281 (2005)
  45. Langksch, R.C., "Construction of a paper-and-pencil Test of Basic Scientific Literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the Americal Association for the Advancement of Science", Public Understanding of Science, 5, pp.331~359 (1996)
  46. Langksch, R.C., "Science literacy: A conceptual overview", Science Education, 84(1), pp.71~94 (2000)
  47. Martin, M.O., "TIMSS 2003 International Science Report: Findings from IEAs Trends In International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eight Grades" (2004), Boston College, Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy
  48. Massarani, L., "Attitudes towards genetics: a case study among Brazilian high school students", Public Understanding of Science, 14, pp.201~212 (2005)
  49. Miller, J.D., "The measurement of civic scientific literacy", Public Understanding of Science, 7, pp.203~223 (1998)
  50. Miller, J.D., "The acquisition and retention of scientific information by American adults. Free-choice science education-How we learn science outside if school", pp.93~114 (2001), Teachers college press
  51. Miller, J.D., "Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: what we know and what we need to know", Public Understanding of Science, 13, pp.273~294 (2004)
  52. Miller, S., "Public understanding of science at the crossroads", Public Understanding of Science, 10, pp.115~120 (2001)
  53. National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), "Science and Technology Indicators : 2004, A Systematic Analysis of Science and Technology Activities in Japan" (2004), NISTEP
  54. National Science Foundation, "Science and Engineering Indicators 2004: Volume 1. National Science Foundation: Arlington" (2004), Virginia
  55. National Science Foundation, "Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 1. National Science Foundation: Arlington" (2006), Virginia
  56. National Science Foundation, "Science and Engineering Indicators 2006: Volume 2. National Science Foundation: Arlington" (2006), Virginia
  57. Osborne, J., "Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications", International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), pp.1049~1079 (2003)
  58. Pardo, R., "Attitudes toward science among the European public: a methodological analysis", Public Understanding of Science, 11, pp.155~195 (2002)
  59. Roth, W.M., "Scientific literacy as collective praxis", Public Understanding of Science, 11, pp.33~56 (2002)
  60. Schreiner, C., "The Relevance of Science Education (ROSE)" (2006), Department of Teacher Education and School Development University of OSLO
  61. Snow, C.P., "The Two Cultures" (1959), Cambridge University Press
  62. Solomon, "School science and the future of scientific culture", pp.151~162 (1997), Routledge
  63. Jinwoong song, "Yet Another Paradigm Shift?:From Minds-on Herts-on", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(1), pp.129~145 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
  64. Sturgis, P., "Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes", Public Understanding of Science, 13, pp.55~74 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

과학문화지표체계 개발 및 적용 -중등교사를 대상으로-김성원, 김세미, 문공주한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2007 · 제27권 제9호과학관련 사회적 이슈에 대한 과학문화지표의 개발: ‘기후변화’를 중심으로김리경, 송진웅, 하은선한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2010 · 제30권 제4호한국의 과학교육 종합 지표 개발 연구강다연, 고수영, 김도경, 홍옥수한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2021 · 제41권 제6호미래 사회 한국인의 과학소양에 대한 요구 분석고훈영, 곽영순, 이영식, 전승준, 최성연한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2017 · 제37권 제3호‘과학적 소양’의 정의를 향하여이명제한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2009 · 제28권 제4호21세기 과학적 소양 평가기준 개발 및 교과서 내용 분석에의 적용김성원, 문공주, 문지영, 정윤숙, 조미영, Joseph Krajcik한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2012 · 제32권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

과학교사의 상ㆍ역할ㆍ능력의 탐색조희형, 고영자pp. 269-281R&E 프로그램을 체험한 과학영재들의 사사교육 프로그램 효과에 대한 인식: KAIST 신입생을 중심으로김경대, 심재영pp. 282-290묽은 용액의 성질에 대한 교과서 내용 분석 및 화학전공교사의 사고유형 조사김성혜, 벡성혜, 이은실pp. 291-301통합적 정신모형 이론에 기반한 4M 순환학습 수업모형의 효과: 고등학생의 원운동 관련 기초 개념과 정신모형의 발달 측면에서이경호, 박지연pp. 302-315중학교 과학수업에서 MBL실험 수업의 효과최병순, 신애경, 고석범, 이국행, 박금홍, 구양삼pp. 331-340
원문 보기