무인항공기 사생활 보호 방안
Privacy Protection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
무인항공기에 의한 사생활 침해는 신고를 필요로 하지 않는 소형 무인항공기에 장착된 영상정보처리기기로 인해 발생할 가능성이 크다. 본 논문에서는 무인항공기로부터의 사생활 보호를 위해 사생활 보호 관련 법령 - 개인정보보호법, 정보통신망법–등이 무인항공기에 장착된 영상정보처리기기의 이동성을 반영할 수 있도록 보완될 것을 제안한다. 이와함께, 사생활 침해의 우려가 가장 큰 미신고 소형 무인항공기에 대한 규정을 항공관련 법령에 포함할 것을 제안한다. 또한 피촬영자의 무인항공기 인지 및 촬영된 영상정보에 대한 비식별화 조치 등의 기술적 대응 방안을 제안한다.
Abstract
Privacy-right infringement using unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) usually occurs due to the unregistered small UAV with the image data processing equipment. In this paper we propose that privacy protection acts, Personal Information Protection Act, Information and Communications Network Act, are complemented to consider the mobility of image data processing equipment installed on UAV. Furthermore, we suggest the regulations for classification of small UAVs causing the biggest concern of privacy-right infringement are included in aviation legislations. In addition, technological countermeasures such as recognition of UAV photographing and masking of identifying information photographed by UAV are proposed.
참고문헌 (26)
- Teal Group, "2014 UAV Market Profile and Forecast", ~ (2014)
- 김선이, "무인항공기의 사생활 침해에 대한 법적 대응 : 미국 정책·입법안 분석을 중심으로", 항공우주정책 ·법학회지, 29(2), pp.137~163 (2014), 한국항공우주정책⋅법학회
- Ahn, J., "Double-sidedness of Covering Cases with Drone", Kwanhun Journal, 134, pp.114~120 (2015)
- Korea Internet & Security Agency, "2015Survey on Internet Issues", ~ (2016)
- 김종복, "국내 상업용 무인항공기 운용을 위한 법제화 고찰", 항공우주정책 ·법학회지, 28(1), pp.3~54 (2013), 한국항공우주정책⋅법학회
- Department of Defense, "Unmanned Aircraft System Roadmap 2005–2030", ~ (2005)
- Federal Aviation Administration, "Unmanned Air Vehicle Design Criteria", ~ (1996)
- Federal Aviation Administration, "Interim Operational Approval Guidance 08-01", ~ (2008)
- Civil Aviation Authority, "CAP 722, Unmanned Aircraft System Operations in UK Airspace – Guidance 6th Edition", ~ (2015)
- Civil Aviation Safety Authority, "Civil Aviation Safety Regulation 1998 Part 101, 2015 Compilation", ~ (2015)
- Cha, G., "Personal Video Privacy Issue to Increasing CCTV Installation", Communications of the Korea Information Science Society, 27(12), pp.25~33 (2009)
- 김영식, "차량용 블랙박스에 의한 개인정보침해 - 법적 규제의 필요성과 입법적 대안을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 14(3), pp.67~88 (2014), 경찰대학
- 이상학, "지리정보서비스에 관한 법적 고찰 – 인터넷 로드뷰를 소재로 하여 -", 법과정책연구, 14(2), pp.635~676 (2014), 한국법정책학회
- Karissa, B., "72% of Americans Refuse Google Glass Over Privacy Concerns", Mashable.com, ~ (2014)
- Costill, A., "Top 10 Places that Have Banned Google Glass", Searchenginejournal. com, ~ (2013)
- Bennett, C., "Civilian Drones, Privacy, and the Federal-State Balance", Brookings Institution, ~ (2014)
- Kaminski, M., "Drone Federalism:Civilian Drones and the Things They Carry", California Law Review Circuit, 4(57), pp.57~74 (2013)
- Park, Y., "Could Consumers’Privacy Concern about a Drone be Attenuated by Categorical Cue and Background-Image?", Theory and Practice in Marketing Asia, ~ (2016)
- Federal Aviation Administration, "Unmanned Aircraft Systems(UAS)Registration", ~ (2015)
- "Drone Aircraft Privacy and Transparency Act of 2015", 114th Congress (2015-2016) (2015)
- "Preserving American Privacy Act of 2015", 114th Congress (2015-2016) (2015)
- Information Commissioner’s Office, "In the picture : A data protection code of practice for surveillance cameras and personal information", ~ (2015)
- Korea Internet & Security Agency, "Japan, Prepared Aviation Act to Regulate Drone", ~ (2015)
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Enforcement Decree of the Aviation Act. Article", ~ (2010)
- Ministry of Security and Public Administration, "Personal Information Protection Act and Guide", ~ (2011)
- 2015 Parliamentary Inspection Report, "National Assembly Research Service", ~ (2015)