공공부문에서 드론 활용에 따른 개인정보 처리 관련 법제도 개선방안 연구
A Review on the Improvement of the Legal System for the Processing of Personal Information by the Use of Drone in Public Sector
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Because drones(Unmanned aerial vehicles) are mobile imaging devices that have a wide range of existing fixed CCTVs and can be deployed to areas or blind spots that are difficult for humans to access, they can respond very quickly and effectively to disaster response, search for missing persons, and emergency rescue. However, drones have a very wide range of filming possibilities, so if they are used indiscriminately, the filming and processing of personal information of many unspecified individuals unrelated to the public works can lead to serious infringement on the rights of the information subjects. Therefore, a constitutional review should be made on the conditions and scope of acceptance of personal information processing by the use of drones in the public sector. Among the information processed by using drones to carry out public affairs may include "personal information" that can identify individuals, which is a basic right guaranteed by the Korean Constitution, the right to self-determination of personal information. However, The right to personal information self-determination can be restricted to the law if necessary for national security, order maintenance or public welfare pursuant to Article 37 paragraph 2 of the Korean Constitution, which means that personal information can be processed in accordance with the provisions laid down in the law if necessary for the public interest, regardless of whether the information subject agrees or not. Although Korea's current Personal Information Protection Act, the Police Officer's Duty Execution Act, and the drone operation rules have major regulations that can be interpreted as legal grounds related to the use of drones and their handling of personal information, the current law does not have enough explicit grounds to handle personal information by utilizing drones under public authority. In order to address concerns over infringement of basic rights, such as the right to self-determination of personal information, which is expected due to extensive filming and personal information processing, the public sector needs to improve the legal system that can establish the use of restrained drones. Accordingly, in order to justify the handling of personal information by the use of drones in the public sector, this paper will review what problems there are under the current law and what improvements can be made to address these problems.
Abstract
Because drones(Unmanned aerial vehicles) are mobile imaging devices that have a wide range of existing fixed CCTVs and can be deployed to areas or blind spots that are difficult for humans to access, they can respond very quickly and effectively to disaster response, search for missing persons, and emergency rescue. However, drones have a very wide range of filming possibilities, so if they are used indiscriminately, the filming and processing of personal information of many unspecified individuals unrelated to the public works can lead to serious infringement on the rights of the information subjects. Therefore, a constitutional review should be made on the conditions and scope of acceptance of personal information processing by the use of drones in the public sector. Among the information processed by using drones to carry out public affairs may include "personal information" that can identify individuals, which is a basic right guaranteed by the Korean Constitution, the right to self-determination of personal information. However, The right to personal information self-determination can be restricted to the law if necessary for national security, order maintenance or public welfare pursuant to Article 37 paragraph 2 of the Korean Constitution, which means that personal information can be processed in accordance with the provisions laid down in the law if necessary for the public interest, regardless of whether the information subject agrees or not. Although Korea's current Personal Information Protection Act, the Police Officer's Duty Execution Act, and the drone operation rules have major regulations that can be interpreted as legal grounds related to the use of drones and their handling of personal information, the current law does not have enough explicit grounds to handle personal information by utilizing drones under public authority. In order to address concerns over infringement of basic rights, such as the right to self-determination of personal information, which is expected due to extensive filming and personal information processing, the public sector needs to improve the legal system that can establish the use of restrained drones. Accordingly, in order to justify the handling of personal information by the use of drones in the public sector, this paper will review what problems there are under the current law and what improvements can be made to address these problems.
참고문헌 (29)
- 선제적 규제 혁파 로드맵: 드론 분야, "관계부처 합동", ~ (2019)
- 권건보, "개인정보보호와 자기정보통제권" (2005), 경인문화사
- 권건보, "개인정보 보호의 법과 정책" (2016), 박영사
- 지능정보사회 대응을 위한 개인정보보호 법제 정비방안, "권건보", 개인정보보호위원회, ~ (2017)
- 권양섭, "범죄예방 및 수사에 있어서 드론(Drone)의 활용과 한계에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 19(1), pp.255~272 (2019), 한국법학회
- 권형둔, "항공안전법에 대한 사후적 입법평가: 드론을 중심으로" (2018), 법제연구원
- 김강한, "공공의료부문에서 개인건강정보 자기결정권 연구", 박사, pp.2019
- 김강한, "실종자 발견을 위한 개인정보 처리 관련 법제도의 개선방안 검토", 아주법학, 13(4), pp.7~37 (2020), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 김양현, "드론의 민간경비 활용과 문제점 검토", 한국민간경비학회보, 15(5), pp.25~54 (2016), 한국민간경비학회
- 인공지능 및 로보틱스 분야의 개인정보보호에 관한 연구, "김종현", 개인정보보호위원회, ~ (2016)
- 김중수, "드론의 활용과 안전 확보를 위한 항공법상 법적 규제에 관한 고찰", 법학논총, 39(3), pp.267~298 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 류성진, "드론의 상용화(常用化)에 따른 안전과 법적 문제", 법제연구, (51), pp.241~282 (2016), 한국법제연구원
- 박원규, "경찰의 신체부착형 영상촬영기기 사용에 관한 법적연구 - 경찰작용법상 수권조항 및 기본권 보장적 관점을 중심으로-", 입법과 정책, 10(2), pp.5~32 (2018), 국회입법조사처[DOI]
- 박주희, "폴리스캠ㆍ드론 활용에 따른 공공부문 개인영상정보 규율체계 방향", 법조, 69(2), pp.114~143 (2020), 법조협회[DOI]
- 드론(무인비행장치) 카메라 관련 개인정보보호 가이드라인 연구, "박훤일", 개인정보보호위원회, ~ (2016)
- 박훤일, "혁신적 신기술의 개인정보보호에 관한 국제 비교 - 드론 카메라를 중심으로 -", 국제거래법연구, 25(2), pp.123~144 (2016), 국제거래법학회
- 성낙인, "헌법학" (2020), 법문사
- 신승균, "무인항공기 활용에 따른 법제도적 쟁점사항 검토", 한국민간경비학회보, 14(3), pp.49~70 (2015), 한국민간경비학회
- 윤지영, "법집행기관의 드론 이용에 관한 법적 쟁점과 입법적 개선 방안", 형사법의 신동향, (51), pp.108~137 (2016), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 경찰활동에서의 드론(무인항공기) 활용방안과 그 법적 문제연구, "이상원", 치안정책연구소, ~ (2016)
- 이영우, "웨어러블 폴리스캠의 활용 방안 연구", 인문사회 21, 7(5), pp.251~265 (2016), 인문사회 21[DOI]
- 이원규, "드론(Drone)을 활용한 도시관리", BDI 정책포커스, (288) (2015), 부산발전연구원
- 전상현, "개인정보자기결정권의 헌법상 근거와 보호영역", 저스티스, 169, pp.5~36 (2018), 한국법학원[DOI]
- 영상정보처리기기 확대에 따른 개인정보보호 대책, "정상호", 개인정보보호위원회, ~ (2015)
- 정연주, "헌법학원론" (2020), 법영사
- 조정우, "경찰의 드론 운용의 법률적 검토", 법학연구, 19(2), pp.381~406 (2019), 한국법학회
- 허영, "한국헌법론" (2020), 박영사
- Drones in Canada: Will the proliferation of domestic drone use in Canada raise new concerns for privacy?, "Office of the Privacy Commission of Canada", ~ (2013)
- Taly Matiteyahu, "Drone Regulations and Fourth Amendment Rights:The Interaction of State Drone Statutes and the Reasonable Expectation of Privacy", Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 48(2) (2015)
