본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중학교 과학수업에서 과학적 모형의 사회적 구성을 촉진하는 교사 스캐폴딩 분석

An Analysis of Teacher’s Scaffolding for Promoting Social Construction of Scientific Models in Middle School Science Classes

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구에서는 중학교 과학적 모형의 사회적 구성 수업에서 사회적 구성을 촉진하는 교사 스캐폴딩의 특징을 알아보기 위해 중학교 2학년 8개 소집단에게 소리의 발생과 전달을 주제로 수업을 진행하여 3차시 동안 모형의 사회적 구성 수준과 수준의 변화를 탐색하고, 사회적 구성을 촉진하는 교사 스캐폴딩을 대상, 목적, 방법으로 분석하여 사회적 구성을 촉진하는 교사 스캐폴딩의 특징을 살펴보았다. 사회적 구성을 촉진하기 위한 교사 스캐폴딩은 첫째, 개인의 인지 발달보다 소집단을 대상으로 스캐폴딩을 지원하고 있었다. 둘째, 결과적 도움 보다 과정적 도움을 지속적으로 제공해 주어 참여와 토론을 강조하고 있었다. 셋째, 학생들의 요구와 수준에 맞는 전략을 제공하기 위하여 진단 전략과 진단 점검을 사용하여 학생들의 이해 정도와 상황을 파악하고 학생들에게 적합한 전략을 제공하고 있었다. 이러한 결과를 토대로 과학적 모형의 사회적 구성을 촉진하기 위해 교사가 스캐폴딩을 어떻게 지원해야하는지에 대한 시사점을 얻을 수 있었다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to figure out the characteristics of teacher’s scaffolding that can promote the social construction of scientific models by analyzing a teacher’s scaffolding that actually promoted the social construction in a real classroom context, so that we can better understand the teacher’s scaffolding. For this study, a total of 32 middle school students and their science teacher in Seoul were observed and videotaped. The level of social construction were categorized in four stages. We divided the teacher’s scaffolding by whether the level of social construction has changed or not, and analyzed teacher’s scaffolding in each group. Teacher’s scaffolding were categorized based on its object, purpose and means. The object were categorized into two types; small-group and individual. The purpose were categorized into two types; process-help and product-help. The means were coded into Diagnostic strategies(Reading, Listening, Questioning), Checking diagnosis and Intervention strategy(Instruct, Explain, Hint, Confirm). The result show that teacher’s scaffolding is helpful in the social construction of scientific models when it supports small-groups more than individuals, and process-help more than product-help. It also shows that in diagnostic strategies, questioning and listening are effective. Finally, using checking diagnosis promoted interactions among students and a ‘confirm’ intervention strategy should be avoided because it has no positive effect on changes in the level of social construction. This study provides the features of the teacher’s scaffolding that promotes social construction of scientific models in middle school classes.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 배대성, "중학생의 힘과 운동 현상 관련 과학적 모형구성 수준의 상세화", 새물리, 62(8), pp.809~825 (2012), 한국물리학회[DOI]
  2. 장지은, "초파리 유전 실험 결과 해석에서 보인 중학교 과학영재들의 설명모형 탐색", 생물교육, 42(2), pp.219~235 (2014), 한국생물교육학회
  3. Chiu, M. M., "Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning : How to improve student problem solving and time on-task", American educational research journal, 41(2), pp.365~399 (2004)
  4. Cho, J. I., "The meanings of teaching science as inquiry and change of conditions for inquiry science education", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 10(1), pp.65~75 (1990)
  5. Dekker, R., "Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), pp.39~65 (2004)
  6. Ding, M., "Teacher interventions in cooperative-learning mathematics classes", The Journal of Educational Research, 100(3), pp.162~175 (2007)
  7. Gilbert, J. K., "Models and modelling : Routes to more authentic science education", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), pp.115~130 (2004)
  8. Gillies, R. M., "The effects of communication training on teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative learning", International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), pp.257~279 (2004)
  9. Gunawardena, C. N., "Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing", Journal of educational computing research, 17(4), pp.397~431 (1997)
  10. 한문현, "초등학생의 먹이 그물 모형 구성에서 교사 질문 단서의 역할", 생물교육, 41(2), pp.296~309 (2013), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
  11. Ingham, A. M., "The use of analogue models by students of chemistry at higher education level", International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), pp.193~202 (1991)
  12. Jadallah, M., "Influence of a teacher’s scaffolding moves during child-led small-group discussions", American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), pp.194~230 (2011)
  13. 강은희, "심장 혈액 흐름의 모형 구성 과정에서 나타난 소집단 상호작용과 소집단 규범", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.372~387 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  14. 김소정, "과학적 모델의 사회적 구성 수업에서 구현된 두 과학 교사의 실천적 지식의 내용", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(4), pp.807~825 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  15. Kim, Y. J., "Aspects and Effects of Constraints in Students’ Scientific Model Co-construction", master, pp.2015
  16. 이선경*, "소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징", 대한화학회지, 50(1), pp.79~88 (2006), 대한화학회
  17. 이신영, "소집단 상호작용에 따른 심장 내 혈액 흐름에 대한 소집단 모델 발달 유형과 추론 과정 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(5), pp.805~822 (2012), 한국과학교육학회
  18. Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1990), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  19. Many, J. E., "An exhibition and analysis of verbal tapestries : Understanding how scaffolding is woven into the fabric of instructional conversations", Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), pp.376~407 (2002)
  20. Mercer, N., "Reasoning as a scientist : Ways of helping children to use language to learn science", British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), pp.359~377 (2004)
  21. Ministry of Education(MOE)., "Middle school Science Curriculum" (2015), Ministry of Education
  22. 오필석, "지식 공유의 관점에서 본 과학 교실 담화의 사례", 한국과학교육학회지, 27(4), pp.297~308 (2007), 한국과학교육학회
  23. Oliveira, A. W., "Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), pp.634~658 (2008)
  24. 박현주, "연소의 과학적 모형형성 수업에서 나타난 중학생의 사회적 상호작용 특징", 대한화학회지, 58(4), pp.393~405 (2014), 대한화학회[DOI]
  25. Rea-Ramirez, M. A., "Model based learning and instruction in science", pp.23~43 (2008), Springer Netherlands
  26. Richmond, G., "Making meaning in classrooms : Social processes in small‐group discourse and scientific knowledge building", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), pp.839~858 (1996)
  27. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., "Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry", Journal of research in science teaching, 44(1), pp.57~84 (2007)
  28. Schwarz, C. V., "Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners" (2009)
  29. Scott, P., "Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms:A Vygotskian analysis and review" (1998)
  30. Shepardson, D. P., "Zones of interaction : Differential access to elementary science discourse", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), pp.443~466 (2006)
  31. 심영숙, "연소 모델의 사회적 구성과정에서 나타나는 소집단 활동 특징 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(2), pp.217~229 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  32. Song, Y. J., "A Case Study for Model Change of Elementary School Students Through Co-construction of Scientific Model", master, pp.2015
  33. Stahl, G., "A model of collaborative knowledge-building", Fourth international conference of the learning sciences, pp.70~77 (2000), Erlbaum
  34. van de Pol, J., "Patterns of contingent teaching in teacher–student interaction", Learning and Instruction, 21(1), pp.46~57 (2011)
  35. Vosniadou, S., "Model-Based Reasoning", pp.353~368 (2002), Springer US
  36. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society" (1978), Harvard University Press
  37. Webb, N. M., "Productive helping in cooperative groups", Theory into practice, 41(1), pp.13~20 (2002)
  38. Windschitl, M., "Beyond the scientific method : Model‐based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations", Science education, 92(5), pp.941~967 (2008)
  39. Wood, D., "6 Aspects of teaching and learning", Learning to think, 2, pp.97~ (1991)
  40. 유희원, "달의 위상 변화에 대한 과학적 모형 구성 수업에서 나타나는 과학 영재들의 모형 생성 및 발달 과정", 영재교육연구, 22(2), pp.291~315 (2012), 한국영재학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)