본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

TIMSS 2023 과학 인지 영역 분석틀을 활용한 2015 개정 및 2022 개정 초등 과학과 성취 기준 분석

Analysis of the 2015 Revised and 2022 Revised Elementary School Science Achievement Standards Using the TIMSS 2023 Scientific Cognitive Domain Analysis Framework

신성찬
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2024.06|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제44권 제3호|pp. 249-262|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2024.44.3.249

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

생명과학물질ReasoningLife ScienceMaterials알기Knowing2022 개정 과학과 교육과정지구와 우주2015 개정 과학과교육과정운동과 에너지추론하기적용하기Earth and SpaceTIMSS 2023 과학 인지 영역 분석틀과학과 사회TIMSS 2023 scientific cognitive domain analysis framework2015 revised science and curriculum2022 revised science and curriculumApplyingMotion and EnergyScience and Society
주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 TIMSS 2023 과학 인지 영역 분석틀을 활용하여2015 개정과 2022 개정의 과학과 교육과정의 성취 기준을 분석하는것이다. 연구 대상은 2015 개정과 2022 개정 과학과 교육과정에서초등 전 영역의 성취 기준이다. 연구 분석에는 초등과학교육을 전공한 3명의 현장 교사와 초등과학교육전문가 1명이 참여하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 2022 개정 운동과 에너지 분야에서‘알기’ 영역의 비율은 2015 개정보다 약 16% 높았고, ‘추론하기’ 영역의 비율도 약 5.8% 증가하였다. 둘째, 물질 분야에서 TIMSS 2023 인지 영역의 비율은 학년군과 교육과정의 개정 시기와 관련 없이 ‘알기’, ‘적용하기’, ‘추론하기’의 순이었다. 셋째, 생명과학 분야에서TIMSS 2023 인지 영역의 비율은 학년군과 교육과정의 개정 시기에따라 달랐다. 넷째, 2022 개정의 지구와 우주 분야 또한 다른 세 영역과 유사하게 ‘알기’ 영역의 비율은 증가하였고 ‘적용하기’ 영역은 감소하였다. 하지만 2022 개정에서 다른 세 분야의 ‘추론하기’ 영역은모두 증가하였는데 지구와 우주 분야에서만 감소하였다. 다섯째, 2015 개정 통합 단원과 2022 개정 과학과 사회 분야에서는 ‘알기’ 영역의 ‘인식하기’와 ‘예 제시하기’, ‘적용하기’ 영역의 ‘관계짓기’와‘설명하기’, ‘추론하기’ 영역의 ‘종합하기’ 요소만 다루고 있었다. 2022 개정 초등 전체 과학 분야에서 ‘알기’ 영역의 비율은 52.5%, ‘적용하기’ 영역의 비율은 33.8%, ‘추론하기’ 영역의 비율은 13.7%였다. 결론적으로 2022 개정 초등 과학과 성취 기준에서 ‘알기’ 영역의의존도가 너무 높았기 때문에 ‘적용하기’와 ‘추론하기’ 영역의 비율이낮았다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the achievement standards of the 2015 revision and 2022 revision of the science curriculum using the TIMSS 2023 science cognitive domain analysis framework. The subject of the study is the achievement standards for all elementary school areas in the 2015 and 2022 revised science curriculum. Three field teachers and one elementary science education expert who majored in elementary science education participated in the research analysis. The results of this study are as follows. First, in the 2022 revised movement and energy field, the ratio of the ‘knowing’ area was about 16% higher than the 2015 revision, and the ratio of the ‘reasoning’ area also increased by about 5.8%. Second, in the material field, the proportion of TIMSS 2023 cognitive domains was in the order of ‘knowing’, ‘applying’, and ‘reasoning’ regardless of grade group and curriculum revision period. Third, in the field of life sciences, the proportion of TIMSS 2023 cognitive domains differed depending on grade group and curriculum revision period. Fourth, in the Earth and Space field of the 2022 revision, similar to the other three fields, the proportion of the ‘Knowing’ field increased and while the ‘Applying’ field decreased. However, in the 2022 revision, the ‘reasoning’ area in all three other fields increased, but decreased only in the earth and space fields. Fifth, the 2015 revised integrated unit and the 2022 revised science and society field only covered the elements of ‘recognizing’ and ‘presenting examples’ in the ‘knowing’ area, ‘making relationships’ and ‘explaining’ in the ‘applying’ area and ‘Synthesize’ in the ‘reasoning’ area. In the 2022 revised elementary school science field, the proportion of the ‘knowing’ section was 52.5%, the proportion of the ‘applying’ section was 33.8%, and the proportion of the ‘reasoning’ section was 13.7%. In conclusion, in the 2022 revised elementary science achievement standards, the ratio of the ‘applying’ and ‘reasoning’ areas was low because the reliance on the ‘knowing’ area was too high.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Cheong, Y., "Consideration on the Contents of the Electromagnetism Domain in the 2022 Revised Elementary School Science Curriculum", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), pp.186~198 (2022)
  2. ERISNU(Educational Research Institute Seoul National University), "The Dictionary of Educational Studies" (2011), Hawoo
  3. Han, J., "Analyzing the adequacy of the Contents of the 2022 Revised Science Curriculum-Elementary School ‘Earth and Universe’ Units-", School Science Journal, 17(2), pp.120~137 (2023)
  4. Hong, M., "Analysis of Korean Middle School Student Science Achievement at International Benchmarks in TIMSS 2003", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(2), pp.246~257 (2006)
  5. "TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks" (2019)[URL]
  6. "TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks" (2023)[URL]
  7. Jho, H., "Comparing the 2015 with the 2022 Revised Primary Science Curriculum Based on Network Analysis", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 42(1), pp.178~193 (2023)
  8. Jho, H., "Network Analysis of Achievement Standards Relevant to the Concept of Energy Presented in the 2022Revised National Curriculum of Science", Jounral of Energy and Climate Change Education, 13(2), pp.125~136 (2023)
  9. Kang, K., "Comparison of Achievement Standards in the Life Science of 2015 and 2022 Revised Curriculum Based on Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy", The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 26(3), pp.103~119 (2023)
  10. Kim, H., "Analysis of Climate Change–Related Content in the New Jersey Student Learning Standard and the 2022 Revised Science National Curriculum", Jounral of Energy and Climate Change Education, 13(2), pp.163~172 (2023)
  11. Kim, H., "Comparison between TIMSS 2019 science framework and Korea elementary school science curriculum", Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 19(21), pp.497~516 (2019)
  12. Kim, J., "International Comparison of Cognitive Attributes using Analysis on Science Results at TIMSS 2011 Based on the Cognitive Diagnostic Theory", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), pp.267~275 (2015)
  13. Trends in international mathematics and science study: Report of TIMSS 2007 Results, "Kim, K.", KICE, ~ (2007)
  14. Kim, M., "A Content Analysis of Biology Domain of Korean and Singaporean Textbooks Based on the TIMSS Framework", Biology Education, 39(2), pp.217~234 (2011)
  15. Kim, S., "The Relationship Analysis of the Korean Science Curriculum with the Physical Science Domains of the 4th Grade TIMSS 2019", Journal of Science Education, 45(1), pp.1~10 (2021)
  16. Kim, W., "Analysis of achievement standards for 3rd and 4th grade elementary school students in the 2022 revised science curriculum based on Bloom’s new classification of educational goals", The Korean Elementary Science Education Society Academic Conference Materials Collection, 85, pp.67~ (2024)
  17. Kim, Y., "A Comparative Study of Elementary Science Curriculum between Korea and USA-Focusing on Earth and Space Domain of Third and Fourth Grades-", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), pp.362~376 (2016)
  18. Kwak, Y., "Analysis of Features of Korean Fourth Grade Students`TIMSS Science Achievement in Content Domains with Curriculum Change", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(4), pp.599~609 (2017)
  19. Kwak, Y., "Analysis of Features of Korean Eighth Grades’ TIMSS 2015 Achievement in Chemistry", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), pp.625~633 (2018)
  20. Kwak, Y., "Ways to Restructure Science Convergence Elective Courses in Preparation for the High School Credit System and the 2022 Revised Curriculum", Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 14(2), pp.112~122 (2021)
  21. Kwak, Y., "Analysis of Features of Korean Eighth Grade Students’ TIMSS 2015 Achievement in Life Science", Biology Education, 45(3), pp.350~363 (2017)
  22. Kwak, Y., "Exploring Ways to Improve Integrated Science and Science Laboratory Experiments in Preparation for the 2022Revised Curriculum", Journal of Science Education, 45(2), pp.143~155 (2021)
  23. Kwon, Y., "Science Education -From thinking to learning-" (2013), Bookshill
  24. Landis, J. R., "The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data", Biometrics, 33(1), pp.159~174 (1977)
  25. Lee, G., "Trends and Issues of the Korean National Curriculum Documents’ Subject-Matter Content System Table : Focusing on the Science Subject Case", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 44(1), pp.87~103 (2024)
  26. Lee, I., "Ways to Restructure Science Elective Courses in Preparation for the High School Credit System and the 2022 Revised Curriculum", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 41(2), pp.145~154 (2021)
  27. Lee, J., "Characteristics of the 2015 and 2022 Revised National Curriculum and Future Tasks Through International Comparative Study", Journal of the future of Society, 14(1), pp.35~61 (2023)
  28. Lee, J., "Science Knowledge and Scientific Emotion during the Generation of Biological Hypotheses in High School Students", Biology Education, 37(2), pp.229~243 (2009)
  29. Exploring the support system for curriculum implementation in the 2022 Revised National Curriculum, "Lee, J.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Report RRC 2022-3 (2022)
  30. Lee, S., "Comparison and Analysis of the 2009 Elementary Science Curriculum of South Korea and the Elementary Science Curriculum of Finland", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 33(3), pp.491~509 (2014)
  31. Lim, Y., "A critical review of the ‘key ideas’ in the 2022 revised national curriculum", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 23(18), pp.747~768 (2023)
  32. MOE(Ministry of Education), "2025 Revised Science Education Curriculum", MOE, ~ (2015)
  33. MOE(Ministry of Education), "2022 Revised Science Education Curriculum", MOE, ~ (2022)
  34. Mullis, I. V. S., "TIMSS 2019 progress report", 5th Meeting of National Research Coordinators (2019)
  35. Prospects and tasks of international comparative study on mathematics achievement : Outcomes and tasks of international comparative study of student achievement, "Park, K.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Report RRC 2015-4 (2015)
  36. Trends International Mathematics and Science Study: TIMSS 2019 main survey, "Park, S.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Report, RRE 2019-10 (2019)
  37. International comparative study on changes in math and science achievement trends : Analysis of TIMSS 2019 results, "Sang, K.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Rreport RRE 2020-10 (2020)
  38. The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): In-depth analysis of TIMSS 2015, "Sang, K.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Report RRE 2017-5-1 (2017)
  39. In-depth analysis of TIMSS 2019 results and change trends, "Seo, M.", KICE, ~, pp.Research Report RRE 2021-5 (2021)
  40. Shin, Y., "Contents Analysis of the 2022 Revised Curriculum related to the Climate Change Education", Jounral of Energy and Climate Change Education, 13(1), pp.23~34 (2023)
  41. 2022 revised science curriculum draft (final draft)development policy research final report, "Shin, Y.", KOFAC, ~ (2022)
  42. Research on the development of the 2022revised science curriculum plan, "Shin, Y.", KOFAC, ~ (2022)
  43. Song, E., "Analysis of the Verbs in the 2009 Revised National Science Curriculum-from the Viewpoint of Cognitive Domain of TIMSS Assessment Framework", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(4), pp.607~616 (2016)
  44. Yoon, J., "A Conceptual Analysis of Reflection in Learning and Its Application in the Curriculum Design", The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), pp.1~27 (2022)
  45. Yu, E., "Improving the 2022 Revised Science Curriculum : Elementary School ‘Earth and Universe’ Units", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 41(2), pp.173~185 (2022)

관련 논문AI추천

2022 개정 초등학교 과학과 교육과정 성취기준 진술 분석박기락한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2024 · 제43권 제2호교육과정 변화에 따른 우리나라 초등학교 4학년 학생들의 TIMSS 과학 내용영역별 성취 특성 분석곽영순한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2017 · 제37권 제4호Bloom의 신교육목표분류에 따른 2022 개정 과학과 교육과정초등학교 3∼4학년군 성취기준 분석 및 2015 개정 교육과정과의 비교권난주, 김동석, 김우중, 신영준, 오필석한국초등과학교육학회 · 초등과학교육2024 · 제43권 제3호2022 개정 초등 과학과 교육과정과 과학교육표준(KSES)의 연관성 분석권유지, 이효녕과학교육연구소 · 과학교육연구지2024 · 제48권 제3호2022 개정 과학과 교육과정 학습 내용의 적정성 분석 -초등학교 ‘지구와 우주’ 영역을 중심으로-권유지, 오현석, 한제준한국현장과학교육학회 · 현장과학교육2023 · 제17권 제2호2015 개정 교육과정에서 초등과학과 교육과정 성취기준 분석 방법의 제안 -‘지구와 우주’ 영역을 중심으로-손준호한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2020 · 제40권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)

인공지능 문장 분류 모델 Sentence-BERT 기반 학교 맞춤형 고등학교 통합과학 질문-답변 챗봇 -개발 및 1년간 사용 분석-유준희, 민경모pp. 231-248예비 과학교사의 통합교육 실천에 대한 교사효능감임성민, 김준희, 이소진pp. 263-271자생적 과학문화 실천과정으로서의 가족팬덤 형성과정에 대한 문화기술지 연구 -국립해양생물자원관 가족프로그램 참가 가족들을 중심으로-이준기, 홍채홍pp. 273-299
원문 보기