본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

구조방정식 모형을 이용한 사회경제적 수준과 대사증후군의 관련성 분석

The Relationship between Socioeconomic Status and Metabolic Syndrome, Using Structural Equation Modelling

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타자연과학

초록

연구배경: 본 연구는 사회경제적 수준(socioeconomic status), 건강행동, 스트레스와 대사증후군 위험도(metabolic syndrome risks) 사이의 복잡한 관계망을 알아보고자 하였다. 수정된 일반적 개념모델(generalized conceptual model) 을 적용하여 이들 사이의 관련성을 설명하였고 구조방정식모델(structural equational modelling)을 분석에 이용하였다. 방법: 2004-2007년 사이 Korean Health Examinee Cohort (KOEX)에 등록한 24,210명(남자 8,242명, 여자 15,968명) 을 연구 대상으로 하였고 개별 면담을 통하여 사회경제적수준, 건강행동, 스트레스에 대한 자료를 수집하였다. 사회경제적 수준(교육, 소득, 직업), 건강행동(식이, 신체활동량, 흡연, 음주) 및 스트레스를 외생변수로 하였고, 수정된NCEP ATP-III 기준을 참고하여 대사증후군 위험도를 구하였고 이를 내생변수로 하였다. 결과: 모델적합도 검증 결과, 남자에서는 CFI=0.877, IFI= 0.877, TLI=0.757, RMSEA=0.055였고, 여자는 CFI=0.924, IFI=0.924, TLI=0.851, RMSEA=0.050으로 적합하였다. 남자는 사회경제적 수준(β=-0.08), 건강행동(β=-0.25) 및 스트레스(β=-0.25)가 MetS risk와 유의한 관련성이 있었으나, 여자에서는 SES (β=-0.25)만 관련성이 있었다(P<0.05). 결론: 일반적 개념모델은 건강행동, 스트레스 및 대사증후군 위험도에 미치는 사회경제적 수준의 복잡한 관련성을잘 설명하고 있다. 남자에서는 건강행동, 여자에서는 사회경제적 수준이 대사증후군 위험도와의 관련성이 가장 높았다. 또한 사회경제적 수준은 연령, 건강행동, 스트레스와도강한 관련성을 보였다.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the complexity of the relationships between socioeconomic status, health behaviors, stress and risks of metabolic syndrome. By applying structural equational modelling, modified generalized conceptual model had described the associations and interactions among them. Methods: 24,210 participants (8,242 men, 15,968 women) registered with the Korean Health Examinee Cohort (KOEX) between 2004 to 2008. This study collected data on the socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and stress through individual interviews. Socioeconomic status (education, house income, occupation), health behaviors (diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption) and stress level were defined as exogenous factors. Endogenous variables were risks of metabolic syndrome based on modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel-lll (NCEP ATP-lll, 2006). Results: According to model fitness test, these proposed model were acceptable in men, comparative fit index= 0.877, incremental fit Index=0.877, Tucker-Lewis index=0.757, root-mean-squared error associated=0.055. These were compatible also in women as comparative fit index=0.924, incremental fit index=0.924, Tucker-Lewis index=0.851, root-mean-squared error associated=0.050. There were sex difference related to risks of metabolic syndrome: in men socioeconomic status (β=-0.08), health behaviors (β=-0.25) and stress (β =-0.25) were relevant, but in women only socioeconomic status (β=-0.25) was relevant (P<0.05). Conclusions: A conceptual model properly explains how Socioeconomic status may influence on health behaviors, stress, and risks of metabolic syndrome. Health behaviors in men and socioeconomic status in women had the strongest associations with risks of metabolic syndrome. In addition, socioeconomic status was strongly associated with health behaviors, stress and age.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Tamashiro KL, "Metabolic syndrome: links to social stress and socioeconomic status", Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1231, pp.46~55 (2011)
  2. Story M, "Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches", Annu Rev Public Health, 29, pp.253~272 (2008)
  3. Sallis JF, "An ecological approach to creating active living communities", Annu Rev Public Health, 27, pp.297~322 (2006)
  4. Gruenewald TL, "History of socioeconomic disadvantage and allostatic load in later life", Soc Sci Med, 74, pp.75~83 (2012)
  5. Kondo N, "Income inequality, mortality, and self rated health: meta-analysis of multilevel studies", BMJ, 339, pp.b4471~ (2009)
  6. Steven HW, "Health promotion and disease prevention in clinical practice", pp.5~7 (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
  7. Braveman PA, "Socioeconomic status in health research: one size does not fit all", JAMA, 294, pp.2879~2888 (2005)
  8. Wilkinson RG, "The problems of relative deprivation:why some societies do better than others", Soc Sci Med, 65, pp.1965~1978 (2007)
  9. Baumann M, "Association of social and material deprivation with tobacco, alcohol and psychotropic use and gender: a population study", Int J Health Geogr, 6, pp.50~62 (2007)
  10. Matthews KA, "Association between socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome in women: testing the reserve capacity model", Health Psychol, 27, pp.576~583 (2008)
  11. Amiri P, "Factors affecting gender differences in the association between health-related quality of life and metabolic syndrome components: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study", PLoS One, 10(12), pp.e0143167~ (2015)
  12. Alberti KG, "Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity", Circulation, 120(16), pp.1640~1645 (2009)
  13. The Korean society for equity in health, "Methods in health inequalities measurement", pp.70~83 (2008), Hanul
  14. Kim DH, "Effect of Job and leisure time physical activity in the risk of colorectal cancer: a case-control study", pp.1997
  15. Lee CY, "Reliability and validity of PWI (psychosocial wellbeing index)", Korean J Prev Med, 29(2), pp.255~264 (1996)
  16. Yu JP, "Concept and understanding of structural equation modelling", pp.360~369 (2012), Hannarae publishers
  17. Lynch JW, "Socioeconomic position: Social epidemiology", pp.13~35 (2000), Oxford University Press
  18. Ford ES, "Low-risk lifestyle behaviors and all-cause mortality: findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III Mortality Study", Am J Public Health, 101(10), pp.1922~1929 (2011)
  19. Elwood P, "Healthy lifestyles reduce the incidence of chronic diseases and dementia: evidence from the Caerphilly cohort study", PLoS One, 8(12), pp.e81877~ (2013)
  20. Silventoinen K, "Educational inequalities in the metabolic syndrome and coronary heart disease among middle-aged men and women", Int J Epidemiol, 34(2), pp.327~334 (2005)
  21. Søltoft F, "The association of body mass index and health-related quality of life in the general population:data from the 2003 Health Survey of England", Qual Life Res, 18(10), pp.1293~1299 (2009)
  22. Chen YC, "Exploring the components of metabolic syndrome with respect to gender difference and its relationship to health-promoting lifestyle behaviour: a study in Taiwanese urban communities", J Clin Nurs, 19(21-22), pp.3031~3041 (2010)
  23. Lim H, "Sociodemographic disparities in the composition of metabolic syndrome components among adults in South Korea", Diabetes Care, 35(10), pp.2028~2035 (2012)
  24. Mi-Young Park, "Association of Leisure Time Physical Activity and Metabolic Syndrome over 40 Years", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 35(2), pp.65~73 (2014), 대한가정의학회
  25. 김성희, "40세 이상 성인에서 사회경제적 수준 및 건강행동과대사증후군의 관련성", Korean Journal of Health Promotion, 13(4), pp.125~132 (2013), 대한임상건강증진학회
  26. Ferguson TF, "Factor analysis of metabolic syndrome components in the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study: examination of factors by race-sex groups and across time", Ann Epidemiol, 20(3), pp.194~200 (2010)
  27. Judge TA, "When it comes to pay, do the thin win? The effect of weight on pay for men and women", J Appl Psychol, 96(1), pp.95~112 (2011)
  28. Bleich SN, "Health inequalities:trends, progress, and policy", Annu Rev Public Health, 33, pp.7~40 (2012)
  29. Sapolsky RM, "Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers", pp.9~12 (2004), Holt Paperbacks
  30. Hendrie GA, "Defining the complexity of childhood obesity and related behaviours within the family environment using structural equation modeling", Public Health Nutr, 15(1), pp.48~57 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)