본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Socioeconomic Status in Association with Metabolic Syndrome and Coronary Heart Disease Risk

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류가정의학

초록

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the association of metabolic syndrome (MS) coronary heart disease (CHD) with socioeconomic status (SES). Methods: The participants were 2,170 (631 men and 1,539 women), aged over 40 years who had visited for health screening from April to December in 2009. We classified them into three SES levels according to their education and income levels. MS was defined using the criteria of modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and CHD risk was defined using Framingham risk score (FRS) ≥ 10%. Results: High, middle, and low SES were 12.0%, 73.7%, and 14.3%, respectively. The prevalence of MS was 18.1%. For high,middle, and low SES, after adjusted covariates (age, drinking, smoking, and exercise), odds ratios for MS in men were 1.0,1.41 (confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 2.38; P > 0.05), and 1.50 (CI, 0.69 to 3.27; P > 0.05), respectively and in women were 1.0,1.74 (CI, 1.05 to 3.18; P < 0.05), and 2.81 (CI, 1.46 to 2.43; P < 0.05), respectively. The prevalence of FRS ≥ 10% was 33.5%(adjusted covariates were drinking, smoking, and exercise) and odds ratios for FRS ≥ 10% in men were 1.0, 2.86 (CI, 1.35to 6.08; P < 0.001), and 3.12 (CI, 1.94 to 5.00; P < 0.001), respectively and in women were 1.0, 3.24 (CI, 1.71 to 6.12; P < 0.001),and 8.80 (CI, 4.50 to 17.23; P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: There was an inverse relationship between SES and FRS ≥ 10% risk in men, and an inverse relationship between SES and both risk of MS and FRS ≥ 10% in women.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the association of metabolic syndrome (MS) coronary heart disease (CHD) with socioeconomic status (SES). Methods: The participants were 2,170 (631 men and 1,539 women), aged over 40 years who had visited for health screening from April to December in 2009. We classified them into three SES levels according to their education and income levels. MS was defined using the criteria of modified National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III and CHD risk was defined using Framingham risk score (FRS) ≥ 10%. Results: High, middle, and low SES were 12.0%, 73.7%, and 14.3%, respectively. The prevalence of MS was 18.1%. For high,middle, and low SES, after adjusted covariates (age, drinking, smoking, and exercise), odds ratios for MS in men were 1.0,1.41 (confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 2.38; P > 0.05), and 1.50 (CI, 0.69 to 3.27; P > 0.05), respectively and in women were 1.0,1.74 (CI, 1.05 to 3.18; P < 0.05), and 2.81 (CI, 1.46 to 2.43; P < 0.05), respectively. The prevalence of FRS ≥ 10% was 33.5%(adjusted covariates were drinking, smoking, and exercise) and odds ratios for FRS ≥ 10% in men were 1.0, 2.86 (CI, 1.35to 6.08; P < 0.001), and 3.12 (CI, 1.94 to 5.00; P < 0.001), respectively and in women were 1.0, 3.24 (CI, 1.71 to 6.12; P < 0.001),and 8.80 (CI, 4.50 to 17.23; P < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: There was an inverse relationship between SES and FRS ≥ 10% risk in men, and an inverse relationship between SES and both risk of MS and FRS ≥ 10% in women.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Mackenbach JP, "Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries", N Engl J Med, 358, pp.2468~2481 (2008)
  2. Kumari M, "Prospective study of social and other risk factors for incidence of type 2 diabetes in the Whitehall II study", Arch Intern Med, 164, pp.1873~1880 (2004)
  3. Wilkinson RG, "The problems of relative deprivation: why some societies do better than others", Soc Sci Med, 65, pp.1965~1978 (2007)
  4. The Korean Society for Equity in Health, "Methods in health inequalities measurement" (2008), Hanul Publishing Co.
  5. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, "Establish of new health plan 2010" (2006), Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs
  6. Chandola T, "Chronic stress at work and the metabolic syndrome: prospective study", BMJ, 332, pp.521~525 (2006)
  7. Chandola T, "Health selection in the Whitehall II study, UK", Soc Sci Med, 56, pp.2059~2072 (2003)
  8. Wannamethee SG, "Metabolic syndrome vs Framingham Risk Score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke, and type 2 diabetes mellitus", Arch Intern Med, 165, pp.2644~2650 (2005)
  9. Najarian RM, "Metabolic syndrome compared with type 2 diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Offspring Study", Arch Intern Med, 166, pp.106~111 (2006)
  10. Karam JH, "Type II diabetes and syndrome X: pathogenesis and glycemic management", Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am, 21, pp.329~350 (1992)
  11. Isomaa B, "Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome", Diabetes Care, 24, pp.683~689 (2001)
  12. Lakka HM, "The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men", JAMA, 288, pp.2709~2716 (2002)
  13. De Vogli R, "Unfairness and the social gradient of metabolic syndrome in the Whitehall II Study", J Psychosom Res, 63, pp.413~419 (2007)
  14. Franks P, "Including socioeconomic status in coronary heart disease risk estimation", Ann Fam Med, 8, pp.447~453 (2010)
  15. Loucks EB, "Life-course socioeconomic position and incidence of coronary heart disease: the Framingham Offspring Study", Am J Epidemiol, 169, pp.829~836 (2009)
  16. Karlamangla AS, "Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in cardiovascular risk in the United States, 2001-2006", Ann Epidemiol, 20, pp.617~628 (2006)
  17. Kim HR, "A study of differences in chronic diseases prevalence between socioeconomic classes", J Korean Soc Health Stat, 28, pp.56~56 (2003)
  18. Son M, "The relationship of social class and health behaviors with morbidity in Korea", Korean J Prev Med, 35, pp.57~64 (2002)
  19. Wamala SP, "Education and the metabolic syndrome in women", Diabetes Care, 22, pp.1999~2003 (1999)
  20. Dallongeville J, "Household income is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome in a sex-specific manner", Diabetes Care, 28, pp.409~415 (2005)
  21. Park MJ, "The relationship between socioeconomic status and metabolic syndrome among Korean adults", Korean J Obes, 15, pp.10~17 (2006)
  22. Park HS, "Prevalence and associated factors of metabolic syndrome among adults in primary care", Korean Soc Stud Obes, 12, pp.108~123 (2003)
  23. 최영호, "춘천 지역 중년 및 노인에서의 대사증후군의 유병률과 관련위험요인: 한림노년연구", Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 27(3), pp.190~200 (2006), 대한가정의학회
  24. Grundy SM, "Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association", National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Scientific Statement, 2005, pp.112, 2735~2752
  25. Wilson PW, "Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories", Circulation, 97, pp.1837~1847 (1998)
  26. Vagero D, "Health inequalities in Britain and Sweden", Lancet, 2, pp.35~36 (1989)
  27. Nelson M, "Low income, food, nutrition and health: strategies for improvemen" (1996), Department of Health
  28. Lidfeldt J, "Socio-demographic and psychosocial factors are associated with features of the metabolic syndrome: the Women’s Health in the Lund Area (WHILA) study", Diabetes Obes Metab, 5, pp.106~112 (2003)
  29. Wardle J, "Sex differences in the association of socioeconomic status with obesity", Am J Public Health, 92, pp.1299~1304 (2002)
  30. Drewnowski A, "Poverty and obesity: the role of energy density and energy costs", Am J Clin Nutr, 79, pp.6~16 (2004)
  31. Tamashiro KL, "Social stress: from rodents to primates", Front Neuroendocrinol, 26, pp.27~40 (2005)
  32. Neitzke U, "Intrauterine growth restriction and developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome: a critical appraisal", Microcirculation, 18, pp.304~311 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)