강원도와 제주도 관광서비스산업의 비교 실증분석
An Comparative Analysis on the Tourism Industry in Kwangwon and Jeju Province
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
It is well recognized that Kangwon and Jeju Province are the most popular tourist attractions in Korea. Both of Kangwon and Jeju Province have chosen tourism service sector which has grown rapidly during the last two decades as a leading and strategic industry, and have fostered the local tourism industry with large financial supports. To compare the tourism industries in both provinces would be expected to provide the basic data for the tourism policy. This paper has two purposes. The first is to suggest the new and simple method to derive a interregional input-output model from the national input-output table. Second, this paper aims to compare the tourism service industries in the two regions on the basis of the regional I-O model and its effects on the interregional economy. Empirical results are summarized as the followings. First imports coefficient, LQ index, and income multiplier in the tourism industry showed the similar magnitude between Kangwon and Jeju Province. Second the predicted value of the final demand in the tourism industry of Kangwon Province is expected to lead to 2,079 billion won in the regional output. 196 billion won in local tax revenue, and 1.9% point increase in financial self-sufficiency, while in the case of Jeju it might result in 8,877 billion won in the regional output, 617 billion won in local tax revenue, and 24.8% point increase in financial self-sufficiency.
Abstract
It is well recognized that Kangwon and Jeju Province are the most popular tourist attractions in Korea. Both of Kangwon and Jeju Province have chosen tourism service sector which has grown rapidly during the last two decades as a leading and strategic industry, and have fostered the local tourism industry with large financial supports. To compare the tourism industries in both provinces would be expected to provide the basic data for the tourism policy. This paper has two purposes. The first is to suggest the new and simple method to derive a interregional input-output model from the national input-output table. Second, this paper aims to compare the tourism service industries in the two regions on the basis of the regional I-O model and its effects on the interregional economy. Empirical results are summarized as the followings. First imports coefficient, LQ index, and income multiplier in the tourism industry showed the similar magnitude between Kangwon and Jeju Province. Second the predicted value of the final demand in the tourism industry of Kangwon Province is expected to lead to 2,079 billion won in the regional output. 196 billion won in local tax revenue, and 1.9% point increase in financial self-sufficiency, while in the case of Jeju it might result in 8,877 billion won in the regional output, 617 billion won in local tax revenue, and 24.8% point increase in financial self-sufficiency.
참고문헌 (13)
- 강원도, "강원통계연보", 강원도, ~ (1991)
- 강주훈, "강원도 의료관광산업의 경제적 파급효과 실증분석", 관광경영연구, 15(3), pp.1~22 (2011), 관광경영학회
- 성명재, "지방세 세목별 세수추계에 관한 연구" (2003), 한국조세연구원
- 윤지현, "동해안권 관광개발 활성화 방안 - 고성, 속초, 양양, 강릉지역을 중심으로 -", 관광경영연구, 12(3), pp.44~70 (2008), 관광경영학회
- 이재곤, "양양송이축제 활성화 방안", 관광경영연구, 10(4), pp.99~117 (2006)
- 정석중, "농촌관광 지원요소가 농촌관광개발과 농촌관광사업 성과에 미치는 영향", 관광경영연구, 14(4), pp.225~247 (2010), 관광경영학회
- 제주도, "제주통계연보", 제주도, ~ (1991)
- 한국은행, "산업연관표", 한국은행, ~ (2010)
- Fletcher, J. E., "Input-Output analysis and tourism impact studies", Annals of Tourism Research, 16(4), pp.514~529 (1989)
- Flegg A. T., "On the appropriate use of location quotients in generating regional input-output tables", Regional Studies, 29, pp.547~561 (1995)
- Miller Ronald E., "Input-Output Analysis. Second Ed" (2009), Cambridge Unversity Press
- Komei Sasaki, "Nonsurvey Methods for Projecting the Input-Output System at a Small Region Level: Two Alternative Approaches", Journal of Regional Science, 24, pp.35~42 (1984)
- Richardson Harry W, "Input-Output And Economic Base Multipliers: Looking Backward and Forward", Journal of Regional Science, 25, pp.607~661 (1985)
