성견에서 차단막/골이식재 복합체를 이용한 임플란트 주위 골유도재생 효과: 임상적, 방사선학적, 조직학적 평가
Local ridge augmentation using a composite of bone substitute and collagen membrane at peri-implant dehiscence defects: a clinical, radiographic and histological analyses
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a composite of bone substitute and collagen barrier membrane (bone patch) for local ridge augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects on the clinical efficacy and positional stability in dogs. Materials and methods : Implant placement and ridge augmentation procedure were performed at surgically created periimplant dehiscence defects in canine mandible (n=6). Four treatment modalities were randomly applied: i) bone patch group, ii) Guided bone regeneration (GBR) without pin fixation group (bone graft and collagen membrane), iii) GBR with pin fixation group, and iv) negative control group. After 12 weeks, clinical, micro-CT and histological analyses were performed. Results : Histologic analysis showed that bone patch group had similar results to GBR group and GBR with fixation group in terms of new bone formation. Micro-CT analysis revealed similar results to histologic analysis in terms of total volume maintenance. Operating time was shorter in bone patch group compared to GBR group and GBR with fixation groups. Conclusions : GBR using bone patch could simplify the ridge augmentation procedure with reduced operating time and equivalent biological performance compared to the conventional procedure.
Abstract
Objectives : The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a composite of bone substitute and collagen barrier membrane (bone patch) for local ridge augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects on the clinical efficacy and positional stability in dogs. Materials and methods : Implant placement and ridge augmentation procedure were performed at surgically created periimplant dehiscence defects in canine mandible (n=6). Four treatment modalities were randomly applied: i) bone patch group, ii) Guided bone regeneration (GBR) without pin fixation group (bone graft and collagen membrane), iii) GBR with pin fixation group, and iv) negative control group. After 12 weeks, clinical, micro-CT and histological analyses were performed. Results : Histologic analysis showed that bone patch group had similar results to GBR group and GBR with fixation group in terms of new bone formation. Micro-CT analysis revealed similar results to histologic analysis in terms of total volume maintenance. Operating time was shorter in bone patch group compared to GBR group and GBR with fixation groups. Conclusions : GBR using bone patch could simplify the ridge augmentation procedure with reduced operating time and equivalent biological performance compared to the conventional procedure.
참고문헌 (20)
- Pietrokovski J, "Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction", J Prosthet Dent, 17(1), pp.21~27 (1967)
- Araujo MG, "Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 32(2), pp.212~218 (2005)
- Van der Weijden F, "Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review", J Clin Periodontol, 36(12), pp.1048~1058 (2009)
- Hammerle CH, "Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.151~175 (1998)
- Jung RE, "Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 12-14 years", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24(10), pp.1065~1073 (2013)
- Hammerle CH, "Evidencebased knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets", Clin Oral Implants Res, 23(Suppl), pp.80~82 (2012)
- Pagni G, "Postextraction alveolar ridge preservation: biological basis and treatments", Int J Dent, 2012, pp.13~ (2012)
- Jung UW, "The efficacy of BMP-2 preloaded on bone substitute or hydrogel for bone regeneration at peri-implant defects in dogs", Clin Oral Implants Res, 26(12), pp.1456~1465 (2015)
- Thoma DS, "Bone augmentation at peri-implant dehiscence defects comparing a synthetic polyethylene glycol hydrogel matrix vs. standard guided bone regeneration techniques", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28(7), pp.e76~e83 (2017)
- Benic GI, "Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration", Periodontol 2000, 66(1), pp.13~40 (2014)
- Chasioti E, "Maintaining space in localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration with tenting screw technology", Quintessence Int, 44(10), pp.763~771 (2013)
- Mir-Mari J, "Influence of blinded wound closure on the volume stability of different GBR materials: an in vitro cone-beam computed tomographic examination", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27(2), pp.258~265 (2016)
- Wei H, "Stability of polydopamine and poly(DOPA) melanin-like films on the surface of polymer membranes under strongly acidic and alkaline conditions", Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 110, pp.22~28 (2013)
- Lee H, "Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings", Science, 318(5849), pp.426~430 (2007)
- Schophuizen CM, "Development of a living membrane comprising a functional human renal proximal tubule cell monolayer on polyethersulfone polymeric membrane", Acta Biomater, 14, pp.22~32 (2015)
- Cha JK, "Sequential healing of onlay bone grafts using combining biomaterials with cross-linked collagen in dogs.", Clin Oral Implants Res, 28(1), pp.76~85 (2017)
- Kirsch A, "Development and clinical application of titanium minipins for fixation of nonresorbable barrier membranes", Quintessence Int, 29(6), pp.368~381 (1998)
- Yoon SR, "De novo bone formation underneath the sinus membrane supported by a bone patch: a pilot experiment in rabbit sinus model", Clin Oral Implants Res (2016)
- Cortellini P, "Single minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative to treat multiple adjacent intra-bony defects: clinical outcomes and patient morbidity", J Clin Periodontol, 35(7), pp.605~613 (2008)
- Schepke U, "Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: Operating time and patient preference", J Prosthet Dent, 114(3), pp.403~406 (2015)