본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

근관치료의 근관장 측정에 관한 연구: 근관치료학 전공 교수 설문

A survey on working length determination of endodontic treatment

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preferred method of root canal length determination and the apical limit for canal instrumentation among endodontic teachers of dental school. A questionnaire on the preferred method of root canal length determination and the apical limit for canal instrumentation was designed and distributed to endodontic teachers of various dental schools. The response rate was 90%. The most preferred method of root canal length determination was Electronic apex locator (EAL)(89%). The most favoured apical limit for canal instrumentation was 0.5 to 1.0 mm short of the radiographic apex(78%). The most preferred method of using EAL was that the working length is taken at ‘APEX’ mark and then distracted 0.5mm from that length.(41%). When there is no agreement between radiographic measurement and EAL measurement, 74% of respondents chose the length of EAL measurement. The majority of endodontic teachers from Korean dental schools preferred EAL to radiograph method in determining root canal length.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the preferred method of root canal length determination and the apical limit for canal instrumentation among endodontic teachers of dental school. A questionnaire on the preferred method of root canal length determination and the apical limit for canal instrumentation was designed and distributed to endodontic teachers of various dental schools. The response rate was 90%. The most preferred method of root canal length determination was Electronic apex locator (EAL)(89%). The most favoured apical limit for canal instrumentation was 0.5 to 1.0 mm short of the radiographic apex(78%). The most preferred method of using EAL was that the working length is taken at ‘APEX’ mark and then distracted 0.5mm from that length.(41%). When there is no agreement between radiographic measurement and EAL measurement, 74% of respondents chose the length of EAL measurement. The majority of endodontic teachers from Korean dental schools preferred EAL to radiograph method in determining root canal length.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Ng YL, "A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health", Int Endod J, 44(7), pp.583~609 (2011)
  2. Schaeffer MA, "Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature", J Endod, 31(4), pp.271~274 (2005)
  3. Stoll R, "The influence of different factors on the survival of root canal fillings: a 10-year retrospective study", J Endod, 31(11), pp.783~790 (2005)
  4. Wu MK, "Apical terminus location of root canal treatment procedures", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 89(1), pp.99~103 (2000)
  5. Ricucci D, "Apical limit for root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 1. Literature review", Int Endod J, 31(6), pp.384~393 (1998)
  6. Ricucci D, "Apical limit for root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study", Int Endod J, 31(6), pp.394~409 (1998)
  7. "Glossary of endodontic terms" (2012)[URL]
  8. Grove C, "Why canals should be filled to the dentinocemental junction", J Am Dent Assoc, 17, pp.293~296 (1930)
  9. Dummer PM, "The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen", Int Endod J, 17(4), pp.192~198 (1984)
  10. Wrbas KT, "In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators", Int Endod J, 40(2), pp.133~138 (2007)
  11. European Society of Endodontology, "Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology", Int Endod J, 39(12), pp.921~930 (2006)
  12. Simon S, "Apical limit and working length in endodontics", Dent Update, 36(3), pp.146~ (2009)
  13. Palmer NO, "An investigation of current endodontic practice and training needs in primary care in the north west of England", Br Dent J, 206(11), pp.E22~ (2009)
  14. Stewart K, "Qualitative research in dentistry", Br Dent J, 204(5), pp.235~239 (2008)
  15. Ng YL, "Outcome of primary root canal treatment:systemic review of the literature-Part 2. Influence of clinical factors", Int Endod J, 41(1), pp.6~31 (2008)
  16. Jarad FD, "Working length determination in general dental practice: a randomised controlled trial", Br Dent J, 211(12), pp.595~598 (2011)
  17. Ravanshad S, "Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial", J Endod, 36(11), pp.1753~1756 (2010)
  18. Orafi I, "The use of radiography and the apex locator in endodontic treatment within the UK: a comparison between endodontic specialists and general dental practitioners", Int Endod J, 46(4), pp.355~364 (2013)
  19. Mohammed A, "Root canal working length determination and apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation", Endo (Lond Engl), 9(3), pp.161~168 (2015)
  20. Savani GM, "Current Trends in Endodontic Treatment by General Dental Practitioners: Report of a United States National Survey", J Endod, 40(5), pp.618~624 (2014)
  21. Orafi I, "The use of radiography and the apex locator in endodontic treatment within the UK: a comparison between endodontic specialists and general dental practitioners", Int Endod J, 46(4), pp.355~364 (2013)
  22. J. Morita Corp, "Root ZX operation instructions", pp.10~ (2004)
  23. Dummer PM, "The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen", Int Endod J, 17(4), pp.192~198 (1984)
  24. Piasecki L, "The Use of Micro-Computed Tomography to Determine the Accuracy of 2 Electronic Apex Locators and Anatomic Variations Affecting Their Precision", J Endod, 42(8), pp.1263~1267 (2016)
  25. Jung IY, "Comparison of the reliability of "0.5" and "APEX" mark measurements in two frequency-based electronic apex locators", J Endod, 37(1), pp.49~52 (2011)
  26. Siu C, "An in vivo comparison of the Root ZX II, the Apex NRG XFR, and Mini Apex Locator by using rotary nickeltitanium files", J Endod, 35(7), pp.962~965 (2009)
  27. Pascon EA, "An in vivo comparison of working length determination of two frequency-based electronic apex locators", Int Endod J, 42(11), pp.1026~1031 (2009)
  28. Gulabivala K, "Endodontics", pp.142~124 (2004), Mosby
  29. Martins JN, "Clinical efficacy of electronicapex locators:systematic review", J Endod, 40(6), pp.759~777 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)