본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

단일 임플란트 고정성 보철이 대합치 및 인접치에 미치는 병리적 영향에 대한 후향적 연구

Retrospective study on pathological effects of single implant-supported fixed prosthesis on antagonistic and adjacent teeth

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Purpose: This study evaluated the pathological effects of single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses on adjacent and antagonistic teeth and investigated the influence of systemic diseases, occlusal conditions, implant site, and patient sex.Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients who had received a single posterior implant and were followed for at least one year at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital. Clinical and radiographic assessments compared adjacent and antagonistic teeth at the implant site (ex-perimental group) with the corresponding contralateral teeth (control group). Parameters included tooth cracks, cusp fractures, alveolar bone status, treatment history, and occlusal contact assessed using the Shimstock test. Associations with systemic diseases, occlusal contact, sex, and implant position were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test with a significance level of 0.05. Results: The distal adjacent tooth at the implant site showed significantly higher mobility than the control group (p<0.05). In patients without unilateral mastication, periapical lesions in antagonistic teeth (p<0.05) and cracks in adjacent teeth (p<0.05) were more frequent. Diabetic patients demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of alveolar bone loss and treatment history in both adjacent and antagonistic teeth (p<0.05). When no occlusal contact was present on the implant-antagonistic tooth, less alveolar bone loss was observed (p<0.05), whereas cusp fractures in adjacent teeth were more common. Male patients showed a higher frequency of cusp fractures and cracks in adjacent teeth (p<0.05). Conclusion: Single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses can induce pathological changes in adjacent and antagonistic teeth. Implant treatment planning should consider systemic health, occlusal dynamics, sex-related differences, and long-term maintenance. (J Korean Dent Assoc 2025; 63(12): 381-390)

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the pathological effects of single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses on adjacent and antagonistic teeth and investigated the influence of systemic diseases, occlusal conditions, implant site, and patient sex.Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 100 patients who had received a single posterior implant and were followed for at least one year at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital. Clinical and radiographic assessments compared adjacent and antagonistic teeth at the implant site (ex-perimental group) with the corresponding contralateral teeth (control group). Parameters included tooth cracks, cusp fractures, alveolar bone status, treatment history, and occlusal contact assessed using the Shimstock test. Associations with systemic diseases, occlusal contact, sex, and implant position were also analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test with a significance level of 0.05. Results: The distal adjacent tooth at the implant site showed significantly higher mobility than the control group (p<0.05). In patients without unilateral mastication, periapical lesions in antagonistic teeth (p<0.05) and cracks in adjacent teeth (p<0.05) were more frequent. Diabetic patients demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of alveolar bone loss and treatment history in both adjacent and antagonistic teeth (p<0.05). When no occlusal contact was present on the implant-antagonistic tooth, less alveolar bone loss was observed (p<0.05), whereas cusp fractures in adjacent teeth were more common. Male patients showed a higher frequency of cusp fractures and cracks in adjacent teeth (p<0.05). Conclusion: Single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses can induce pathological changes in adjacent and antagonistic teeth. Implant treatment planning should consider systemic health, occlusal dynamics, sex-related differences, and long-term maintenance. (J Korean Dent Assoc 2025; 63(12): 381-390)

관련 논문AI추천

Analysis of factors affecting the long-term status of adjacent and antagonistic teeth in relation to dental implants서조영, Hye Rin Kim, Jae Mok Lee, Yong-Gun Kim치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2022 · 제46권 제1호Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors김용건, 박수연, 서조영, 이두형, 이재목대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2021 · 제51권 제2호Complications of Teeth and Implants Adjacent to Canine Implants: A Retrospective Study김영택, 윤준호, 이보아대한구강악안면임플란트학회 · 대한구강악안면임플란트학회지2022 · 제26권 제2호Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis권혜인, 김영택, 이재홍, 최성호대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2016 · 제46권 제6호Factors influencing proximal contact loss between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective studyJong-Hee Kim, Yang-Jin Yi대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2025 · 제51권 제1호하악구치 임플란트 지지 단일수복에서 근심 캔틸레버가 임플란트 합병증에 미치는 영향김명래, 김선종, 신혜승대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2009 · 제35권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)