본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Analysis of factors affecting the long-term status of adjacent and antagonistic teeth in relation to dental implants

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The aim of this study is to investigate factors that affect the prognosis of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after an implant restoration. In total, 102 implant placement sites of 91 patients who underwent implant placement in Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 68.27 months, whereas the maximum was 136 months. The cause of the previous extraction and implant-related factors were investigated. Radiographic evaluations were performed after the surgery and prosthetic treatment. Extraction and other treatments, including restorative or endodontic treatment of the antagonistic and adjacent teeth, were analyzed during the follow-up period. The chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze which factors could affect the implant prognosis. Of the studied antagonistic teeth, a total of 4.9% were treated and 12.7% were extracted. Furthermore, of the studied adjacent teeth, a total of 2.9% underwent treatment and 3.9% were extracted. The causes of previous extractions and types of restoration materials showed a significant difference in the treatment rate of adjacent teeth (p=0.05). Furthermore, implant surface types showed a significant difference in the extraction rate of antagonistic teeth (p=0.05). In conclusion, it can be suggested that the cause of the previous extraction and the material of the implant restoration may affect the prognosis of the teeth adjacent to the implant. Moreover, a specific type of implant surface may be a risk factor for antagonistic teeth.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate factors that affect the prognosis of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after an implant restoration. In total, 102 implant placement sites of 91 patients who underwent implant placement in Kyungpook National University Dental Hospital were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 68.27 months, whereas the maximum was 136 months. The cause of the previous extraction and implant-related factors were investigated. Radiographic evaluations were performed after the surgery and prosthetic treatment. Extraction and other treatments, including restorative or endodontic treatment of the antagonistic and adjacent teeth, were analyzed during the follow-up period. The chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to analyze which factors could affect the implant prognosis. Of the studied antagonistic teeth, a total of 4.9% were treated and 12.7% were extracted. Furthermore, of the studied adjacent teeth, a total of 2.9% underwent treatment and 3.9% were extracted. The causes of previous extractions and types of restoration materials showed a significant difference in the treatment rate of adjacent teeth (p=0.05). Furthermore, implant surface types showed a significant difference in the extraction rate of antagonistic teeth (p=0.05). In conclusion, it can be suggested that the cause of the previous extraction and the material of the implant restoration may affect the prognosis of the teeth adjacent to the implant. Moreover, a specific type of implant surface may be a risk factor for antagonistic teeth.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)[DOI]
  2. Jemt T, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients : a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 4, pp.211~217 (1989)
  3. Buser D, "Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration : 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions", Periodontol 2000, 73, pp.7~21 (2017)[DOI]
  4. Duqum I, "The effect of single tooth implant restorations on the survival, morbidity, pulpal, and periapical health of adjacent teeth : a chart review", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 20, pp.479~482 (2018)[DOI]
  5. Priest G, "Single-tooth implants and their role in preserving remaining teeth : a 10-year survival study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.181~188 (1999)
  6. Krennmair G, "Status of teeth adjacent to single-tooth implants", Int J Prosthodont, 16, pp.524~528 (2003)
  7. Misch CE, "Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period : a retrospective report", J Periodontol, 79, pp.2378~2382 (2008)[DOI]
  8. Urdaneta RA, "Factors associated with crestal bone gain on single-tooth locking-taper implants : the effect of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 26, pp.1063~1078 (2011)
  9. Urdaneta RA, "The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants", Clin Oral Implants Res, 25, pp.e179~e188 (2014)[DOI]
  10. 박수연, "Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors", Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science, 51(2), pp.135~143 (2021), 대한치주과학회[DOI]
  11. Yamazaki S, "A retrospective comparative 8-year study of cumulative complications in teeth adjacent to both natural and implantsupported fixed partial dentures", Int J Prosthodont, 26, pp.260~264 (2013)[DOI]
  12. Ivanoff CJ, "Influence of variations in implant diameters : a 3-to 5-year retrospective clinical report", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.173~180 (1999)
  13. Young DA, "The American Dental Association Caries Classification System for clinical practice : a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs", J Am Dent Assoc, 146, pp.79~86 (2015)[DOI]
  14. Smith RB, "Influence of implant-tooth proximity on incidence of caries in teeth adjacent to implants in molar sites : a retrospective radiographic analysis of 300 consecutive implants", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 41, pp.e1~e5 (2020)
  15. Suzuki S, "Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel", J Am Dent Assoc, 127, pp.74~80 (1996)[DOI]
  16. Yip KH, "Differential wear of teeth and restorative materials : clinical implications", Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp.350~356 (2004)
  17. Martin Rosentritt, "Influence of zirconia and lithium disilicate tooth- or implantsupported crowns on wear of antagonistic and adjacent teeth", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 12(1), pp.1~8 (2020), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  18. Hudson JD, "Enamel wear caused by three different restorative materials", J Prosthet Dent, 74, pp.647~654 (1995)[DOI]
  19. Ramp MH, "Evaluation of wear : enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.523~530 (1997)[DOI]
  20. Kwon M, "Two-body wear comparison of zirconia crown, gold crown, and enamel against zirconia", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 47, pp.21~28 (2015)[DOI]
  21. Mundhe K, "Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.358~363 (2015)[DOI]
  22. Machtei EE, "Axial relationship between dental implants and teeth", implants : a radiographic study, 2014, pp.40, 425~431

관련 논문AI추천

Long-term outcomes of adjacent and antagonistic teeth after implant restoration: a focus on patient-related factors김용건, 박수연, 서조영, 이두형, 이재목대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2021 · 제51권 제2호Factors influencing proximal contact loss between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent natural teeth: a retrospective studyJong-Hee Kim, Yang-Jin Yi대한구강악안면외과학회 · 대한구강악안면외과학회지2025 · 제51권 제1호Prognosis of implants placed simultaneously with periodontal surgery of the adjacent toothHan-Chang Yu, Young-Kyun Kim치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2020 · 제44권 제2호Comparison of marginal bone loss of dental implants and adjacent teeth in the same interproximal unit: a retrospective study with follow-up over 2 years after prosthesis delivery정성념, Do-Hyung Kim, Ji-Hoo Han치의학연구원 · Oral Biology Research2022 · 제46권 제1호단일 임플란트 고정성 보철이 대합치 및 인접치에 미치는 병리적 영향에 대한 후향적 연구김진우, 마득상, 박세희, 육영진, 조경모대한치과의사협회 · 대한치과의사협회지2025 · 제63권 제12호Association between dental implants in the posterior region and traumatic occlusion in the adjacent premolars: a long-term follow-up clinical and radiographic analysis권혜인, 김영택, 이재홍, 최성호대한치주과학회 · Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science2016 · 제46권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)