하악구치 임플란트 지지 단일수복에서 근심 캔틸레버가 임플란트 합병증에 미치는 영향
COMPLICATIONS OF THE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED POSTERIOR MANDIBULAR SINGLE RESTORATIONS WITH MESIAL CANTILEVER
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This retrospective study was performed to analyze the relationship between complications of the posterior mandibular single crowns and distance from the adjacent teeth to the implant. Subjects and Methods: Of the patients who presented Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital & Yonsei University Dental Hospital with missing of the posterior mandibular molar and restored with implant-supported 18 Single crowns between 1996 thru 2007, 115 patients had been followed after crown delivery. The subjects were divided into complication-followed group and a control without any problems. The distance from the most distal tooth to the implant were measured. The prosthetic & biologic complications were reviewed by the cantilever distance and analyzed by abutment type, age & gender statistically using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Inc., USA). Results and Conclusion The results were as follows; 1) The posterior mandibular single crown with cantilever showed higher incidence of follow-up complications upon logistic analysis (p<0.05). 2) The prosthetic and biologic complications are related with the cantilever distance with 2.1 odds ratio and 3.39 cut-off value of specificity & sensitivity by SPSS 12.0. 3) The complications are neither significant in abutment types nor age & gender.
Abstract
Purpose: This retrospective study was performed to analyze the relationship between complications of the posterior mandibular single crowns and distance from the adjacent teeth to the implant. Subjects and Methods: Of the patients who presented Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital & Yonsei University Dental Hospital with missing of the posterior mandibular molar and restored with implant-supported 18 Single crowns between 1996 thru 2007, 115 patients had been followed after crown delivery. The subjects were divided into complication-followed group and a control without any problems. The distance from the most distal tooth to the implant were measured. The prosthetic & biologic complications were reviewed by the cantilever distance and analyzed by abutment type, age & gender statistically using SAS version 9.1 (SAS Inc., USA). Results and Conclusion The results were as follows; 1) The posterior mandibular single crown with cantilever showed higher incidence of follow-up complications upon logistic analysis (p<0.05). 2) The prosthetic and biologic complications are related with the cantilever distance with 2.1 odds ratio and 3.39 cut-off value of specificity & sensitivity by SPSS 12.0. 3) The complications are neither significant in abutment types nor age & gender.
참고문헌 (19)
- Schwartz NL, "Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life span and causes for loss of serviceability", J Am Dent Assoc, 81, pp.1395~1401 (1970)
- Walton JN, "A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures, length of service and reasons for replacement", J Prosthet Dent, 56, pp.416~421 (1986)
- Dykema RW, "Johnston’s Modern Practice in Crownand Bridge Prosthodontics", pp.24~36 (1986), W.B. Saunders Co.
- Malevez C, "Marginal bone levels at Branemark system implants used for single tooth restoration: the influence of implant design and anatomical region", Clin Oral Implants Res, 7, pp.162~169 (1996)
- Sullivan DY, "Wide implants for wide teeth", Dent Econ, 84, pp.82~83 (1994)
- Rangert B, "Bending overlad and fixture facture: a retrospective clinical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.326~334 (1995)
- Jemt T, "Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual check up", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.40~44 (1992)
- Quirynen M, "Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system", Clin Oral Implants Res, 3, pp.104~111 (1992)
- Naert I, "A six year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism", J Prosthet Dent, 67, pp.236~245 (1992)
- Rangert B, "Bending overload and implant failure: a retrospective clinical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.40~44 (1995)
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10(6), pp.387~416 (1981)
- Adell R, "Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 15(1), pp.39~52 (1986)
- Norton MR, "An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design", Clin Oral Implants Res, 8(4), pp.290~298 (1997)
- Mo ¨llersten L, "Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test", J Prosthet Dent, 78(6), pp.582~591 (1997)
- Salama H, "The interproximal height of bone: a guidepost to predictable aesthetic strategies and soft tissue contours in anterior tooth replacement, Pr", ~
- Merz BR, "Mechanics of the implantabutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 15, pp.519~526 (2000)
- Khraisat A, "Fatigue resistance of two implant", abutment joint designs, 2002, pp.88, 604~610
- Maeda Y, "In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant?abutment connections: a short communication", Pact Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 10(9), pp.1131~1141 (1998)
- Br¨agger U, "Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function", Clin Oral Implants Res, 12(1), pp.26~34 (2001), Lang NP