제국일본의 화공(華工)과 식민당국의 화공정책 ― 식민지 조선과 타이완을 중심으로
Chinese Laborers in the Japanese Empire, and the Colonial Policies that Regulated Them: The Situation in Colonial Korea and Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After the Sino-Japanese War, human migration in East Asia began to dramatically increase. This included Japanese migration to Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, Korean migration to Manchuria and Japan, and Chinese migration to Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Such mass migration within East Asia triggered the overall transformation of the region in political, economic, and cultural terms. This paper focuses primarily on Chinese migration, which, while constituting a much smaller part of this mass migration than that of Japanese or Koreans, nonetheless continued with little interruption during this time of great political upheaval, which included port opening, wars, and colonization. This was due to the fact that Chinese migration in East Asia was largely economically motivated, unlike Japanese and Korean migration, which was often caused by political factors. The majority of all overseas Chinese, commonly called huaqiao, were laborers, or huagong, and this was the case in East Asia too. In the 1920s in particular, the vast majority of the Chinese living in colonial Korea and Taiwan were laborers, and they were consistently absorbed into the Japanese empire, which was linked to the growth of capitalism in Japan, Japan’s efficient colonial rule, and the migration of Japanese and Korean laborers in East Asia. Consequently, Japanese colonial authorities had no choice but to take a serious view of the problem of Chinese laborers, especially regarding policies pertaining to their employment, public security, and custom. This paper attempts to shed new light on the meanings of port opening, war, and colonialism in East Asia by examining the motivation, nature, and organization of migrant Chinese laborers in colonial Korea and Taiwan as well as the policies Japan drew up to regulate them within their colonial purview.
Abstract
After the Sino-Japanese War, human migration in East Asia began to dramatically increase. This included Japanese migration to Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, Korean migration to Manchuria and Japan, and Chinese migration to Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Such mass migration within East Asia triggered the overall transformation of the region in political, economic, and cultural terms. This paper focuses primarily on Chinese migration, which, while constituting a much smaller part of this mass migration than that of Japanese or Koreans, nonetheless continued with little interruption during this time of great political upheaval, which included port opening, wars, and colonization. This was due to the fact that Chinese migration in East Asia was largely economically motivated, unlike Japanese and Korean migration, which was often caused by political factors. The majority of all overseas Chinese, commonly called huaqiao, were laborers, or huagong, and this was the case in East Asia too. In the 1920s in particular, the vast majority of the Chinese living in colonial Korea and Taiwan were laborers, and they were consistently absorbed into the Japanese empire, which was linked to the growth of capitalism in Japan, Japan’s efficient colonial rule, and the migration of Japanese and Korean laborers in East Asia. Consequently, Japanese colonial authorities had no choice but to take a serious view of the problem of Chinese laborers, especially regarding policies pertaining to their employment, public security, and custom. This paper attempts to shed new light on the meanings of port opening, war, and colonialism in East Asia by examining the motivation, nature, and organization of migrant Chinese laborers in colonial Korea and Taiwan as well as the policies Japan drew up to regulate them within their colonial purview.
참고문헌 (34)
- 이옥련, "인천 화교사회의 형성과 전개" (2008), 인천문화재단
- 최승현, "화교의 역사 생존의 역사" (2007), 화약고
- 전우용, "한국 근대의 華僑 문제", 韓國史學報, 15, pp.13~412 (2003), 고려사학회
- 이시카와 료타(石川亮太), "동순태와 인천 화교무역", 플랫폼, 9통권 : 5 (2007)
- 이창호, "한국 화교(華僑)의 사회적 지위와 관계의 공간: 인천 화교의 관시(關係)와 후이(會)를 중심으로", 비교문화연구, 14(1), pp.75~122 (2008), 비교문화연구소
- 김경국, "한국의 화교연구 배경 및 동향 분석", 중국인문과학, 26, pp.29~516 (2003), 중국인문학회
- 배성준, "일제하 경성지역 공업 연구", 박사, pp.1998
- 정혜중, "開港期 仁川 華商 네트워크와 華僑 정착의 특징", 중국근현대사연구, (36), pp.1~28 (2007), 중국근현대사학회
- 장수현, "한국화교의 사회적 위상과 문화적 정체성", 국제인권법, (4) (2001)
- 류제헌, "仁川市 華僑街의 盛衰過程: 1884-1992", 문화역사지리, 18(1), pp.11~37 (2006), 한국문화역사지리학회
- "「중국인의 직업침탈」, 『동아일보』, 1924. 9. 22", ~ (1924)
- 王正廷, "朝鮮華僑槪況" (1930)
- "南京國民政府 外交部公報" (1990), 江蘇古籍出版社
- 楊昭全, "朝鮮華僑史" (1991), 中國華僑出版公司
- 吳文星, "日據時期在台「華僑」硏究" (1991), 學生書局
- 許雪姬, "台灣中華總會館成立前的‘台灣華僑’ 1895-1927", 中央硏究院近代史硏究所集刊, 20 (1991)
- 劉德增, "闖關東―2500萬山東移民的歷史與傳說" (2008), 山東人民出版社
- 朝鮮總督府警務局, "高等警察報 3號", ~ (1934)
- 京畿道警察部, "京畿道警察例規聚" (1927), 朝鮮警察協會京城支部
- 朝鮮警察協會, "朝鮮警察法令聚 中卷 1"
- 京畿道警察部, "京畿道警察例規聚" (1927), 朝鮮警察協會京城支部
- "『外事警察關係雜纂』 K.3.6.0.1, 外交史料館(外務省) 所藏資料, 1937", ~ (1937)
- 松尾弘, "台灣の支那人勞動者", 南支南洋硏究, (3) (1937)
- 台灣中華總會館, "台灣中華總會館十年紀念特刊" (1936), 台灣新民報社
- 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮に於ける支那人(調査資料 第7輯)" (1924)
- 小田內通敏, "朝鮮に於ける支那人の經濟的勢力" (1925), 東洋硏究會
- 朝鮮總督府警務局, "昭和二年 治安狀況" (1927)
- "朝鮮曆年華僑人口調査統計", 朝鮮總領事館, 4(8) (1931)
- 安井三吉, "帝國日本と華僑―日本⋅台灣⋅朝鮮" (2005), 靑木書店
- 山邊健太朗, "現代史資料(21) 台灣" (1971), みすず書局
- 岡本達朗, "聞書水俣民衆史5植民地は天國1だつた" (1990), 草風館
- 堀內稔, "赴戰江水電工事と中國人勞動者", むくげ通信, 183 (2000)
- 讀賣新聞, "「中華義莊, 假の墓から永眠の地へ」, 2008. 2. 24", ~ (2008)
- H. F. MacNari, "Chinese Emigration", The Chinese Social and Political Science Review (1923)
