본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소비자의 심리적 일탈, 라이선싱 효과

Licensing Effect, the Consumers’ Psychological Deviance

0

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

현대 사회에서 많은 소비자들은 종종 자신도 자각하지 못하는 상태에서 비합리적인 소비행동을 일삼기도 한다. 이러한 비합리성 역시 소비자행동의 중요한 일부분이며, 많은 연구자들에 의해 다양한 연구가 이루어져 왔다. 특정활동에 있어서 노력을 기울이게 되면, 이후의 선택에 있어서 좀 더 쾌락적인 선택을 하기 쉬워진다는 Khan and Dhar(2006)의 연구에서는 이러한 현상을 라이선싱 효과(licensing effect)라 명명하고, 이에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 다양한 실험들을 통해 분석하였다. 본 연구에서는 선행연구에서 제시한 이슈의 폭을 확대하기 위한 연구문제를 설정하고 이를 실증적으로 고찰하고 있다. 주요 연구결과를 설명하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 라이선싱 효과는 다양한 상황에서 존재한다는 것을 증명하면서 특정 과업의 실행에서 노력수준이 높은 집단이 그렇지 않은 집단보다 높은 자아개념을 보이고 이에 따른 일탈행위를할 확률이 높다는 결과를 보여주었다. 둘째, 노력수준과 자기통제 수준이 라이선싱 효과에서 상호작용 효과를 나타낸다는 것을 제시하였다. 노력수준이높은 사람이 자기통제 수준이 낮을 때, 노력수준이 낮은 사람이 자기통제 수준이 높을 때 일탈행위에 대한 의도가높게 나타난다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다. 실험 결과에 의하면, 소비자들은 일반적으로 과업을 완수한 후에는 비합리적 소비를 해도 된다는 심리적 면죄부를 가져서 자신의 목표 추구에 있어서 바람직하지 않았던 제품의 구매나 서비스의 이용을 하게 되는 경향이 있고이러한 경향이 소비자의 노력수준과 자기통제 수준에 따라 달라질 것이라는 결론을 내릴 수 있었다. 본 연구에서는이러한 연구결과에 대하여 소비자행동 관점에서 연구의 이론적 및 실무적 시사점을 검토하고 향후 연구방향을 제시하였다.

Abstract

Most of researches about consumer choice focus on the decision processes by which consumers choose among a set of alternatives, independent of the way they arrive at the choice. In contrast to this focus on isolated, or “single shot” choices, consumers in the real world often make a series of decisions in which one choice follows another. Preferences among alternatives can be affected by consumers’ prior actions. Prior decisions and actions can serve as a license to choose options that are inconsistent with the salient self. Licensing can operate by committing to an affirmative action, which reduces the feeling of guilty associated with the purchase of relative luxuries. Studies demonstrate the proposed licensing effect of a prior commitment to an affirmative action on subsequent choice. The purpose of this study is to examine the customer response in the licensing situation. To verify how customers decide to buy hedonic products a 2(Type of goal : health, learning) X 2(level of effort : high, low) X 2(level of self-control : high, low)factorial design experiment was conducted with undergraduate students at university at Korea as part of their course requirement. Several factors including self-concept, self-control and purchase intention were selected from prior studies and manipulations for each scenario were checked. Due to multiple dependent variables(self-concept, purchase intention), we used a MANCOVA to test four hypotheses developed. The results show that type of goal has no effect on self-concept(learning: mean=4.75 /health : mean=4.74, p=.643) and purchase intention(learning : mean=4.60 / health :mean=4.50, p=.321). According to this result, we assumed that licensing effect could occur in various situations. The main effect of level of effort was significant for two dependent variables (self-concept : F=31.477, p<0.01 / purchase intention : F=40.130, p<0.01) in support of H1 and H2. Interaction effects between level of effort and self-control for H3 and H4 on two dependent variables were significant(self-concept : F=17.533, p<0.01 / purchase intention :F=13.472, p<0.01). The research results show that consumers who study hard or work hard are more preferring to buy hedonic goods than people do not do like that in various situations. Individuals who pay more effort to achieve their goals are more likely to buy hedonic goods. Ironically, people who think they have high level of self-control are more likely to make indulgent choice when they pay a lot of effort for their objectives. Furthermore, there are interaction effects between level of effort and self-control. Study on licensing effect in consumer choice is helpful for understanding consumers’ irrational behaviors. For marketers, take advantage of human irrationality is one of the means of sales promotion. Although this way maybe inconsistent with the ethical management, from the perspective of consumers, understanding licensing effect could be helpful because it make them to try to avoid bad choices. The fact that data were obtained from only a specific segment of the population by experiment is one of limitation in this research. Also, selection of the goal or product type for the research did not allow alternative options that differed significantly in terms of licensing effect. Therefore, expanded research targeted consumers who really in licensing condition with various situations need to be conducted for accuracy and generalization. Additionally, for deeper understanding of licensing effect of consumers, qualitative research approach is needed.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. 권미화, "청소년 소비자의 소비행동이 합리성에 영향을 미치는 요인", 한국가정관리학회지, 18(2), pp.175~190 (2000)
  2. 김기옥, "현대 소비자의 소비생활복지: 자기결정성이론의 적용", 소비자학연구, 18(4), pp.47~65 (2007), 한국소비자학회
  3. 김난도, "소비합리성의 개념에 대한 연구", 소비자학연구, 14(3), pp.5~106 (2003), 한국소비자학회
  4. 김남국, "일탈허가권과 마케팅", Dong-A Business Review, 47(12), pp.67~ (2009)
  5. 김정숙, "한· 일 여자대학생들의 보상소비성향", 대한가정학회지, 40(12), pp.31~48 (2002), 대한가정학회
  6. 문지현, "소주, 소통과 일탈의 즐거움", 석사, pp.2010
  7. 송인숙, "도시 여성소비자의 보상구매행동", 생활과학연구, 13(1), pp.5~25 (1993)
  8. 심춘섭, "합리적인 소비생활에 관한 연구: 전라남도지방의 농촌주부를 대상으로", 서울대학교 가정대학 논문집, (6) (1969)
  9. 양세정, "남녀 대학생의 보상소비성향에 관한 연구", 한국가정관리학회지, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2008), 한국가정관리학회
  10. 이경진, "기혼여성의 보상구매행동에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
  11. 이진, "개인의 목표 성취와 삶의 만족도: 자기 효능감의 역할을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
  12. 홍준희, "스포츠 상황에서 자기조절 초점과 목표추구 행동간의 관계", 박사, pp.2001
  13. Ajzen, Icek, "The Theory of Planned Behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp.179~211 (1991)
  14. Alexis, Marcus, "Organization Decision Making" (1967), Prentice-Hall, Inc
  15. Ames, Carole, "Classroom: Goal, Structures, and Student Motivation", Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, pp.261~271 (1992)
  16. Baumeister, Roy F., "Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), pp.670~676 (2002)
  17. Bazerman, Max H., "Negotiation With Yourself and Losing: Understanding and Managing Conflicting Internal Preferences", Academy of Management Reviews, 23, pp.225~241 (1998)
  18. Brim, Oliver. G., "Personality and Decision Processes: Studies in the Social Psychology of Thinking" (1962), Stanford University Press
  19. Chakravarti, Dipankar, "Product Category Perceptions, Elaborative Processing and Brand Name Extension Strategies", Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), pp.910~916 (1990)
  20. Dhar, Ravi, "Consumer Choice Between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods", Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), pp.60~71 (2000)
  21. Dhar, Ravi, "Marketing Complementary Choices in Consumption Episodes: Highlighting Versus Balancing", Journal of Marketing Research, 36, pp.29~44 (1999)
  22. Dweck, Carol S., "A Social-Cognitive Approach to Motivation and Personality", Psychological Review, 95, pp.256~273 (1988)
  23. Ferster, G, "Patterns of antenatal care, perinatal mortality, and birth-weight in three consultant obstetric units", The Lancet, 308(2), pp.727~729 (1976)
  24. Fishbach, Ayelet, "Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice", Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), pp.370~377 (2005)
  25. Heatherton, Todd F., "Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring State Self-Esteem", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, pp.895~910 (1991)
  26. Holbrook. Morris B., "The Experiential Aspect of Consumption: Consumer Fantasies, Feelings, and Fun", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.132~140 (1982)
  27. James, William, "Principles of Psychology" (1890), University of Chicago Press
  28. Kanfer, Frederick. H, "Self-control and tolerance of noxious stimulation", Psychological Reports, 18(1), pp.79~85 (1966)
  29. Kanfer, Ruth, "Depress, Interpersonal Standard Setting, and Judgments of Self-Efficacy", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, pp.319~329 (1983)
  30. Khan, Uzma, "Navigating Between Virtues and Vices: Moderators of Decisions Involving Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Choices", Advances in Consumer Research, pp.358~361 (2004)
  31. Khan, Uzma, "Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice", Journal of Marketing Research, pp.259~266 (2006)
  32. Kivetz, Ran, "Earning the Right to Indulge: Efforts as Determinant of Consumer Preferences Toward Frequency Program Rewards", Journal of Marketing Research, 39, pp.155~170 (2002)
  33. Locke, Edwin A., "The Determinants of Goal Commitment", Academy of Management Review, 13, pp.23~29 (1988)
  34. Logue, A. W, "Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today" (1995), Prentice Hall
  35. Noveemsky, Nathan, "Goal Fulfillment and Goal Targets in Sequential Choice", Journal of Consumer Research, 32, pp.396~404 (2005)
  36. Noveemsky, Nathan, "Reference Fluency in Consumer Choice", Journal of Marketing Research, 44, pp.347~356 (2007)
  37. Patterson, Gerald R., "Performance Models for Antisocial Boys", American Psychologist, 41(4), pp.432~444 (1973)
  38. Pervin, Lawrence A., "Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology" (1989), Erlbaum
  39. Pervin, Lawrence A., "The Science of Personality" (1996), John Wiley and Sons
  40. Rodgers, Shelly, "The effect of Sponsor Relevance on Consumer Reactions to Internet Sponsorships", Journal of Advertising, 32(4), pp.67~76 (2004)
  41. Rook, Dennis W., "The Buying Impulse", Journal of Consumer Research, 14(2), pp.189~199 (1987)
  42. Tangney, June P, "High Self-Control Predicts Good Adjustment, Less Pathology, Better Grades, and Interpersonal Success", Journal of Personality, 72(2), pp.271~324 (2004)
  43. Thompson, Craig J., "The Lived Meaning of Free Choice: An Existential-Phenomenologial Description of Everyday Consumer Experiences of Contemporary Married Women", Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), pp.346~361 (1990)
  44. Vohs, Kathleen D., "Handbook of Self Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications" (2004), Guilford
  45. Weiner, Bernard, "An Attribution Theory of Motivation and Emotion, In Springer Series in Social Psychology" (1986), Prentice-Hall
  46. Wilcox. Keith, "Vicarious Goal Fulfillment: When the Mere Presence of a Healthy Option Leads to an Ironically Indulgent Decision", Journal of Consumer Research, 9, pp.380~393 (2009)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)