百年五四 — 5⋅4운동 백 년의 회고와 현장
May Fourth Movement 100 Years: Reflection and Ideal in its Historic Narratives and Discourses
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The May Fourth Movement in 1919 was the most important researching subject that infiltrated modern Chinese history. In particular, the May Fourth Movement developed into a comprehensive social and political reform movement covering the entire Chinese traditional culture. Based on The new cultural movement and its ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' passed on its renaissance torch to the May Fourth Movement. The centered on young intellectuals and students hoped to transform traditional China into a modern democratic individual, society, and Nation. The centenary commemoration of the May fourth movement and it's ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' still had an impact on the 2019 Hong Kong democratization movement. It seems that we need a more comprehensive and contextual in-depth understanding of the May Fourth movement on these 100 years. To celebrate the 100th anniversary of the May Fourth Movement in 2019, international academic conferences and forums have been held around the world and published important articles, researches, and books. However, standing in 2019 and after, we may need to consider why retrogression of narrow patriotism, exclusive nationalism, and even racism, which was disputed by The New Cultural Movement and The May Fourth Movement, is on the rise all of the worlds. At this moment, What are the real historical significances of the May Fourth Movement that we have to ask? Why it's ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' from 100 years ago still effective in our times? After a hundred years, it seems like we are going back to the original point of the question. Will the ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' and critical spirit will be an answer for today? The answer may have been given to us and maybe some of us dare not to face it or even do not want to have it. It all depends on how we face up the history and the present. A hundred years of researches, interpretations, and all kinds of narratives and discourses with vivid embracement and reconcile all the controversial issues made the May Fourth Movement is some sort of ideal nostalgia, historical rhetoric, and the power for the real weapon to recreate new ideal of ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science'. Now we have to gaze past hundred years and the next hundred years, and also face how to make future historical participant-observers not feel sad and failed, but hope that the history of the Chinese Renaissance will flourish again, just like It realized the enthusiasm, persistence, and endeavor of the younger generation and new cultural movement a hundred years ago.
Abstract
The May Fourth Movement in 1919 was the most important researching subject that infiltrated modern Chinese history. In particular, the May Fourth Movement developed into a comprehensive social and political reform movement covering the entire Chinese traditional culture. Based on The new cultural movement and its ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' passed on its renaissance torch to the May Fourth Movement. The centered on young intellectuals and students hoped to transform traditional China into a modern democratic individual, society, and Nation. The centenary commemoration of the May fourth movement and it's ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' still had an impact on the 2019 Hong Kong democratization movement. It seems that we need a more comprehensive and contextual in-depth understanding of the May Fourth movement on these 100 years. To celebrate the 100th anniversary of the May Fourth Movement in 2019, international academic conferences and forums have been held around the world and published important articles, researches, and books. However, standing in 2019 and after, we may need to consider why retrogression of narrow patriotism, exclusive nationalism, and even racism, which was disputed by The New Cultural Movement and The May Fourth Movement, is on the rise all of the worlds. At this moment, What are the real historical significances of the May Fourth Movement that we have to ask? Why it's ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' from 100 years ago still effective in our times? After a hundred years, it seems like we are going back to the original point of the question. Will the ideal ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science' and critical spirit will be an answer for today? The answer may have been given to us and maybe some of us dare not to face it or even do not want to have it. It all depends on how we face up the history and the present. A hundred years of researches, interpretations, and all kinds of narratives and discourses with vivid embracement and reconcile all the controversial issues made the May Fourth Movement is some sort of ideal nostalgia, historical rhetoric, and the power for the real weapon to recreate new ideal of ‘Democracy’ and ‘Science'. Now we have to gaze past hundred years and the next hundred years, and also face how to make future historical participant-observers not feel sad and failed, but hope that the history of the Chinese Renaissance will flourish again, just like It realized the enthusiasm, persistence, and endeavor of the younger generation and new cultural movement a hundred years ago.
참고문헌 (66)
- 강희정, "중국 오사기 저항담론으로서의 '서가'", 석사, 중어중문학, pp.2002
- 김민승, "「개벽」의 중국론과 근대인식: 이동국의 중국 정치⋅문화 논설을 중심으로", 석사, 동아시아학과, pp.2016
- 金鐘云, "五·四運動期의 新文化運動 연구", 박사, 사학, pp.1993
- 손자영, "신문화운동시기 북경대학 학생잡지"新潮"에 나타난 신도덕", 석사, 사학과, pp.2019
- 申一燮, "5.4新文化 運動期의 陳獨秀의 思想과 活動: 雜志‘新靑年’을 中心으로", 석사, 사학, pp.1987
- 유정식, "신문화운동기 이대조의 사상적 모색 : 민중인식의 심화와 마르크스주의의 수용을 중심으로", 석사, 역사교육, pp.2000
- 趙柄學, "新文化運動期의 『新靑年』誌 考察 : 5.4 運動 以前을 중심으로", 석사, pp.1993
- 황선미, "신문화운동기의 『신청년』번역 작품 연구", 박사, 중어중문학과 중국문학전공, pp.2012
- "兩岸學者: 批判精神可惜淡了", 聯合報, 2009.5.5, A9~ (2009)
- Chow Tse-tung, "The May Fourth Movement : Intellectual Revolution in Modern China" (1960), Harvard University Press
- "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" (1905)[URL]
- Morris Janowitz, "The Reconstruction of Patriotism : Education for Civic Consciousness" (1983), University of Chicago Press
- 簡明海, "五四意識在台灣" (2019), 遠流成文化
- 동양사학회편집부, "亞細亞의 民族主義運動", 동양사학연구, 4 (1970)
- 羅志田, "民族主義與近代中國思想" (1998), 東大圖書公司
- 羅志田, "天下國家與社會: 我們怎樣看“五四”", 探索與爭鳴, (五) (2019)
- 羅志田, "民族主義與近代中國思想" (1998), 東大圖書公司
- 閔斗基, "5⋅4運動의 歷史的性格", 동양사학연구, 4 (1970)
- 閔斗基, "中國近代史論 I" (1988), 지식산업사
- 민두기, "中國에서의 自由主義의 實驗" (1996), 지식산업사
- 백영서, "3⋅1운동과 5⋅4운동은 현재 진행 중인 혁명이다", 한겨레신문, 2019.05.04., ~ (2019)
- 白永瑞, "活力東亞的1919: 作爲革命起點的“五四”与“三一”", 探索與爭鳴:紀念五四運動100周年專輯, (五) (2019)
- 北京大學出土文獻研究所, "北京大學藏西漢竹書⋅貳" (2019), 上海古籍出版社
- 艾瑞克⋅霍布斯鮑姆, "極端的年代(1914-1991)" (2017), 中信出版社
- 양태근, "민주화와 본토화의 이중주 ― 대만의식과 대만 사회 운동의 성장 과정 ―", 중국근현대사연구, (55), pp.193~225 (2012), 중국근현대사학회
- 余英時, "試釋"五四"新文化運動的歷史作用", 思想, 37 (2019), 聯經出版社
- 余英時, "五四精神是一股真實的歷史動力", 思想, 37 (2019), 聯經出版社
- 王德威, "魯迅、韓松與未完的文學革命――“懸想”與“神思”", 探索與爭鳴, (五) (2019)
- 王德威, "五四@100: 文化⋅思想⋅歷史" (2019), 聯經出版社
- 王德威, "眾聲喧嘩: 30年代與80年代的中國小說" (1988), 遠流
- 王汎森, "啓蒙是連續的嗎", 探索與爭鳴: 紀念五四運動100周年專輯, (五) (2019)
- 王汎森, "傅斯年: 中國近代歷史與政治中的個體生命" (2014), 聯經
- 汪暉, "現代中國思想的興起: 科學話語共同體" (2004), 生活讀書新知三聯書店
- 임상범, "1919년 5~6월에 북경인의 大事와 細故 : ‘공간'⋅‘생활'⋅‘사건'", 歷史硏究, 213 (2012)
- 임상범, "2000년 이후 한국의 5⋅4신문화운동 연구 동향과 향후 과제", 중국학보, (81), pp.409~431 (2017), 한국중국학회[DOI]
- 임상범, "20세기 후반기 한국에서의 5ㆍ4운동 연구사", 중국근현대사연구, (64), pp.247~289 (2014), 중국근현대사학회
- 임형택, "1919년 동아시아, 3․1운동과 5․4운동", 대동문화연구, (66), pp.175~203 (2009), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 자오팅양, "천하체계: 21세기 중국의 세계 인식" (2010), 길
- 조경란, "국가, 유학, 지식인 : 현대 중국의 보수주의와 민족주의" (2016), 책세상
- 周昌龍, "新思潮與傳統: 五四思想史論集" (1995), 時報文化
- 周策縱, "五四運動: 現代中國的思想革命" (1996), 江蘇人民出版社
- 周策縱, "周策縱作品集: 修辭立其誠――周策縱訪談集" (2018)
- 周策縱, "周策縱作品集: 修辭立其誠――周策縱訪談集" (2018)
- 周策縱, "周策縱作品集: 修辭立其誠――周策縱訪談集" (2018)
- 陳芳明, "五四精神不在台灣", 聯合文學, 12(7) (1996)
- 陳永發, "毛澤東如何綁架五四歷史", 思想史, 9 (2019), 聯經出版社
- 陳平原, "“五四”與現代中國", 探索與爭鳴, (五) (2019)
- 陳平原, "觸摸歷史與進入五四" (2010), 北京大學出版社
- 陳學然, "五四在香港: 殖民情景、民族主義及本土意識" (1994), 中華書局
- 車太根, "新文化運動與韓中思想連鎖的重合", 五四運動100週年國際學術研討會―會議論文集, 2
- 차태근, "한국 신문화운동과 중국의 시좌", 한국학연구, (54), pp.215~254 (2019), 한국학연구소[DOI]
- 沈衛威, "哥大哈佛執政: 兩大留美學人群對中國新教育及新文學的貢獻", 探索與爭鳴: 紀念五四運動100周年專輯 (2019)
- 彭明輝, "五四在時光的河流裏", 台灣新生報, 1989.5.4., ~ (1989)
- 호적(胡適), "中國古代哲學史" (1990), 대한교과서
- 胡適, ""五四"的第二十八周年", 胡適文集, 11 (1998), 北京大學出版社
- 胡適, "紀念“五四”", 胡適文集, 11
- 胡適, "五四運動是青年愛國的運動", 胡適文集, 12
- 胡適, "問題與主義", 胡適文集, 2
- 胡適, "我們對於學生的希望", 胡適文集, 11
- 胡適, "五四運動紀念", 胡適文集, 12
- 胡適, "五四運動是青年愛國的運動", 胡適文集, 12
- 胡適, "胡適口述自傳", 胡適文集, 1
- 胡適, "胡適全集: 胡適時論集" (2018), 中研院近史所
- 黃克武, "意識形態與學術思想的糾結 : 1950年代港臺朝野的五四論述", 思想史, 9 (2019), 聯經出版社
- 黃克武, "重估傳統再造文明: 知識分子與五四新文化運動", 秀威 (2019)
- 黃自進, "日本駐華領館對五四學生愛國運動的觀察", 思想史, 9 (2019), 聯經出版社
