각성의 시대에 도모하는 ‘공(公)’— 윈다이잉(惲代英)의 5⋅4 문화운동과 사회개조론 재독

Abstract

How can we deal with the historical memories that promoted the reform in China after the May Fourth Movement of 1919? In the cultural stage of China in the 21st country, various efforts are being made to exclusively dominate the historical memories of the Chinese Revolution as we can see in the drama The Awakening Age. In the cultural stage of China in the 21st country, such efforts to exclusively dominate the historical memories of China in the 20th century will not cease. With the critical interpretation of this cultural stage in mind, this study was intended to reapproach, in the following context, Yun Daiying’s May Fourth Movement and the Argument of Social Reconstruction observed in Wuchang. Reproduction of the memories of the revolution is not necessarily achieved only with the correct frame. It is required to ponder over it while fully understanding the context of the actors who promote the revolution. What gives rise to the state in which the actors promoting the reform as well as their reason, will, emotion and heart such as determination? How does the mind power act? While analyzing the social group activities such as “Huzhu-she” and “Liqun-shushe” appeared in Yun Daiying’s Wuchang, this study aims to structure in abundance the context of the actors, based on the interpretation of the reason, will and emotions that encouraged his rvolution. While paying attention to the situation in which the order of “impartiality” is destroyed in rural areas, this study inquires into how the actors of the “社團social group,” an autonomous solidarity-based association of local people during the May Fourth Movement concern about the destruction of “impartiality” that occurs in their life environment. By meticulously reading Yun daiying, this study explores how the actors of these autonomous solidarity-based associations are struggling to reconstruct the commons and recover the social heart that had been torn down. Awakening is not supposed to be limited to a matter of urban intellectual enlightenment. It is necessary to concern about the regime of the broken social heart and find a way to enliven impartiality, as well as make a careful review regarding how the regime of a new heart such as reason, will and determination required for this task of enlivenment can be prepared, in other words, the social, cultural and historical context of subjectivization of the awakening.