釜山韓國華人華文文學的實踐與意義 — 以身份認同爲中心
The Practice and Significance of Busan Chinese-Korean Chinese-Language Literature: Centered on the Identity
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
“Busan Chinese-Korean” refer to Han Chinese who have lived in the Busan area of South Korea for a long time and groups that have been assimilated or culturally integrated by Han Chinese. The literary works written in Chinese language by Busan Chinese-Korean is “Busan Chinese-Korean Chinese-Language Literature”. According to the different migration period, Busan Chinese-Korean can be divided into earlier group, later group, newcomers group, and relocating group (who moved to Busan and then relocated to other countries). The immigration history of Busan Chinese-Korean is unique from that of Chinese-Korean in other parts of Korea: First, there is perfect “mobility” among Busan Chinese-Korean. Second, Choryang area where most Busan Chinese-Korean stay is more “diversified” in terms of geographic environment. The “mobility” of Busan Chinese-Korean may cause instability in life and restrict the development of its literature or cultural activities. The environmental “diversity” in the areas where Busan Chinese-Korean mainly migrates may become an obstacle to their assimilation into locals, and ultimately affect their identity. The significance of Busan Chinese-Korean literature is that, as a platform for Busan Chinese-Korean to speak out, it brings us a lot of inspiration: Busan Chinese-Korean identity is already “diversified”, but from the perspective of acceptance by the immigrant society, it seems that it has not been synchronized. Regrettably, the understanding of Busan Chinese-Korean by the locals is still a product of South Korea-China relations formed under historical situations such as pre-modern, modern, and cold war era. In other words, it is to ignore Busan Chinese-Korean “existence” to imagine Busan Chinese-Korean. Therefore, Busan Chinese-Korean survival experience in the emigrated place made them never be able to integrate into the local area. With the urban redevelopment of Busan, the “China Town” with the closest relationship to Busan Chinese-Korean, has gradually lost its “historicality” and “relationship” which is the “sense of place” it should have. Busan Chinese-Korean identity can no longer be measured by the standard of “identity recognized by society (nationality)”, and it can be regulated as “Chinese”, “Korean” or “Taiwanese”. Busan should accept this new type of multiple identities based on “personal choice” to recognize and preserve the history that Busan Chinese-Korean and the local people in Busan have experienced and created together.
Abstract
“Busan Chinese-Korean” refer to Han Chinese who have lived in the Busan area of South Korea for a long time and groups that have been assimilated or culturally integrated by Han Chinese. The literary works written in Chinese language by Busan Chinese-Korean is “Busan Chinese-Korean Chinese-Language Literature”. According to the different migration period, Busan Chinese-Korean can be divided into earlier group, later group, newcomers group, and relocating group (who moved to Busan and then relocated to other countries). The immigration history of Busan Chinese-Korean is unique from that of Chinese-Korean in other parts of Korea: First, there is perfect “mobility” among Busan Chinese-Korean. Second, Choryang area where most Busan Chinese-Korean stay is more “diversified” in terms of geographic environment. The “mobility” of Busan Chinese-Korean may cause instability in life and restrict the development of its literature or cultural activities. The environmental “diversity” in the areas where Busan Chinese-Korean mainly migrates may become an obstacle to their assimilation into locals, and ultimately affect their identity. The significance of Busan Chinese-Korean literature is that, as a platform for Busan Chinese-Korean to speak out, it brings us a lot of inspiration: Busan Chinese-Korean identity is already “diversified”, but from the perspective of acceptance by the immigrant society, it seems that it has not been synchronized. Regrettably, the understanding of Busan Chinese-Korean by the locals is still a product of South Korea-China relations formed under historical situations such as pre-modern, modern, and cold war era. In other words, it is to ignore Busan Chinese-Korean “existence” to imagine Busan Chinese-Korean. Therefore, Busan Chinese-Korean survival experience in the emigrated place made them never be able to integrate into the local area. With the urban redevelopment of Busan, the “China Town” with the closest relationship to Busan Chinese-Korean, has gradually lost its “historicality” and “relationship” which is the “sense of place” it should have. Busan Chinese-Korean identity can no longer be measured by the standard of “identity recognized by society (nationality)”, and it can be regulated as “Chinese”, “Korean” or “Taiwanese”. Busan should accept this new type of multiple identities based on “personal choice” to recognize and preserve the history that Busan Chinese-Korean and the local people in Busan have experienced and created together.
참고문헌 (30)
- 김혜준, "화인화문문학(華人華文文學) 연구를 위한 시론", 중국어문논총, (50), pp.77~116 (2011), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 김태만, "내 안의 타자, 부산 차이니스 디아스포라" (2009), 부산발전연구원
- 마르크 오제, "비장소 ― 초근대성의 인류학 입문" (2018), 아카넷
- 박은경, "한국화교의 종족성" (1986), 한국연구원
- 송영민, "문화자원 활용공간의 장소 정체성 강화방안", 한국공간디자인학회 논문집, 10(5), pp.103~112 (2015), 한국공간디자인학회[DOI]
- 아마르티아 센, "정체성과 폭력" (2015), 바이북스
- 왕더웨이, "시노폰 담론 중국문학: 현대성의 다양한 목소리" (2017), 학고방
- 이옥련, "인천 화교 사회의 형성과 전개" (2008), 인천문화재단
- 장세훈, "'부산속의아시아',부산 초량동 중화가의 사회생태학적 연구", 경제와 사회, (81), pp.300~332 (2009), 비판사회학회
- 정은주, "'이방인'에 대한 시선 - 해방 이후 한국 언론 담론에 재현된 화교", 인문과학, 113, pp.105~146 (2018), 인문학연구원[DOI]
- 조세현(曹世炫), "부산화교의 역사" (2013), 산지니
- 존 로크, "인간오성론" (2009), 다락원
- 허설화, "탈근대사회 유연한 정체성에 대한 고찰:재한 화교를 중심으로", 재외한인연구, (50), pp.85~110 (2020), 재외한인학회
- 李文, "蒲公英――文麒留韓記" (2017), 人民日報出版社
- 梁楠, "韓國華人華文文學論――多變的身分,多重的認同" (2020), 秀威出版社
- 梁必承, "韓國,沒有中國城的國家" (2000), 淸華大學出版社
- "韓華春秋", 韓華春秋編輯委員會,1964.6-1965.12, ~ (1965)
- "韓華", 韓中文化協會,1990.5-1991.2., ~ (1991)
- "韓華世界", 韓華基金會,2009-2011, ~ (2011)
- 郝明義, "故事" (2004), 大塊文化出版股份有限公司
- 김혜준, "韓國華人華文文學初探", 중국어문논총, (55), pp.323~343 (2012), 중국어문연구회[DOI]
- 周敏, "唐人街――深具社會經濟潛質的華人社區" (1995), 商務印書館
- 秦裕光, "旅韓六十年見聞錄—―韓國華僑史話" (1983), 中華民國韓國研究學會
- 初安民, "愁心先醉" (1985), 晨星出版社
- 程國君, "全球化與新移民敘事 ――≪ 美華文學 ≫與北美新移民文學研究" (2018), 科學出版社
- 楊昭全, "朝鮮華僑史" (1991), 中國華僑出版公司
- 華僑志編纂委員會, "華僑志-韓國" (1958), 海天出版社
- "부산역사문화대전"[URL]
- "한국향토문화전자대전(한국학중앙연구원)"[URL]
- "南加州韓華聯誼會網站"[URL]
