본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사건으로서의 「十年」 ― 홍콩영화 「十年」에 대한 고찰

Ten Years as a Event: A Study on a Hong Kong Film Ten Years

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

Ten Years is an omnibus film that foreshadowed the dark future of Hong Kong ten years later imagined based on the present and drew Hong Kong people's empathy. Winning the Best Picture Award of the Hong Kong Film Awards in 2016, the film expanded into one happening, making Chinese people uncomfortable. Ten Years points out the problems of the current system through the current situation of Hong Kong and the prospects for the future, and insists on the revolution. The main emotion revealed in the film is ‘fear'. Their target of fear is very specific. It is a ‘red color system'. In short, the film Ten Years is a dark prophecy created by the fear of red. It is the core of their fear that tragic prophecy and tragic imagination will become reality. The film was composed of five short films; Extras which contains a political strategy for the introduction of the National Security Law that restricts freedom of speech and political activities, Season of the End which deals with men and women who make everything of disappearing Hong Kong as samples, Dialect which depicts the plight of a taxi driver who knows only Cantonese in a situation where the use of Chinese standard language became mandatory, Self-Immolator which depicts the story of choosing to burn himself to live as a Hong Kong citizen not Chinese, Local Egg which contains a story that children were educated in a Chinese way became Boy Scouts to suppress Hong Kong's unique culture etc. The low-budget omnibus film, Ten Years, sets year 2025 as the axis of time and delicately depicts the situation in which Hong Kong identity is lost and China's control is strengthened. Despite the fact that the film was defined as ‘ideological virus' through the Global Times, a sister newspaper of a Communist paper ‘People's Daily’, controversies and concrete movements arising from the film Ten Years make Ten Years an issue as the film won the Best Picture Award.

Abstract

Ten Years is an omnibus film that foreshadowed the dark future of Hong Kong ten years later imagined based on the present and drew Hong Kong people's empathy. Winning the Best Picture Award of the Hong Kong Film Awards in 2016, the film expanded into one happening, making Chinese people uncomfortable. Ten Years points out the problems of the current system through the current situation of Hong Kong and the prospects for the future, and insists on the revolution. The main emotion revealed in the film is ‘fear'. Their target of fear is very specific. It is a ‘red color system'. In short, the film Ten Years is a dark prophecy created by the fear of red. It is the core of their fear that tragic prophecy and tragic imagination will become reality. The film was composed of five short films; Extras which contains a political strategy for the introduction of the National Security Law that restricts freedom of speech and political activities, Season of the End which deals with men and women who make everything of disappearing Hong Kong as samples, Dialect which depicts the plight of a taxi driver who knows only Cantonese in a situation where the use of Chinese standard language became mandatory, Self-Immolator which depicts the story of choosing to burn himself to live as a Hong Kong citizen not Chinese, Local Egg which contains a story that children were educated in a Chinese way became Boy Scouts to suppress Hong Kong's unique culture etc. The low-budget omnibus film, Ten Years, sets year 2025 as the axis of time and delicately depicts the situation in which Hong Kong identity is lost and China's control is strengthened. Despite the fact that the film was defined as ‘ideological virus' through the Global Times, a sister newspaper of a Communist paper ‘People's Daily’, controversies and concrete movements arising from the film Ten Years make Ten Years an issue as the film won the Best Picture Award.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 드니 이요, "홍콩: 중국과의 해후" (1998), 시공사
  2. 아리프 딜릭, "포스트모더니티의 역사들" (2005), 창비
  3. 유영하, "홍콩: 천 가지 표정의 도시" (2008), 살림
  4. 얀 아스만, "이집트인 모세: 서구 유일신교에 새겨진 이집트의 기억" (2010), 그린비
  5. 알라이다 아스만, "기억의 공간" (2011), 그린비
  6. 아르준 아파두라이, "소수에 대한 두려움" (2011), 에코리브르
  7. 피에르 부르디외, "언어와 상징권력" (2014), 나남
  8. 유영하, "홍콩 민족주의와 홍콩 본토주의" (2014), 산지니
  9. 자크 랑시에르, "불화 : 정치와 철학" (2015), 길
  10. Alain Badiou, "철학과 사건" (2015), 오월의 봄
  11. Barry Sautman, "홍콩 본토파와 ‘메뚜기론’: 신세기의 우익 포퓰리즘", 황해문화 (2016)
  12. 장정아, "홍콩, 민주주의를 배우기 시작했다", 한국일보, ~ (2014)
  13. 장정아, "이 폐허를 응시하라 ― 홍콩 우산혁명과 그 이후의 갈등이 드러낸 것", 황해문화 (2016)
  14. 장정아, "홍콩, 2016 ‘어묵혁명’은 왜 일어났나?", 프레시안, ~ (2016)
  15. 장정아, "홍콩의 중국본토 이주민: 변화와 지속", 중앙사론, (37), pp.393~426 (2013), 중앙사학연구소
  16. 장정아, "타자로서의 이주민:홍콩의 중국본토 이주민(新移民)", 비교문화연구, 8(2), pp.37~78 (2002), 비교문화연구소
  17. 성연철, "“홍콩 독립” 홍콩민족당 창당", 한계레, ~ (2016)
  18. 안영은, "중국의 신곡(神曲) <탄터(忐忑)> 초탐(初探)", 중국연구, 58, pp.89~107 (2013), 중국연구소
  19. 진성희, "97년 후 홍콩영화의 좌절과 도전", 중국소설논총, (36), pp.193~210 (2012), 한국중국소설학회
  20. 윤영도, "홍콩 영상매체 속 ‘내지 신이민’ 재현과 문화정치학의 변천", 중국현대문학, (63), pp.211~245 (2012), 한국중국현대문학학회
  21. 김수환, "전체성과 그 잉여들: 문화기호학과 정치철학을 중심으로", 사회와 철학, (18), pp.71~98 (2009), 한국사회와철학연구회
  22. "중국 요즘 최대 유행어 ‘탄터증후군’은 무슨 뜻?", 경향신문, ~ (2011)
  23. 김영미, "스릴러영화 같은 홍콩의 ‘어묵혁명’", 시사IN, ~ (2016)
  24. 전경웅, "中공산당, 반공서적 판 홍콩 서점관계자 연쇄납치?", NewDaily, ~ (2016)
  25. "중국 통제 강화 예언 홍콩영화 ‘10년', 종영 후에도 화제", 연합뉴스, ~ (2016)
  26. 鄭煒, "「雨傘運動」: 中國邊陲的抗爭政治", 21世紀評論 (2015)
  27. 周亮, "在尋根與出走之外: 後植民香港血統與香港本土論述的想像", 嶺南人, 121 (2016), 第四十九屆嶺南大學學生會編輯委員會
  28. 益多, "达赖集团是拉萨暴力事件的策划和煽动者", 新華網, ~ (2008)
  29. "Britain's Betrayal of Hong Kong", The Wall Street Journal, ~ (2014)
  30. "「十年」夺香港金像奖最佳电影 陆媒噤声", ~ (2016)
  31. "内地封杀「十年」 金像奖够胆颁奖", ~ (2016)
  32. 屠海鸣, "得奘是香港的悲哀", 大公報, ~ (2016)
  33. "「十年」是否够資格得奖? 林建岳杜琪峰意見相左", ~ (2016)
  34. "위키백과", ~
  35. "百度百科", ~
  36. "다음백과", ~
  37. "U2電影館", ~
  38. "영화 「十年(Ten Years)」", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)