‘권/권리’ 개념 절합의 계보학 — 『만국공법』을 중심으로
Study of the Genealogy of the Conceptual Articulation of ‘Quan/Kwon/Ken(權)’:Focusing on the Translation of Wanguogongfa(萬國公法)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Among the modern conceptual words created by William Martin as a translated language in the Wanguogongfa(萬國公法), relatively few have survived. And the words related to ‘Quan/Kwon/Ken(權)’ have some quite portion among the few. 'Quan/Kwon/Ken' can be said to be a very problematic translated word because it has been wondered if it properly contains the meaning of the original language (English) as a translation language. In this paper, I would like to examine the genealogies of the epistemic articulation that took place in the course of the transition of the modern discourse order in East Asia countries, focusing on the translation of “Quan/Kwon/Ken”, which is one of the translated words of Wanguogongfa that survived in the modern discourse. Not only in that it is a fundamental concept that defines the relationship between the modern nation-state and its most basic members, the people (or citizens), but at the same time, it is the premise of the existence of the state, like sovereignty, which is the most fundamental of the modern international order. It can be said that it is very meaningful work to re-examine the process of the modern transition of the discourse order from the point of view of the concept related to “Quan/Kwon/Ken”.
Abstract
Among the modern conceptual words created by William Martin as a translated language in the Wanguogongfa(萬國公法), relatively few have survived. And the words related to ‘Quan/Kwon/Ken(權)’ have some quite portion among the few. 'Quan/Kwon/Ken' can be said to be a very problematic translated word because it has been wondered if it properly contains the meaning of the original language (English) as a translation language. In this paper, I would like to examine the genealogies of the epistemic articulation that took place in the course of the transition of the modern discourse order in East Asia countries, focusing on the translation of “Quan/Kwon/Ken”, which is one of the translated words of Wanguogongfa that survived in the modern discourse. Not only in that it is a fundamental concept that defines the relationship between the modern nation-state and its most basic members, the people (or citizens), but at the same time, it is the premise of the existence of the state, like sovereignty, which is the most fundamental of the modern international order. It can be said that it is very meaningful work to re-examine the process of the modern transition of the discourse order from the point of view of the concept related to “Quan/Kwon/Ken”.
참고문헌 (17)
- Liu, Lydia H., "Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity—China, 1900-1937" (1995), Stanford University Press
- Liu, Lydia H., "Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations" (1999), Duke University Press
- Medhurst, Walter Henry, "English and Chinese Dictionary Vol. II" (1848), Mission Press
- Morrison, Robert, "A Dictionary of the Chinese Language Vol.1 ―Part1" (1815), The Honorable East India Company’s Press
- Morrison, Robert, "A Dictionary of the Chinese Language Vol.3 ―Part1" (1823), The Honorable East India Company’s Press
- Morrison, Robert, "A Dictionary of the Chinese Language ― Part3" (1822), The Honorable East India Company’s Press
- 丁韙良, "萬國公法" (1864), 京都崇實館
- 丁韙良, "公法會通" (1880), 同文館
- 김봉진, "서구 ‘권리’ 관념의 수용과 변용 ― 유길준과 후쿠자와 유키치의 비교 고찰", 동방학지, (145), pp.65~104 (2009), 국학연구원
- 차태근, "충돌하는 제국 : 서구 문명은 어떻게 중국이란 코끼리를 넘어뜨렸나" (2016), 글항아리
- 마루야마 마사오, "번역과 일본의 근대" (2000), 이산
- 미조구치 유조, "중국의 공과 사" (2004), 신서원
- 번역자의 과제 외, "언어 일반과 인간의 언어에 대하여", pp.2008, 벤야민, 발터
- 야나부 아키라, "번역어 성립 사정" (2003), 일빛
- 진관타오, "관념사란 무엇인가 2 ― 관념의 변천과 용어" (2010), 푸른역사
- 푸코, 미셸, "말과 사물" (1987), 민음사
- 홉스봄, 에릭, "제국의 시대" (1998), 한길사