류칭(柳靑) 『창업사(創業史)』의 평가와 그 문학성
Evaluations and Literary Achivements of Liu Qing’s Builders of a New Life
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Liu Qing's Builders of a New Life has a clear theme when it is compared with other works based on the 17 years' mutual cooperative movement. It is written on the thematic consciousness to show “why the socialist revolution is occurring in the Chinese rural and how this revolution is progressing”, it shows “the change of behaviors, ideas, and emotions of characters during the movement”. Due to this clear thematic consciousness, this work received high praise from critics at the time of its presentation. However, after the reform and opening up, for that very reason, it was located in the center of controversy, because this work was tied to the Mao literary thought and agricultural policy. However, there is a problem in evaluating this work as a whole with that of Mao. There are three reasons for this. First, because it is not right to evaluate Mao as a whole, second, because the work has the specificity of literature, and third, even though under the social control of the Mao period it is necessary to consider that there are differences among people who lived in the Mao period. Liu Qing was one of the first generation writers of liberated area. Following Mao's speech in Yan'an literature and art conference, he moved to rural areas with the whole family and lived with farmers ― it is the so-called ‘the 14 years in Hwangfu', and he participated directly in the movement with farmers. Builders of a New Life was based on that experience. Originally planned as a four-part work, the work was delayed amid political changes in China and ended unfinished due to Liu Qing's death. This fact symbolizes the complex fate of this work. Due to the clear political consciousness revealed in the work, the controversy may continue over the evaluation of this work according to the conditions, political positions, and tastes each reader has. However, the work successfully created the figures of characters, and they make every reader think and feel according to their respective circumstances, and I think that is the literary achievement achieved by Builders of a New Life. This work is an excellent work that shows how the rural communities and farmers had the hope for a happy future dreamed through Mao. I think it will be evaluated as an important novel in modern Chinese literature.
Abstract
Liu Qing's Builders of a New Life has a clear theme when it is compared with other works based on the 17 years' mutual cooperative movement. It is written on the thematic consciousness to show “why the socialist revolution is occurring in the Chinese rural and how this revolution is progressing”, it shows “the change of behaviors, ideas, and emotions of characters during the movement”. Due to this clear thematic consciousness, this work received high praise from critics at the time of its presentation. However, after the reform and opening up, for that very reason, it was located in the center of controversy, because this work was tied to the Mao literary thought and agricultural policy. However, there is a problem in evaluating this work as a whole with that of Mao. There are three reasons for this. First, because it is not right to evaluate Mao as a whole, second, because the work has the specificity of literature, and third, even though under the social control of the Mao period it is necessary to consider that there are differences among people who lived in the Mao period. Liu Qing was one of the first generation writers of liberated area. Following Mao's speech in Yan'an literature and art conference, he moved to rural areas with the whole family and lived with farmers ― it is the so-called ‘the 14 years in Hwangfu', and he participated directly in the movement with farmers. Builders of a New Life was based on that experience. Originally planned as a four-part work, the work was delayed amid political changes in China and ended unfinished due to Liu Qing's death. This fact symbolizes the complex fate of this work. Due to the clear political consciousness revealed in the work, the controversy may continue over the evaluation of this work according to the conditions, political positions, and tastes each reader has. However, the work successfully created the figures of characters, and they make every reader think and feel according to their respective circumstances, and I think that is the literary achievement achieved by Builders of a New Life. This work is an excellent work that shows how the rural communities and farmers had the hope for a happy future dreamed through Mao. I think it will be evaluated as an important novel in modern Chinese literature.
참고문헌 (38)
- 柳靑, "创业史(第一部)" (2000), 中国青年
- 柳靑, "创业史(第一部)" (1977), 中国青年
- 柳靑, "创业史(一二部合集)" (2009), 中国青年
- 柳靑, "柳靑小說散文文集" (1979), 中國靑年
- 江晓天, "也谈柳青和"创业史"", 文艺理论與批评 (1990)
- 董潁夫, "柳靑紀念文集" (2016), 西安出版社
- 刘可风, "柳青传" (2016), 人民文学
- 刘纳, "写得怎样: 关於作品的文学评價——重读"创业史"并以其为例", 文学评论 (2005)
- 刘寧, "两種现实主义的论争——柳青研究六十年的回顾與思考", 中国现代文学研究丛刊 (2011)
- 孟廣来, "柳青专集" (1982), 福建人民
- 蒙萬夫, "柳青写作生涯" (1985), 百花文艺
- 蒙萬夫, "柳青专略" (1988), 陝西人民教育
- 本社, "大寫的人" (1982), 中國靑年
- 山东大学中文系, "柳青专集" (1979), 山东大学
- 萨支山, "试论五十至七十年代“农村题材”长篇小说——以"三里灣"、"山乡巨变"、"创业史"为中心", 文学评论 (2001)
- 宋炳輝, "“柳靑現象”的啓示――重評長篇小說"創業史"", 上海文論 (1988)
- 阎纲, "四访柳青", 當代 (1979)
- 阎纲, "新版"创业史"的修改情况", 新文学史料 (1980)
- 阎纲, "創業史與小說藝術" (1981), 上海文藝
- 仵埂, "柳靑硏究文集" (2016), 西安出版社
- 王春林, "新型农民形象與叙事逻辑——关仁山"金谷银山"與柳青"创业史"比较谈", 南方文坛, (3) (2018)
- 이선옥, "류칭(柳靑)의 삶과 문학, 그 문제성", 중국현대문학, (92), pp.33~65 (2020), 한국중국현대문학학회[DOI]
- 人文雜誌編輯部 陝西省社科院文學硏究所, "柳靑紀念文集", ~ (1983)
- 张柠, "五六十年代作家"下乡"考", 东吴学术 (2018)
- 程光煒, "论50~70年代文学中的农民形象", 中国现代文学研究丛刊 (2001)
- 程光煒, "柳青、皇甫村與20世纪80年代", 文学评论 (2018)
- 赵学勇, "经典的剥蚀: “柳青现象”的文学史叙事及反思", 當代文坛 (2011)
- 冯牧, "初读"创业史"", 文艺报, (1) (1960)
- 贺桂梅, "“总體性世界”的文学书写: 重读"创业史"", 文艺争鸣 (2018)
- 贺仲明, "一個未完成的梦——论柳青"创业史"中的改霞形象", 文学评论 (2017)
- 贺仲明, "重论“十七年”乡村题材小说的理想性问题", 文学评论, (2) (2012)
- 贺仲明, "真实的尺度——重评50年代农业合作化题材小说", 文学评论 (2003)
- 贺仲明, "乡土小说研究的前景與困惑——贺仲明教授访谈录", 河北民族师范学院学报, (01) (2020)
- 邢小利, "柳靑年譜" (2016), 人民文學
- 邢小利, "柳青晚年的读书與反思", 炎黄春秋 (2016)
- 胡飞海, "柳青研究七十年述评", 西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版) (2018)
- 洪子诚, "文学史中的柳青和赵树理(1949—1970)", 文艺争鸣 (2018)
- 洪子诚, "當代中國文學的藝術問題" (1986), 北京大學
