본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

산림유전자원보호구역의 관리효과성 평가 적용

Management Effectiveness Evaluation(MEE) in Protected Areas for Forest Genetic Resources

2

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study aims to assess MEE(management effectiveness evaluations) on PAs(protected areas) for forest genetic resources which play an important role in biodiversity conservation, and then to suggest better ways to manage PAs for forest genetic resources. This study applies same indicators of the MEE on PAs as the ones described in the prior study(Ryu et al. 2011). The indicators applied are composed of five elements, thirty-two indicators which all would be grouped into one element by each traits. Overall indicators belonging to the element of output and outcome are comparatively low. Especially the ones related to the change of biodiversity, degree of ecosystem health, variation of civil complaint and visitor satisfaction are ranked mostly low. The element of input shows the low rank on the number of staff and budget. The score of indicators related to the identification of the threats of PAs and local communities' supports turn out to be low in the element of Context. The element of process, however, has scored low on Staff management, Education/Aw reness programs and Governance, while the law enforcement, management regulation and capacity to prevent forest disasters have made relatively high score. Meanwhile, all indicators in the element of planning have scored relatively high as compared to the indicators belonged to other elements. This study suggests to strengthen a few constructive proposals, such as facilitating efficient management framework for PAs, developing local community cooperation program, establishing survey, research and monitoring system, and registering PAs to the WDPA(World Database on Protected Areas) according to the IUCN categories.

Abstract

This study aims to assess MEE(management effectiveness evaluations) on PAs(protected areas) for forest genetic resources which play an important role in biodiversity conservation, and then to suggest better ways to manage PAs for forest genetic resources. This study applies same indicators of the MEE on PAs as the ones described in the prior study(Ryu et al. 2011). The indicators applied are composed of five elements, thirty-two indicators which all would be grouped into one element by each traits. Overall indicators belonging to the element of output and outcome are comparatively low. Especially the ones related to the change of biodiversity, degree of ecosystem health, variation of civil complaint and visitor satisfaction are ranked mostly low. The element of input shows the low rank on the number of staff and budget. The score of indicators related to the identification of the threats of PAs and local communities' supports turn out to be low in the element of Context. The element of process, however, has scored low on Staff management, Education/Aw reness programs and Governance, while the law enforcement, management regulation and capacity to prevent forest disasters have made relatively high score. Meanwhile, all indicators in the element of planning have scored relatively high as compared to the indicators belonged to other elements. This study suggests to strengthen a few constructive proposals, such as facilitating efficient management framework for PAs, developing local community cooperation program, establishing survey, research and monitoring system, and registering PAs to the WDPA(World Database on Protected Areas) according to the IUCN categories.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 산림유전자원보호림의 보전・관리방안에 관한 연구(1), "산림청", 산림청, ~ (2006)
  2. 산림유전자원보호림의 보전・관리방안에 관한 연구(2), "산림청", 산림청, ~ (2007)
  3. 선진외국의 보호지역 관리기법 연구, "환경부", ~ (2006)
  4. 한국의 보호지역(보호지역 시스템에 대한 효과성 평가), "환경부", 환경부, ~ (2009)
  5. Heo, H.Y, "A study on the development of evaluation model of management effectiveness for adaptive management of protected areas", 박사, pp.2006
  6. Hockings, M, "Evaluating effectiveness: A framework for assesing management effectiveness of protected areas, In Best Practice Protected Area Guideliens Series 14 (2nd edition)" (2006), IUCN
  7. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas: Report for the project ‘Global study into management effectiveness evaluation of protected area’, "Leverington, F", IUCN, ~ (2008)
  8. Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas- A global study, "Leverington, F", IUCN, ~, pp.supplementary report No. 1: Overview of approaches and methodologies (2008)
  9. Leverington, F, "Management effectiveness evaluation in protected areas-a global study. Second edition 2010" (2010), The university of Queensland, TNC, WWF, IUCN, WCPA
  10. 류광수, "산림보호지역의 관리효과성 평가지표 개발 연구", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 14(1), pp.105~119 (2011), 한국환경복원기술학회
  11. UNEP, , Report of the tenth meeting of the conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity (2010)
  12. Are protected areas working? An alalysis of forest protected areas by WWF, "WWF", WWF International, ~ (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)