초상과 성명의 보호에 관한 연구* - 초상권과 성명권의 침해구제를 중심으로 -
A study on remedies for publicity infringement
0
조회
0
다운로드
26
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One who appropriates to his own use or benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability for invasion of his privacy. “Privacy” right is defined as personal and non-assignable right to be free of embarrassment and humiliation. However, in order to protect the pecuniary value of name or likeness, the right of publicity arose from the right of privacy. It serves two primary purposes: (1) to protect all persons from the anguish that may accompany the unwanted use of their identity; and (2) to protect the property interest that persons, especially celebrities, have in their identities. There is no right of publicity statute in Korea and torts include appropriation of individual's identity such as name and likeness for advantage. Recently, the Congress made two bills of amendment copyright law. One defines the right of publicity as copyright. The other suggests new remedy for infringement of copyright on the Internet. It includes the order of the Minister of Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism to (1) shut down the individual user's internet cafe or blog, (2) suspend or cancel the individual user's account, and (3) suspend or cancel the information and communication service. However, there is criticism that whether publicity is copyrightable and the Minister's order may invade free speech right. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to protect publicity by copyright and it is needed to find new ways to protect publicity in the Internet.
Abstract
One who appropriates to his own use or benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability for invasion of his privacy. “Privacy” right is defined as personal and non-assignable right to be free of embarrassment and humiliation. However, in order to protect the pecuniary value of name or likeness, the right of publicity arose from the right of privacy. It serves two primary purposes: (1) to protect all persons from the anguish that may accompany the unwanted use of their identity; and (2) to protect the property interest that persons, especially celebrities, have in their identities. There is no right of publicity statute in Korea and torts include appropriation of individual's identity such as name and likeness for advantage. Recently, the Congress made two bills of amendment copyright law. One defines the right of publicity as copyright. The other suggests new remedy for infringement of copyright on the Internet. It includes the order of the Minister of Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism to (1) shut down the individual user's internet cafe or blog, (2) suspend or cancel the individual user's account, and (3) suspend or cancel the information and communication service. However, there is criticism that whether publicity is copyrightable and the Minister's order may invade free speech right. Nevertheless, it is appropriate to protect publicity by copyright and it is needed to find new ways to protect publicity in the Internet.
참고문헌 (46)
- 곽윤직, "민법주해(ⅩⅧ)", 채권, (11) (2005), 박영사
- 박경신, "사진으로 보는 저작권,초상권,상표권 기타 등등" (2008), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2007), 박영사
- 이영록, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구(I)" (2003), 저작권심의조정위원회
- 이영록, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구(II)" (2004), 저작권심의조정위원회
- 이인호, "모델영화와 인격권" (2007), 중앙대학교출판부
- 이해완, "저작권법" (2007), 박영사
- 강남진, "인격권에 관한 연구" (1994), 민사법연구
- 김재형, "언론에 의한 인격권 침해에 대한 구제수단", 인권과 정의, 339 (2004)
- 김재형, "모델소설과 인격권", 인권과 정의, 255 (1997)
- 나윤수, "퍼블리시티권의 개념과 대상에 관한 고찰", 법학연구, 24 (2006), 제24권
- 남형두, "세계시장 관점에서 본 퍼블리시티권" (2005), 저스티스
- 남형두, "퍼블리시티권의 철학적 기반(상)" (2007), 저스티스
- 남형두, "퍼블리시티권의 철학적 기반(하)" (2007), 저스티스
- 노기호, "언론의 인격권침해에 대한 금지청구권" (1995), 한양법학
- 박경신, "순수한 인격권으로서의 초상권은 가치인가, 규범인가", 창작과 권리, (51) (2008), 제51호
- 박도희, "인격권의 보호 법리와 그 적용의 한계", 박사, pp.2005
- 박성호, "실연자의 ‘예명’에 대한 법적 보호(상)", 법조, 613 (2007)
- 박성호, "실연자의 ‘예명’에 대한 법적 보호(하)", 법조, 614 (2007)
- 박인수, "퍼블리시티권의 법리와 판례에 관한 연구", 헌법학연구, 7(3) (2001)
- 박종원, "퍼블리시권에 관한 연구", 법학연구, 25 (2007)
- 박준우, "퍼블리시티권의 침해요건 중 ‘상업적 이용’의 판단기준", 비교사법, 13(2) (2006)
- 박훤일, "실존 인물의 모델화와 인격권 보호", 영산법률논총, 3(2) (2006)
- 배병일, "초상권에 관한 연구", 재산법연구, 9(1) (1992)
- 손동권, "시사보도와 사자의 명예훼손", 언론중재 (1992)
- 이재경, "퍼블리시티권의 법제화 가", 법학논총, 15 (2006)
- 이호열, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 법적인 문제", 지적재산권법연구, 3 (1999)
- 임건면, "초상권침해에 대한 민사법적 책임에 관한 소고" (2001), 재산법연구
- 정희섭, "재산권으로서의 퍼블리시티권리", 재산법연구, 20(1) (2003), 제1호
- 한위수, "퍼블리시티권의 침해와 민사책임(상)", 인권과 정의, (242) (1996)
- 한위수, "퍼블리시티권의 침해와 민사책임(하)", 인권과 정의, (243) (1996)
- 한위수, "명예의 훼손과 민사상의 제문제", 사법논집, 24 (1993)
- 홍춘의, "인격권의 보호에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1989
- Melville B. Nimmer, "CASES AND MATERIALS ON COPYRIGHT" (2006), LexisNexis
- Donald E. Biederman, "LAW AND BUSINESS OF THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRIES" (2007), Praeger Publishers
- Alicia M. Hunt, "Everyone wants to be a star: extensive publicity rights for noncelebrities unduly restrict commercial speech", Northwestern University Law Review, 95 (2001)
- Bruce P. Keller, "The right of publicity: past, present, future" (2000)
- Dana Howells, "Log me in to the old ballgame: C.B.C. Distribution & Marketing", Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 22 (2007)
- David M. Schlachter, "Adjudicating the Right of Puplicity in Three Easy Steps", Journal of Law and Policy, 14 (2006)
- Lee Goldman, "Elvis is alive, but he shouldn't be: the right of publicity revised" (1992), Brigham Young University Law Review
- Matthew Savare, "The Price of Celebrity: valuing the right of publicity in calculating compensatory damages", UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 11 (2004)
- J. Tomas Mccarthy, "The Spring 1995 Horace S. Manges lecture - The Human Persona as Commercial Property : the Right of Publicity", Journal of Law and the Arts (1995)
- Samuel D. Warren, "The Right of Privacy", Harvard Law Review, 4 (1890)
- 박찬숙의원, "저작권법 일부개정법률안(박찬숙의원 대표발의), 2005. 11. 9", ~ (2005)
- 박찬숙의, "저작권법 일부개정법률안(박찬숙의원 대표발의) 검토보고서, 2005. 11", ~ (2005)
- 진성호의원, "학술지 학술대회 논문 단행본 보고서 학위논문 인터넷자원 기타 저작권법 일부개정법률안(진성호의원 대표발의), 2008. 7. 24", ~ (2008)