본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

법률서비스시장의 진입장벽 - 「법의 지배에 기반한 사회발전」을 위한 비판적 고찰-

Lawyers and Social Development: For Competetive Legal Services Market in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Can the lawyers in a society make any contribution to the development of their society? This essay starts with this question to be answered by referring to several social indicators of relevant international institutions. The finding is that the number of lawyers are saliently correlated with the World Bank's rule of law indicators and the CIRI's human rights indicators, which means that the more lawyers practice, the more rule of law and human rights. The economic development has, however, no significant correlationship with the lawyers contrary to the conclusions of S. P. Magee. It can be said that the free and democratic society is indispensible with the considerable size of lawyers, which can exercise salient influences on the execution of law and protection of human rights. The economic market can, as well, be sustained with aid of the lawyers who can clearly set out rights and duties and reduce lots of transaction costs, but the portion that the lawyers can contribute to the economic development seems so marginal that any significant correlationship can be found. From these findings, the solid barrier to entry to the legal services market in Korea can be classified as a kind of barrier to the development of Korean society. Market failures against which state can intervene to private market can be grouped into three categories: asymmetric information, externalities, and undersupply of public goods. The first failures, however, are almost overcome with the development of in-house lawyer system and knowledge-information society. The second one can be cured only by increasing the competetion between the lawyers, while the last one by creating and increasing various kinds of legal services. All are contrary to the Korean situation, where strict regulation of the number of new entry to the legal services market. The highest barrier in the world that the Korean legal system has created has no valid ground for its survival any more.

Abstract

Can the lawyers in a society make any contribution to the development of their society? This essay starts with this question to be answered by referring to several social indicators of relevant international institutions. The finding is that the number of lawyers are saliently correlated with the World Bank's rule of law indicators and the CIRI's human rights indicators, which means that the more lawyers practice, the more rule of law and human rights. The economic development has, however, no significant correlationship with the lawyers contrary to the conclusions of S. P. Magee. It can be said that the free and democratic society is indispensible with the considerable size of lawyers, which can exercise salient influences on the execution of law and protection of human rights. The economic market can, as well, be sustained with aid of the lawyers who can clearly set out rights and duties and reduce lots of transaction costs, but the portion that the lawyers can contribute to the economic development seems so marginal that any significant correlationship can be found. From these findings, the solid barrier to entry to the legal services market in Korea can be classified as a kind of barrier to the development of Korean society. Market failures against which state can intervene to private market can be grouped into three categories: asymmetric information, externalities, and undersupply of public goods. The first failures, however, are almost overcome with the development of in-house lawyer system and knowledge-information society. The second one can be cured only by increasing the competetion between the lawyers, while the last one by creating and increasing various kinds of legal services. All are contrary to the Korean situation, where strict regulation of the number of new entry to the legal services market. The highest barrier in the world that the Korean legal system has created has no valid ground for its survival any more.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 신도철, "변호사 인력 수급 전망", 2006 경제학 공동학술대회 (2006)
  2. 신우철, "감시하는 자를 누가 감시할 것인가?”-변호사징계에 관한 비교사법 제도론적 일 고찰", 영남법학, 8(1) (2002)
  3. 이제민, "한국의 산업화와 선업화정책. in: 한국경제성장사: 예비적 고찰" (2001), 서울대학교출판부
  4. 참여연대 사법감시센터, "늘어나고 있는 판·검사의 기업진출, ‘법경(法經)유착’우려돼", ~ (2005)
  5. 한상희, "법률가의 개념 - 우리 법률서비스체계의 분석을 위한 서론", 법학연구, 51(2), pp.157~193 (2010), 법학연구소
  6. 한상희, "우리 변호사체계의 문제점 — 법치와 경쟁력 확보를 위한 실태분석 —", 민주법학, (43), pp.271~315 (2010), 민주주의법학연구회
  7. 한상희, "미국통상정책과정에서의 변호사의 역할", 서울대 미국학, 17 (1994)
  8. 황승흠, "변호사 직무의 성격과 법률서비스 전달체계의 개선방향", 법과사회, (27), pp.55~76 (2004), 법과사회이론학회
  9. Baarsma, B., "Regulation of the legal profession and access to law: An economic perspective, Commissioned by the International Association of Legal Expenses Insurance" (2008), RIAD
  10. Chan-Fa Lo, "The Legal Culture and System of Taiwan" (2006), Klumer Law International
  11. Clark, R. C., "Why So Many Lawyers? Are They Good or Bad?", Fordham Law Review, 61 (1993)
  12. Clarke, D. C., "What kind of legal system is necessary ofr economic development? The China puzzle. in: Law Reform 516 in Developing and Transitional States" (2007), Routledge
  13. Competition Authority, "Competitions in Proffesional Services" (2006), Barristers & Solicitors
  14. Cross, F. B., "Law versus Economics?", Law and Social Inquiry, 17 (1992)
  15. Cross, F. B., "The First Thing We Do, Let's Kill All the Economists: An Empirical Evaluation of the Effect of Lawyers on the United States Economy and Political System", Texas Law Review, 70 (1992)
  16. Cross, F. B., "Lawyers, The Economy, and Society", Amrerican Business Law Journal, 35 (1998)
  17. Cross, F. B., "Law and Economic Growth", Texas Law Review,, 80 (2001)
  18. Davis, R., "Exploring the Litigation Expolsion Myth" (2002), APLA
  19. Epp, C. R., "Do Lawyers Impair Economic Growth?", Law and Social Inquiry, 17 (1992)
  20. Galanter, M., "Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) about our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society", UCLA Law Review, 31 (1984)
  21. Galanter, M., "The Day after the Litigation Explosion", Maryland Law Review, 46, pp.3~39 (1986)
  22. Galanter, M., "News From Nowhere: The Debased Debate On Civil Justice", Denver University Las Review, 71, pp.77~ (1993)
  23. Galanter, M., "Predators And Parasites: Lawyer-Bashing And Civil Justice", Georgia Law Review, 28, pp.633~ (1994)
  24. Galanter, M., "Tournament of Lawyers: the Transformation of the Big Law Firm" (1991), Chicago University Press
  25. Gindsburg, T., "Law and the Liberal Transformation of the Northeast Asian Legal Complex in Korea and Taiwan. in: Fight for Political Freedom:Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism" (2007), Hart Publishing
  26. Ginsburg, T., "Rule by law: the politics of courts in authoritarian regimes" (2008), Unversity Press
  27. Halliday, T. C., "The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism. in: Fight for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism" (2007), Hart Publishing
  28. Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators 1996–2008, "Kaufmann, D.", The World Bank Development Research Group Macroeconomics and Growth Team, ~ (2009)
  29. Keefer, P., "Lawyers and Economic Growth-A Red Herring?", Law and Social Inquiry, 17 (1992)
  30. Magee, S. P., "The Optimum Number of Lawyers: A Reply to Epp", Law & Social Inquiry, 17 (1992)
  31. Miller, R. E., "Grievances, Claims, and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture", Law & Society Review, 15 (1981)
  32. Nelson, R. L., "Ideology, Scholarship, and Sociolegal Change: Lessons from Galanter and the "Litigation Crisis", Law & Society Review, 678 (1987)
  33. Product market regulation in non- manufacturing sectors of OECD countries: measurement and highlights, "OECD Economics Department", ~ (2009)
  34. Pérez-Perdomo, R., "Latin American Lawyers: Historical Instruction, Stanford" (2006), Stanford University Press
  35. Powell, M. J., "Professional Innovation: Corporate Lawyers and Private Lawmaking", Law and Social Inquiry, 18, pp.518~ (1993)
  36. Priest, G. L., "Lawyers, Liability, and Law Reform: Effects on American Economic Growth and Trade Competitiveness", Denver University Law Review, 71 (1993)
  37. Rogowski, R., "German corporate lawyers: Social closure in autopoietic prespective. in: Professional Competition and Professional Power" (1995), Routledge
  38. Sander, R. H., "Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspective on a Turbulent Market", Law and Social Inquiry, 14 (1989)
  39. Sen, A., "Development as Freedom" (1999), Oxford University Press
  40. Shinnick, E., "Aspects of regulatory reform in the legal profession: Austalia, Ireland and the Netherlands", International Journal of the Legal Profession, 10 (2003)
  41. Stephen, F. H., "Liberalization of Legal Services, Institute for Law, Economy and Global Governance" (2007), University of Manchester
  42. Suchman, M. C., "The Hired Gun as Facilitator: Lawyers and the Suppression of Business Disputes in Silicon Valley", Law and Social Inquiry, 21 (1996)
  43. Tamanaha, B. Z., "Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  44. "Human Rights Dataset 2009"[URL]
  45. The OECD Competition Committee, "Competitive Restrictions in Legal Professions" (2007)
  46. Trubek, D. M., "The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal" (2006), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)