상해 임시정부의 국제법적 지위
International Legal Status of the 'Korean Provisional Government' of Shanghai
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The legal status of the 'Korean Provisional Government' of Shanghai(KPG) is a very interesting topic in terms not only of theoretical aspects but also of practical ones under international law. In short, the KPG is only a provisional government voluntarily constituted by political refugees fleeing abroad. It is problematic in that the KPG had no legal connection with the former 'Great Korean Empire'(GKE) and was a voluntary political organization in spite of its external proclamations. In consequence, it could not be regarded as a government in exile. Right after its foundation, the KPG tried to get formal or de jure recognition from foreign governments in China, Europe and the United States. Notwithstanding its strenuous efforts, the KPG was not recognized as a de jure government in international society as a whole except a small number of countries. Generally speaking, it was treated in reality as a 'de facto government.' Some people contend that a new nation building was made through the establishment of the KPG. But a political entity KPG was trying to represent had not fully satisfied the constituent elements of a state, namely, a permanent population, a defined territory, an effective government, capacity to enter into relations with the other states. In this viewpoint, the so-called theory of 1919 Nation Building of Republic of Korea(ROK) cannot be duly supported under international law.
Abstract
The legal status of the 'Korean Provisional Government' of Shanghai(KPG) is a very interesting topic in terms not only of theoretical aspects but also of practical ones under international law. In short, the KPG is only a provisional government voluntarily constituted by political refugees fleeing abroad. It is problematic in that the KPG had no legal connection with the former 'Great Korean Empire'(GKE) and was a voluntary political organization in spite of its external proclamations. In consequence, it could not be regarded as a government in exile. Right after its foundation, the KPG tried to get formal or de jure recognition from foreign governments in China, Europe and the United States. Notwithstanding its strenuous efforts, the KPG was not recognized as a de jure government in international society as a whole except a small number of countries. Generally speaking, it was treated in reality as a 'de facto government.' Some people contend that a new nation building was made through the establishment of the KPG. But a political entity KPG was trying to represent had not fully satisfied the constituent elements of a state, namely, a permanent population, a defined territory, an effective government, capacity to enter into relations with the other states. In this viewpoint, the so-called theory of 1919 Nation Building of Republic of Korea(ROK) cannot be duly supported under international law.
참고문헌 (15)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론, 개정판" (2005), 법문사
- 김영수, "대한민국임시정부헌법론" (1980), 삼영사
- 김희곤, "대한민국임시정부 연구" (2004), 지식산업사
- 閔錫麟, "中國護法政府承認韓國臨時政府始末實記" (1954), 國民黨黨史會
- 김명기, "대한민국임시정부의 정통성에 관한 연구", 국제법학회논총, 38(1) (1993)
- 김찬규, "PLO의 법적 지위", 고시연구 (1984)
- 나인균, "대한민국임시정부의 국제법적 성격, In 현대공법의 제문제" (1993), 삼영사
- 박배근, "大韓民國臨時政府의 國際法的 地位와 大韓民國의 國家的 同一性 (下)", 법학연구, 14(1), pp.40~72 (2004), 법학연구원
- 신기석, "대한민국 임시정부의 국제적 지위, In 3․1운동 50주년기념논집" (1969), 동아일보사
- 이용중, "대한민국임시정부의 지위와 대일항전에 대한 국제법적 고찰", 국제법학회논총, 54(1), pp.105~127 (2009), 대한국제법학회
- H. Lauterpacht, "Recognition in International Law" (1947), Cambridge University Press
- Hans Kelsen, "Principles of International Law, 2nd ed" (1967), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- M. Rotter, "Government-in-Exile, In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 10" (1987), North-Holland Publishers
- Malcolm D. Evans, "International Law, 3rd ed" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Marjorie M. Whiteman, "Digest of International Law, Vol. 2" (1963), U. S. Department of State
