본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

온라인 웹보드게임 규제정책과 형사처벌의 한계

The Regulation on Web Board Game from the viewpoint of Criminal Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

The nature of speculative or gamble of Web board game is a controversial issue in online game industry. Web board game is chance game or gambling style game such as Gostop or Poker game operated in online. But this game is criticized because it encourages a spirit of gambling and speculation. Therefore there are some policies of regulation on this game that are administrative guideline of government and game industry promotion act and game rating system. Although this policies have an intention of preventing speculative games, web board game is not regarded as gamble or speculative game. Because web board game providers never change game money into real money, exchange exists outside of game system. The key point of speculation is prize(output) from the game. Recently government expressed pre-announcement of legislation that aims to prevent encouraging a spirit of speculation in web board game industries. This regulation asks for web board providers to follow the provisions of enforcement ordinance of game industry promotion act. But it is very difficult for them to obey the provisions, because economical impact is too strong and they could not accept the perception that web board game is regarded as game. I think, it would be reasonable to resolve the problem of web board game in game rating system and government must endeavor to provide self-regulation guidelines in cooperation with web board game industry.

Abstract

The nature of speculative or gamble of Web board game is a controversial issue in online game industry. Web board game is chance game or gambling style game such as Gostop or Poker game operated in online. But this game is criticized because it encourages a spirit of gambling and speculation. Therefore there are some policies of regulation on this game that are administrative guideline of government and game industry promotion act and game rating system. Although this policies have an intention of preventing speculative games, web board game is not regarded as gamble or speculative game. Because web board game providers never change game money into real money, exchange exists outside of game system. The key point of speculation is prize(output) from the game. Recently government expressed pre-announcement of legislation that aims to prevent encouraging a spirit of speculation in web board game industries. This regulation asks for web board providers to follow the provisions of enforcement ordinance of game industry promotion act. But it is very difficult for them to obey the provisions, because economical impact is too strong and they could not accept the perception that web board game is regarded as game. I think, it would be reasonable to resolve the problem of web board game in game rating system and government must endeavor to provide self-regulation guidelines in cooperation with web board game industry.

참고문헌 (15)

  1. 김용찬, "도박⋅도박개장죄, 사행행위 등 규제 및 처벌특례법위반죄 및 게임산업진흥에 관한 법률위반죄의 관계에 대한 고찰", 저스티스, (113), pp.133~177 (2009), 한국법학원
  2. 박태순, "온라인게임 등급분류의 추세 및 현안, In 게임법제도의 현황과 과제" (2009), 박영사
  3. 이정훈, "게임산업진흥법상 환전업금지조항의 의미", 法學論文集, 31(1), pp.625~646 (2007), 법학연구원
  4. 이정훈, "온라인 賭博의 刑事責任- 온라인 보드게임을 중심으로 -*", 중앙법학, 6(3), pp.157~187 (2004), 중앙법학회
  5. 정호경, "온라인 게임 규제의 문제점과 개선방안 - 소위 고포류 게임의 사행성 논란을 중심으로 -", 경제규제와 법, 4(2), pp.7~40 (2011), 법학연구소
  6. 최성락, "사행성 게임 베팅 상한선 규제의 적정성에 관한 연구", 한국행정논집, 24(1), pp.261~278 (2012), 한국정부학회
  7. 황성기, "게임산업진흥법 제정 및 개정인으로 인한 게임물내용심의 및 등급분류제도의 변화, In Entertainment Law" (2007), 박영사
  8. 황성기, "온라인 웹보드게임의 사행성 규제의 헌법적 한계 - 도박과 게임의 개념본질적 구분을 중심으로 -", 경제규제와 법, 4(2), pp.41~59 (2011), 법학연구소
  9. 황승흠, "게임물 규제체제의 변천과정에 관한 연구―한국게임법제의 역사(Ⅱ)―", 중앙법학, 11(1), pp.421~456 (2009), 중앙법학회
  10. 황승흠, "2007년 개정 게임산업진흥법상 사행성게임물제도의 의의와 법적 성격", 공법학연구, 8(4), pp.305~328 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  11. 황승흠, "게임물 등급분류 개념의 문제점 : 게임물의 운영방식․이용방식과 등급분류의 대상으로서의 내용과의 법적 관계를 중심으로", 공법학연구, 13(1), pp.401~430 (2012), 한국비교공법학회
  12. 황승흠, "인터넷 콘텐츠 규제에 있어서 법제도와 사업자 자율규제의 결합에 관한 연구", 공법학연구, 9(4), pp.261~288 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
  13. 황승흠, "게임산업법 제28조 제2호의 온라인게임 적용 문제에 관한 검토", 법학논총, 24(1), pp.375~411 (2011), 법학연구소
  14. 한국게임산업협회, "웹보드게임의 사행성 이슈 해결방안", ~ (2012)
  15. Amy Tracy, "The Effect and Enforcement of Click Fraud and Online Advertising", U. Ark. Little Rock l. Rev, 32 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)